New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Project Veritas

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you show any federal funds were used for abortions? If you cannot then there is no illegal activity. It is my understanding that PP is audited on a regular basis to ascertain the source of money used to fund the abortion side of the organization.
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsall...lanned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money

Title X does not allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Medicaid, however, does allow government money to be spent on them — in very restricted cases.

The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for "medically necessary" abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.
 
James O'Keefe's Project Veritas is a right-wing operation that tries to carry out stings to embarrass liberal and mainstream politicians, charities, and press outlets. O'Keefe is most famous for the hoax Acorn sting. Basically, he made up a story about how he'd gone into an Acorn office dressed like a blaxploitation pimp, asking for and receiving advice on how to break the law. It was all a pack of lies, shakily supported by some heavily edited video, but it did the trick: skittish Congress members defunded Acorn, which was the goal of the hoax:

http://fair.org/extra/falling-for-the-acorn-hoax/

His lies were so effective that time that you'd almost be mistaken for thinking him an evil genius. But after watching one after another of his schemes blow up in his face by way of incredible stupidity on the part of his conspirators, I'm thinking he just got lucky -- his first big hoax lined up well with some knee-jerk racism among Congress members and he got an unearned win in the process.

You've probably heard about his latest attempt to trick the Washington Post into publishing a phony Roy Moore story. If not, the upshot is he recruited a right-wing woman to pose as a victim of Moore, with the hope that the Post would run with it, and then when the hoax was revealed it would discredit all the other women who'd accused Moore. The scheme fell apart because of hilarious carelessness on the part of the O'Keefe team: basically, the woman had a social media trail, including a GoFundMe site, that made it clear she was working for the right-wing press.

That wasn't the only example of O'Keefe being inept, though. There's a great article laying out how badly Project Veritas's efforts tend to go:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...ls-to-prove-washington-post-is-fake-news.html

… the people who are dumb enough to believe these conspiracy theories are not generally smart enough to carry out a competent entrapment scheme. O’Keefe attempted to impersonate a Detroit Free Press columnist at the polls, and failed, in part because the poll worker knew the Free Press writer personally. An elaborate effort to sting the League of Conservation Voters failed clumsily because the operatives left their recording devices sitting around. The “Canadians” who tried to entrap Hillary Clinton staffers into accepting “foreign” donations all gave the same phone number, which turned out to be from “Students for a Conservative Voice.” O’Keefe’s attempt to register the vote of a dead person accidentally used the identity of a voter who is completely alive. His attempt to impersonate a Hungarian donor to the Clinton campaign floundered when its catfisher forgot to hang up the phone and accidentally recorded a long message explaining the details of the operation.
​
Still, as dumb as he is, he doesn't really have to be smart. If he takes a thousand shots and only makes one, he can count on the right-wing press trumpeting that one bit of dumb luck while ignoring the rest. And if the mainstream press is "only" spotting the hoax 99 times out of 100, the dummies on the right will still fixate on that last time as evidence of partisan bias. O'Keefe may be accidentally disproving the conspiracy theories he's attempting to prove, in the eyes of anyone whose news is relatively unfiltered, but through the micron-fine filter of the right-wing press, only the stories that resonate with confirmation bias will get through.


O'Keefe is most famous for the hoax Acorn sting.

Where is ACORN now?
Long before the activist videos delivered what may become the final blow, the organization was dogged for years by financial problems and accusations of fraud
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Community_Organizations_for_Reform_Now

You've probably heard about his latest attempt to trick the Washington Post into publishing a phony Roy Moore story

Now we know what this is about? Why don't you tell us how the WAPO found the Roy Moore Victims?
biden-640x480.png


BIRMINGHAM, Alabama — Deborah Wesson Gibson, the woman who alleges that she engaged in a legal and consensual but inappropriate relationship with Republican senatorial candidate Roy Moore, has boasted about doing work for Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats.

Still, as dumb as he is, he doesn't really have to be smart

This would explain you ranting on...It's so easy to debunk you, yet you still press on.

Get back to me when you are ready to talk about the rapes Bill Clinton did.
 
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsall...lanned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money

Title X does not allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Medicaid, however, does allow government money to be spent on them — in very restricted cases.

The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for "medically necessary" abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.

So in case one of Bill Clinton's victim's was pregnant.
 
With any large organization, if you look hard enough, you'll find someone, somewhere, doing something illegal. But, with Acorn, despite intensive review, there was never any criminality found that was remotely sufficient to justify defunding them. That's why O'Keefe found it necessary to lie to get the job done. The truth wasn't cutting it, so he invented a story and doctored some video to try to support it, and the Congress fell for it hook, line, and sinker. But the good news is that O'Keefe's scams don't work like they used to. His kind of naked dishonesty was something people weren't really prepared for. Now that it's understood that he simply lies through his teeth whenever it's politically convenient, people demand stronger evidence, and that has really hurt his effectiveness.

The New York Times reported on July 9, 2008, that Dale Rathke, the brother of ACORN's founder Wade Rathke, was found to have embezzled $948,607.50 from the group and affililiated charitalbe organizations in 1999 and 2000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Community_Organizations_for_Reform_Now

ACORN had a long history of misdeed s...You just cover up for them like you do for Bill Clinton's rapes. You are nothing more than a white supremacist liar.
 
Can you refute this:

https://www.snopes.com/2016/10/18/project-veritas-election-videos/

"The framing and style of videos created by James O’Keefe is well known due to his 2009 'sting' in which he and accomplice Hannah Giles visited ACORN offices and pretended to be seeking advice on how to run an illegal business that included the use of underage girls in the sex trade.

"The resulting videos — which were edited to create the impression that O’Keefe and Giles had spoken to ACORN representatives while dressed as a pimp and prostitute — dealt that organization a mortal blow before reports publicizing the deception in O’Keefe’s videos came to light..."

ACORN Admits to Embezzlement Scandal; Founder Steps Down ...
nlpc.org/.../28/acorn-admits-embezzlement-scandal-founder-steps-down
For several weeks ACORN has been reeling over revelations that Rathke’s brother, Dale, had embezzled nearly $1 million back during the turn of the decade – and that both had conspired to cover up the offense.
 
Another great example of a hoax right wing sting blowing up in the face of the hoaxsters. But that’s the benefit of the right wing media filter: the dummies heard about the supposed sale of baby parts, but then were meticulously sheltered from the truth when that came out. So, to this day, the dumbest of the dumb still don’t realize that was fake news.

I suppose you have the truth?
 
this completely explains why California went heavily for Hillary in 2016.
Actually, if you look at state-by-state data, you'll see a pretty strong correlation between how well-educated a state is and how liberal it tends to vote.

For example, the top five states by percent of people with college degrees are MA, CO, MD, CT, and NJ, all of which went for Clinton. The bottom five are WV, MS, AR, KY, and LA, all of which went for Trump.

You can do similar comparisons in terms of NAEP scores, or percent of people with postgrad degrees. Ignorance is the friend of the GOP. That's part of why they're eager to siphon off money from public education into the paychecks of big for-profit education companies. An educated electorate is a Democrat-leaning electorate.
 
Your link:

"Federal prosecutors targeting anti-Trump protesters are relying on video evidence from Project Veritas, a far-right group under fire this week for allegedly trying to dupe the Washington Post with a false story of sexual misconduct.

The US attorney’s office submitted the footage in court on Tuesday as part of an ongoing trial against activists who protested Donald Trump’s inauguration and now face conspiracy and rioting charges that could lead to decades in prison.

"Prosecutors played the video – which reportedly showed undercover footage from a meeting of activists – one day after the Washington Post reported that Project Veritas had sent a woman undercover pretending to be a victim of Roy Moore, the US Senate candidate accused of sexual misconduct."

Why would federal prosecutors rely on Fake News to garner convictions?:confused:

"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past."
 
Doesn’t truly matter unless you care to intend acorn members were convicted due to an edited video? Of course they weren’t, it was because they were crooked.

Actually, no one from ACORN was convicted of anything in the wake of the videos ... they were cleared of all charges of wrongdoing by several investigations.
 
ACORN Admits to Embezzlement Scandal; Founder Steps Down ...
nlpc.org/.../28/acorn-admits-embezzlement-scandal-founder-steps-down
For several weeks ACORN has been reeling over revelations that Rathke’s brother, Dale, had embezzled nearly $1 million back during the turn of the decade – and that both had conspired to cover up the offense.

ACORN was, of course, the victim of this crime, just as it was the victim of O'Keefe's fraud.
 
Doesn’t truly matter unless you care to intend acorn members were convicted due to an edited video? Of course they weren’t, it was because they were crooked.

They were convicted in Nevada of paying bonuses...that is against Nevada law.

A guy in Seattle was convicted of inventing names to put on registration cards. That was because Acorn was going to close the office he worked in unless he got 20 per day...rather than do the work, he lied and made up the names.

No illegal votes.
 
They were convicted in Nevada of paying bonuses...that is against Nevada law.

A guy in Seattle was convicted of inventing names to put on registration cards. That was because Acorn was going to close the office he worked in unless he got 20 per day...rather than do the work, he lied and made up the names.

No illegal votes.
Oh you’ve begun research?
Let me know when you catch up to the ones convicted of voter fraud, the ones conspiring to add bogus names to the voting rolls by using old lists and such. States purged thousands of names they added by falsifying data.
“Illegal votes” is a misnomer when you’ve falsified the voter rolls creating thousands of unregistered “legal” voters. That’s why ACORN people were found guilty. They’re not victims, they were acting far more crooked than O’Keefe.
 
we find common ground on voting ID.

the concept that it should be an order of magnitude more difficult to open a checking account or renew a drivers license than to vote is ridiculous.

I'm okay with fingerprint ID, but to be honest, is any polling place going to have the experts or technology for instant fingerprint verification?

most other civilized nations have "citizens id cards". this is a single, (mostly) secure method to vet everything from taxes, voting, driving privileges, car rental, welfare eligibility, and government health care access.

has anyone tried calling in to their health insurer recently? in order to even SEE my online file, I have to know a login, password, answer a secret question, then key in a one time "access code" which is texted to my cell phone within 5 minutes. Simply to determine if my health claim is accepted or not.

The idea related to fingerprints was that if you have no picture ID and show up to vote you can have your picture taken and a fingerprint to record at a central system. If you then attempt to do the same thing elsewhere you'd be caught by the fingerprint and facial recognition software at the central site. If you already have photo ID the fingerprint and photo at the polling place wouldn't be needed.
 
Oh you’ve begun research?
Let me know when you catch up to the ones convicted of voter fraud, the ones conspiring to add bogus names to the voting rolls by using old lists and such. States purged thousands of names they added by falsifying data.
“Illegal votes” is a misnomer when you’ve falsified the voter rolls creating thousands of unregistered “legal” voters. That’s why ACORN people were found guilty. They’re not victims, they were acting far more crooked than O’Keefe.

Let me know when you find someone convicted of actually casting a vote using a bogus registration from Acorn. I won't hold my breath.

PS. Acorn was the victim. They were being defrauded by the people who collected money for registrations when the registration cards themselves were illegal. Acorn turned those people in.
 
ACORN Admits to Embezzlement Scandal; Founder Steps Down ...
nlpc.org/.../28/acorn-admits-embezzlement-scandal-founder-steps-down
For several weeks ACORN has been reeling over revelations that Rathke’s brother, Dale, had embezzled nearly $1 million back during the turn of the decade – and that both had conspired to cover up the offense.
Your link doesn't mention O'Keefe and Gileso_O

https://www.snopes.com/2016/10/18/project-veritas-election-videos/

"The resulting videos — which were edited to create the impression that O’Keefe and Giles had spoken to ACORN representatives while dressed as a pimp and prostitute — dealt that organization a mortal blow before reports publicizing the deception in O’Keefe’s videos came to light..."

"O’Keefe’s incriminating ACORN video was shown to have been heavily edited — neither he nor Hannah Giles were actually in pimp and prostitute get-up when they spoke to ACORN employees, for example — and no criminal prosecutions of ACORN followed."

Can you refute the allegations Snopes makes against the "pimp" and his "whore", or not??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top