New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Romney "redistribution" attack gets Four Pinnochios!

TomFitz

Mayor
Nothing quite illustrates the flailing nature of the Romney campaign more than it's weak attempt to revive yet another tired old right wing talking point.

His opposition research people found some audio on which the future president said the word "redistribution", edited it, and fed it to Matt Drudge. Drudge, never one for responsible reporting, and clearly on board with the GOP, fed it out to the right wing blogoshere, where it quickly became today's talking point.

Of course it took only a few hours for the real media to fact check this, and expose the fact that what Obama was talking about in that video was not redistributing wealth, but redistributing government services so that they were apportioned evenly.

The Post gave it Four Pinnochios!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...0d5c80-0342-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_video.html
 
They had to rush out something "quick and dirty"....REALLY DIRTY (i.e. edited to hell)....to try to create their own "Romney 47% video" and muddy the waters.

Typical Rovian tactic. It also gave Rightwing bloggers something to post...and then when exposed for a LIE....to "forget".
 
It is a typical Rovian tactic. Even the way it was fed into the right wing media is typical.

Fortunately, the corporate media is doing more due diligence over these things, and not letting them sit out there the way they let the Swift Boat lie fester.

Conservatives and the GOP aren't used to that.
 
That is complete BS. He was most certainly NOT talking about "redistributing government services." He was most certainly talking about redistribution of wealth.
 
Some haven't even dropped it...Lukey tried to "I like redistribution" TODAY....well after it had been shown that the tape was doctored and that what the President said had nothing to do with "redistributing wealth".

Of course he's the guy who admitted he would NEVER believe ANY poll that showed the President ahead of Romney was accurate or "relevant". :)
 
Out of context Mittens

[video=youtube;5X3LGAXVd80]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X3LGAXVd80&feature=player_embedded[/video]
 
Back
Top