New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

oops

Upgrading the nation’s Medicare program and expanding it to cover people of all ages would yield more than a half-trillion dollars in efficiency savings in its first year of operation, enough to pay for high-quality, comprehensive health benefits for all residents of the United States at a lower cost to most individuals, families and businesses.

That’s the chief finding of a new fiscal study by Gerald Friedman, a professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. There would even be money left over to help pay down the national debt, he said.Friedman says his analysis shows that a nonprofit single-payer system based on the principles of the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act, H.R. 676, introduced by Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., and co-sponsored by 45 other lawmakers, would save an estimated $592 billion in 2014. That would be more than enough to cover all 44 million people the government estimates will be uninsured in that year and to upgrade benefits for everyone else.

“No other plan can achieve this magnitude of savings on health care,” Friedman said.

His findings were released Wednesday at a congressional briefing in the Cannon House Office Building hosted by Public Citizen and Physicians for a National Health Program, followed by a news conference with Rep. Conyers and others in observance of Medicare’s 48th anniversary. A copy of Friedman’s full report, with tables and charts, is availablehere.

Friedman said the savings would come from slashing the administrative waste associated with today’s private health insurance industry ($476 billion) and using the new, public system’s bargaining muscle to negotiate pharmaceutical drug prices down to European levels ($116 billion).

“These savings would be more than enough to fund $343 billion in improvements to our health system, including the achievement of truly universal coverage, improved benefits, and the elimination of premiums, co-payments and deductibles, which are major barriers to people seeking care,” he said.


http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/july/‘...year-new-study

what mr. Friedman does not realize that we should not to cover everyone but to make sure that the uber-wealthy can suck as much money out of the middle class, the working class and poor as possible.
Anything is else is evil, ungodly, un-American and probably satanic.
Lets not allow the evils of Marxism, socialism, communism make life easier for the non-rich.
Liberty to litter streets with corpses and go bankrupt over simple procudures which in US cost tens of thousands of dollars should not be infringed upon
 
this might actually work, yuri . . . if it weren't for the inconvenient fact that more than 30% of all doctors and hospitals have stopped accepting medicare in the past 5 years, and many more expected to do so.

this just - university professor has calculated that sending people to veterinarians could save "gazillions" . . . and result in better care.
 
We'll eventually get around to implementing the obvious solution to our health-care insurance problem, but it will take a while. Too many Americans have been successfully trained to fear their own government.
 
this might actually work, yuri . . . if it weren't for the inconvenient fact that more than 30% of all doctors and hospitals have stopped accepting medicare in the past 5 years, and many more expected to do so.

this just - university professor has calculated that sending people to veterinarians could save "gazillions" . . . and result in better care.
when everybody will be on medicare, i would not advice them to continue that practice. WHO ARE THEY GOING TO GET TREATED ?
 
We'll eventually get around to implementing the obvious solution to our health-care insurance problem, but it will take a while. Too many Americans have been successfully trained to fear their own government.

given the recent revelations at the NSA, IRS, and DOJ, fears are justified but not nearly widely enough socialized.

what do you expect from a voting public which (on average) can name only 1 of its 2 senators, and cannot name its house member?
 
The cost savings in preventative medicine alone may well be the icing on the cake that is not even fully factored in at this point. Imagine the treatment savings from early detection of cancer and heart disease alone.
 
The cost savings in preventative medicine alone may well be the icing on the cake that is not even fully factored in at this point. Imagine the treatment savings from early detection of cancer and heart disease alone.
cons claim to be deficit hawks and always come for whinig about the debt , but all of a sudden when the actual measures are taken to reduce that , like in Health care they forget about the debt right away, because -"freedom' , that's why
 
Back
Top