New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Repugnants: AWWWK -- the president has no sequester plan!!

Why didnt I think of quoting media matters...so I would look unbiased...and factual...but BO-4 is right the President has a plan...rasie the debt ceiling, spend more money and basically that is it...has anyone divided 88 billion from 3.6 trillion or 88 billion from 16 trillion...the interest payments on the debt would have to one half of a percent to incur no increase on the debt. Not a good or viable plan if any plan at all...when these four years are done.... the debt will be about 20 trillion or more.
 
Quit pretending you care about debt. It's thinner than your charade about Jim Crow.

azfacts.com_sites_all_files_image_debt_US_national_debt_GDP.png
 
The fact is that Reagan's increase in spending and tax cuts were much like Obama's. Republicans won't agree, but in fact he was engaged in a stimulus program....
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
David Brooks even told that GOP Big Lie in his NYT column and then had to retract it.

Better than most Pugs, I suppose, since most of them just keep telling it, but the NYT should still fire his lyin' ass.
Click to expand...

As a "moderate Republican" Brooks is probably seeing his readership fall off and figured he needed to dutifully teabag a few of the nuts. :D
 
He doesn't need one.

Let it happen.

Then we'll all see what a big fat fear mongerer he is when the world doesn't end.

It's a MEASLY 85 Billion cut OVER BASELINE...which means...it's not a freaking cut.

He's a big fat liar.
 
Fortunately most Americans don't hate Government like Libertarian types do....Some sort of deal will be made
 
Well CB, you sound like Ron Paul, but we shall see. I tend to believe that many people smarter than either you or i have studied the situation.

But bombs away i guess.. and GUESS who's gonna get the blame if those smart people are right?
 
Corruptbuddha said:
I don't care who gets the "blame". Its not going to be as bad as these a-holes want us to beleive.
Click to expand...

Yep, you sound like young Rand. ;-)

Good luck with that. Forget about Head Start and hungry kids (most Republicans don't care about those programs)... hope you don't need to fly anytime next year.
 
Corruptbuddha said:
None of those programs will suffer in the least.

Obama and the pugs have got you scared senseless.

I ain't buying.
Click to expand...

Recall that the discretionary and defense portions of the budget would be cut by nearly 10% each. With the cuts to take place over 8 months, bringing the cuts closer to 15% annualized.

How can you convince yourself that it won't cause massive pain, huge job losses and other serious harm to the economy?

Remarkable.
 
Read this carefully:

There are NO cuts. What there are are DECREASES IN INCREASES.

Get that?

The money that was spent last year WILL STILL BE SPENT.

This will NOT cause 'massive pain'.
 
Corruptbuddha said:
Read this carefully:

There are NO cuts. What there are are DECREASES IN INCREASES.

Get that?

The money that was spent last year WILL STILL BE SPENT.

This will NOT cause 'massive pain'.
Click to expand...

Your semantics are noted. They are cuts to the spending that was expected to occur.

Your semantics out of the way, do you have any comment on my question?
 
Your 'question' supposes a 'cut' (your word) of 10-15% which isn't a CUT at all, more a decrease in the size of the increase.

Thus your question is political doublespeak.

There will be NO CUTS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top