You can not "prove" an opinion.
So “identifying as” something is an opinion, and not a real thing?You can not "prove" an opinion.
First we have to know who the 'someone' is who allegedly said that. Then we'll ask that 'someone' if he did in fact say that. If 'someone' says he said that, then the guy is right: 'someone' said that. If 'someone' says he never said that, then the guy is wrong: 'someone' did not say that. But at the end of the day, who cares what 'someone' said?I predict none of the science deniers will be able to prove this guy wrong.
![]()
nope, you are taking things out of context.So “identifying as” something is an opinion, and not a real thing?
BINGO!So “identifying as” something is an opinion, and not a real thing?
So what gender do you identify as?BINGO!
So prove your context.nope, you are taking things out of context.
what gender do you identify as?So prove your context.
Prove identifying as something thus makes it so.
Are men who identify as women reasonably or biologically adapted to use the ladies room?
The one I was biologically born as, like all normal sane people.what gender do you identify as?
How is one "biologically adapted" to use the women's bathroom?So prove your context.
Prove identifying as something thus makes it so.
Are men who identify as women reasonably or biologically adapted to use the ladies room?
are you pretending?The one I was biologically born as, like all normal sane people.
Why?
So what gender do you identify as?
Ummm how old are you?How is one "biologically adapted" to use the women's bathroom?
are you pretending?The one I was born with as identified by science.
Why don’t you answer my question now instead of just being fatuous?are you pretending?
The other assumption of mine I need you to confirm is that you are in fact "someone" so my argument is logically sound.Why don’t you answer my question now instead of just being fatuous?
Not a bot here. Want me to tell you how many street signs or motorcycles are in the photo?The other assumption of mine I need you to confirm is that you are in fact "someone" so my argument is logically sound.