New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Question for cons

Judy1

Mayor
Do you think it will be a brokered convention?

If so, do you think some other candidate will come forward, and who do you think it might be?

Who would you want, and why?
 
Good questions Judy. Just to be sure that we are all on the same page I'm presenting some things garnered from Yahoo News on the subject: http://news.yahoo.com/brokered-convention-2012-almost-impossible-021300757.html

The GOP in 2012 has a total of 2,286 delegates in play. This means that a candidate who wins a majority of those delegates -- 1,144 -- will win the nomination . . . If no candidate receives a majority . . . the . . . for Republican Party leaders [would probably] . . . ask the superdelegates -- those at-large delegates who are typically not bound by their state to support any one candidate -- to throw their support behind the leading candidate giving that person a majority.

That's more or less what happened in the contest between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in 2008. The same thing would happen with the GOP in 2012 and in that case most of the super delegates would [some reluctantly some not] throw their vote to Mitt Romney. So it's highly unlikely that there will be a brokered convention -- which is a shame, because it would be a total hoot, wouldn't it?

I suspect that at that point Sarah Palin would throw her hat into the ring and that all hell would break out. It would be the most entertaining convention in the memory of most voters. Heck, she might even win in that case. Who knows? For myself I reluctantly want Mitt Romney under the theory that he's most likely to win over the independents, and those are the people that elect the president.
 
I think a brokered convention would be interesting, but it would also be counterproductive because it would be difficult for a candidate chosen as late as the convention to mount a strong campaign against Obama in such a short time.

Not sure if anyone new would enter the campaign. There are whispers that Palin would consider it, but that would be silly. She's a good spokesperson for the GOP as far as that goes, but I don't see her as President material........and I don't think many people see her as President.

I am still a supporter of Newt...........despite his many negatives. He would make a strong President and while he can claim to be Conservative, he's still pretty moderate. Santorum is a good man, but he is just too conservative to be able to "fix" anything. I think he would make everything worse. Romney will no doubt get the GOP nomination and he's fine. I'm not sure he has a plan that is as well thought-out as Newt's, and I'm not sure exactly how his "direction" differs from Obama's all that much.......... but I think the people that Romney would put into high official places (the Cabinet) in our government would be less Socialist/Marxist and more experienced and knowledgeable than those Obama has around him. So Romney would (of course) get my vote.
 
I'm beginning to doubt it Judy. It looks like Romney will probably get enough to be the nominee.
 
Does it really matter who is nominated by the conservative socialist party?

I'm hoping the progressive fascist wins re-election, because the next economic down turn is going to be MUCH GREATER than '08, and printed band-aids w/smiley faces are not going to help this time.
 
Does it really matter who is nominated by the conservative socialist party?

I'm hoping the progressive fascist wins re-election, because the next economic down turn is going to be MUCH GREATER than '08, and printed band-aids w/smiley faces are not going to help this time.

Very nice Dr. Gloomy A Doom. Problem is, he'll be coming for your guns and gold.. so prepare to surrender them.

Now where are those $12 ears of corn you promised us by now? :D
 
Back
Top