New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Question for Political Jack Liberals

JackDallas

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
Can you answer a simple question, honestly?
Would you prefer that The United States go to war against North Korea rather than a working peace treaty be achieved, that results in North Korea's de-nuclearization, during the term of Trump's presidency? Whether you believe it will happen or not is irrelevant. Would you prefer war over a Trump generated peace?
 
Emily said:
You know you're not going to get a straight answer, right?
Click to expand...
Well, I posted this to several liberals in the threads. Only one has answered so far (Eat The Rich) and he gave the right answer. I was surprised but pleased.
 
JackDallas said:
Can you answer a simple question, honestly?
Would you prefer that The United States go to war against North Korea rather than a working peace treaty be achieved, that results in North Korea's de-nuclearization, during the term of Trump's presidency? Whether you believe it will happen or not is irrelevant. Would you prefer war over a Trump generated peace?
Click to expand...

Most people don’t like “when did you stop beating your wife?” type rhetorical questions. They’re not to be taken seriously. Rewarding you with an answer would just encourage your juvenile behavior.

It must be discouraged.

;-)
 
Spamature said:
I did, in another thread. Now I know why he asked.

Also I think he's being a sucker if he thinks it going to end up that way.
Click to expand...
Here is your answer in the other thread:

SPAM: Those people live in horrible conditions under a dictator. Even so, I would not want to see the people of this country spill their blood to free them.

I would take Trump generated action that would lead to their peace and denuclearization in a heart beat.

That being said, I would also want to see the Kim family resign and go into hiding. Which is just about as likely as Trump getting them to denuclearize.

Why do you ask ?
JD: I ask because I wanted to see if Liberals would answer honestly. The Liberal Piss-Stream Media have made it clear that they are betting heavily on failure of this peace effort by President Trump. They have to know that North Korea is going to de-nuclearize, one way or the other. Trump has made that clear. We can no longer live under that threat. The Media must know that if the peace effort fails it will almost certainly lead to war or at least some sort of military action that will put Americans in harm's way.
Thanks for coming down on the right side of things. I will accept that you are being honest.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
Most people don’t like “when did you stop beating your wife?” type rhetorical questions. They’re not to be taken seriously. Rewarding you with an answer would just encourage your juvenile behavior.

It must be discouraged.

;-)
Click to expand...
I'll put you down for favoring war over Pax Trumpus.
 
JackDallas said:
Can you answer a simple question, honestly?
Would you prefer that The United States go to war against North Korea rather than a working peace treaty be achieved, that results in North Korea's de-nuclearization, during the term of Trump's presidency? Whether you believe it will happen or not is irrelevant. Would you prefer war over a Trump generated peace?
Click to expand...
Of course I would not prefer war over peace, what an incredibly stupid question. Why do you think we were concerned about Donald's bellicose rhetoric about "Rocket Man" and his other childish threats that resulted in a N Korean nuclear threat to Hawaii? Here's a return question: do you actually think this photo op that raised KJU's international profile and gave him endless propaganda to feed the people under his murderous totalitarian rule and a promise to end our military exercises in S Korea (which afforded significant intelligence collection opportunities for the US, particularly SIGINT), but provided exactly zero advantage for the US and zero means of expecting or enforcing any nuclear drawdown by N Korea, was a net gain for the US? Follow-up question: what, exactly, was your reaction when Obama said during the campaign that he'd meet with N Korean leaders with no preconditions (which is exactly what Donald did)?
 
JackDallas said:
Here is your answer in the other thread:

SPAM: Those people live in horrible conditions under a dictator. Even so, I would not want to see the people of this country spill their blood to free them.

I would take Trump generated action that would lead to their peace and denuclearization in a heart beat.

That being said, I would also want to see the Kim family resign and go into hiding. Which is just about as likely as Trump getting them to denuclearize.

Why do you ask ?
JD: I ask because I wanted to see if Liberals would answer honestly. The Liberal Piss-Stream Media have made it clear that they are betting heavily on failure of this peace effort by President Trump. They have to know that North Korea is going to de-nuclearize, one way or the other. Trump has made that clear. We can no longer live under that threat. The Media must know that if the peace effort fails it will almost certainly lead to war or at least some sort of military action that will put Americans in harm's way.
Thanks for coming down on the right side of things. I will accept that you are being honest.
Click to expand...

Nobody except his chumps and sucker are buying his bs. Anyone with any common sense can see that he's full of it. Time and time again you guys get your hopes up that he become a normal functioning POTUS. You thought that when it came to the general election, then you believe that once he was elected it would happen, then once he was sworn in. Now you try to ignore that he isn't and expect everyone else to ignore it too.

NO !

Do expect anyone except the faithful to try and normalize his behavior, or to put any trust in someone who constant lies and engages in obvious hucksterism. You can keep hoping that someday you'll get to kick that football, Charlie Brown but you're gonna have to count some of us out in that regard.
 
JackDallas said:
Here is your answer in the other thread:

SPAM: Those people live in horrible conditions under a dictator. Even so, I would not want to see the people of this country spill their blood to free them.

I would take Trump generated action that would lead to their peace and denuclearization in a heart beat.

That being said, I would also want to see the Kim family resign and go into hiding. Which is just about as likely as Trump getting them to denuclearize.

Why do you ask ?
JD: I ask because I wanted to see if Liberals would answer honestly. The Liberal Piss-Stream Media have made it clear that they are betting heavily on failure of this peace effort by President Trump. They have to know that North Korea is going to de-nuclearize, one way or the other. Trump has made that clear. We can no longer live under that threat. The Media must know that if the peace effort fails it will almost certainly lead to war or at least some sort of military action that will put Americans in harm's way.
Thanks for coming down on the right side of things. I will accept that you are being honest.
Click to expand...
The main stream media isn't betting on failure. They're predicting it. Rightly given N Korea's history on this score.
 
BobbyT said:
Of course I would not prefer war over peace, what an incredibly stupid question. Why do you think we were concerned about Donald's bellicose rhetoric about "Rocket Man" and his other childish threats that resulted in a N Korean nuclear threat to Hawaii? Here's a return question: do you actually think this photo op that raised KJU's international profile and gave him endless propaganda to feed the people under his murderous totalitarian rule and a promise to end our military exercises in S Korea (which afforded significant intelligence collection opportunities for the US, particularly SIGINT), but provided exactly zero advantage for the US and zero means of expecting or enforcing any nuclear drawdown by N Korea, was a net gain for the US? Follow-up question: what, exactly, was your reaction when Obama said during the campaign that he'd meet with N Korean leaders with no preconditions (which is exactly what Donald did)?
Click to expand...
Is that the closest you'll ever get to giving Trump a compliment?
 
RickWA said:
LOL! Paid$y issuing proper posting specifications again.

Kojack as hairstylist, Elmer Fudd as speech therapist, George Wallace as human rights commissioner, etc, etc.
Click to expand...

Just not true. I fully support one’s right to post juvenile idiocy. A right you take full advantage of just about every time you post.

;-)
 
Spamature said:
He pulled off the greatest scam in history when he took 60 million suckers for a ride.

How's that ?
Click to expand...
There there.

tenor.gif
 
I don't think there is anyone who prefers war over peace - except the warhawks/ Bush/ most of the bought by the military contractors politicians and especially walrus boy Bolton - in Trumps own cabinet - so add the right wingers to your vote poll
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top