New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Roger Stone Will Get a Mistrial Thanks to Tomeka Hart

sensible don

Mayor
Supporting Member
I am going with the fact that she was allowed on the jury. Really proof in itself. It she had admitted to her Political bias, she would have been excused from being on the jury.
She ran for a democratic congressional seat and Stone's lawyers were to dumb to do a google search on her, wow that speaks volumes now doesn't it.
 

sensible don

Mayor
Supporting Member
She will not be proven guilty unless charged. Her online history clearly shows she lied about impartiality and that all attorneys present failed to check the juror and that stone was denied a fair trisl
fat chance that happens, until VP Trump* puts his obese finger on the scales of justice once again and your righties will luv dem sum Donald Trump* justece
 

TBLee

Mayor
So know rebuttal to the campaign being a " secret event" and Stone's lawyers being dumber than dirt
I don't know a thing about Stone's lawyer. Feel free to provide any documented evidence to back of your claim that he/she is "dumber than dirt", or was it just your biased "opinion"? :p
 

sensible don

Mayor
Supporting Member
So she is a black woman, so we all know what that means - she will be the new bogeyman for a few days - you righties always have to have a minority/ female person after you and she gets the double treatment, melting your snowflake exterior

Obviously there is nothing VP Trump can say or do that you righties won't defend LMAO at your lack of morals and ethics - go down yet another rabbit hole with him
 

TBLee

Mayor
So she is a black woman, so we all know what that means - she will be the new bogeyman for a few days - you righties always have to have a minority/ female person after you and she gets the double treatment, melting your snowflake exterior

Obviously there is nothing VP Trump can say or do that you righties won't defend LMAO at your lack of morals and ethics - go down yet another rabbit hole with him
Because she is a "black" woman? Wow...it took you a lot of posts to bring race into this thread. Shocker...
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
It doesn't work like that. You need to need to be convicted to be proven guilty, not just charged.

No it doesn't. Her online history show nothing about her actions as a juror.
Her online history shows that she was aware and highly opinionated of Stone. This disqualifies her as a juror. We shall soon see how deep state the judge is as he must now declare a mistrial.

Again once upon a time I was a jury Forman myself and actually determined after the trial that the trial was unfair because I was not allowed a dictionary. You are not allowed to have a dictionary because the courts forbid people to know word meanings.

Again prove me wrong
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
She ran for a democratic congressional seat and Stone's lawyers were to dumb to do a google search on her, wow that speaks volumes now doesn't it.
Stones lawyers probably did search her, it's the other sides job to remove her because now that Stone is found guilty he gets a mistrial,

Genius pure genius
 
NO SHE DIDN'T, IT WAS ALL OUT THERE FOR ANYONE TO SEE, KIND OF HARD TO KEEP A POLITCAL CAMPAIGN A SECRET - OH WAIT YOU DIDN'T KNOW THAT ?

View attachment 48444
So the judge and everybody else were supposed to remember a partisan who ran 8 years ago? Methinks those who forgot were the evil prosecutors working for Mueller who put here there on purpose.
And no Don, only the people in her district would know. Do you know who my Congressman is? No. There is no reason why you would.
 

MrMike

Life matters
The frothy Democrat activists keep shooting themselves in the foot at every turn...

I'm pleased they don't seem to have an ounce of common sense.
 
I disagree, I believe she was actively involved in expressing her dislike of Trump, too bad she wasn't honest and forthcoming about it during her Jury interview. If she has been, she would not have been allowed to serve on the jury, let alone be the jury foreman.
This is yet another example of the Democrats shooting themselves in the foot because they literally can't do ANYTHING honestly. It ALWAYS has to be corrupt.
 

EatTheRich

President
So the judge and everybody else were supposed to remember a partisan who ran 8 years ago? Methinks those who forgot were the evil prosecutors working for Mueller who put here there on purpose.
And no Don, only the people in her district would know. Do you know who my Congressman is? No. There is no reason why you would.
The prosecutors don’t select the members of the jury (although they, like the defense, can disqualify a number of jury members). The trial was held in her district. There is no evidence she lied during the voir dire.
 
Top