SCOTUS cons to decide whether to take away our democracy

[Bugsy McGurk]

The arguments in the case are on 12/7/22. The issue is whether state legislatures can pass election laws, like gerrymandering, without regard to what state Constitutions or state courts say, and with governors having no veto power.

Even conservative scholars have said the theory behind the case is frivolous, but four SCOTUS cons have previously accepted the theory.

Want a country where a state legislature decides a presidential election instead of the voters? Root for the wackos who brought this case…

The deranged Supreme Court case that threatens US democracy, explained — Vox

Moore v. Harper is a test of whether this Supreme Court can ever be trusted with power.

apple.news

 

[saltydancin]

The arguments in the case are on 12/7/22. The issue is whether state legislatures can pass election laws, like gerrymandering, without regard to what state Constitutions or state courts say, and with governors having no veto power.

Even conservative scholars have said the theory behind the case is frivolous, but four SCOTUS cons have previously accepted the theory.

Want a country where a state legislature decides a presidential election instead of the voters? Root for the wackos who brought this case…

The deranged Supreme Court case that threatens US democracy, explained — Vox

Moore v. Harper is a test of whether this Supreme Court can ever be trusted with power.

apple.news

As it took some 600 to 800 years for an Islam human reproduction medical pseudoscience fabricated virgin Mary misnomer immaculate son of Allah Jesus the Christ conception for Mohammed dhimmitude servitude pedophilia just as decades of Byrd's West Nazi Germany Virginia KKK churchstate thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists to have granted standing from SCOTUS as "one nation under God with equal justice under law".

 

[sensible don]

The arguments in the case are on 12/7/22. The issue is whether state legislatures can pass election laws, like gerrymandering, without regard to what state Constitutions or state courts say, and with governors having no veto power.

Even conservative scholars have said the theory behind the case is frivolous, but four SCOTUS cons have previously accepted the theory.

Want a country where a state legislature decides a presidential election instead of the voters? Root for the wackos who brought this case…

The deranged Supreme Court case that threatens US democracy, explained — Vox

Moore v. Harper is a test of whether this Supreme Court can ever be trusted with power.

apple.news

They don't even want elections anymore, c'mon man - the greatest loser put it in black and white for all to see !

whoot whoot !

 

[sensible don]

As it took some 600 to 800 years for an Islam human reproduction medical pseudoscience fabricated virgin Mary misnomer immaculate son of Allah Jesus the Christ conception for Mohammed dhimmitude servitude pedophilia just as decades of Byrd's West Nazi Germany Virginia KKK churchstate thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists to have granted standing from SCOTUS as "one nation under God with equal justice under law".

so glad this makes sense to you.......... hahahahaha

 

[Number_58]

I disagree with the Moore case as vehemently as I disagree with the Democrat Senate's push to completely federalize elections. Both are absolute violations of the Constitution.

Sen. Chuck Schumer Attacks State Election Integrity Laws Before Making Push for Federal Control

Typical Democrat.

thefederalistpapers.org

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I disagree with the Moore case as vehemently as I disagree with the Democrat Senate's push to completely federalize elections. Both are absolute violations of the Constitution.

Sen. Chuck Schumer Attacks State Election Integrity Laws Before Making Push for Federal Control

Typical Democrat.

thefederalistpapers.org

Well, you’re half right, but there is no “Democrat Senate push to completely federalize elections.” That was a particularly bizarre lie.

 

[Number_58]

Well, you’re half right, but there is no “Democrat Senate push to completely federalize elections.” That was a particularly bizarre lie.

HR1 and SR1 last year deemed otherwise...

Appears you're okay with one branch of the government dictating to each state what they can or can't do with their constitutionally protect ability to govern election processes...just not one of the others.

White House to drop effort to federalize elections in favor of state approach | Washington Examiner

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

HR1 and SR1 last year deemed otherwise...

Appears you're okay with one branch of the government dictating to each state what they can or can't do with their constitutionally protect ability to govern election processes...just not one of the others.

White House to drop effort to federalize elections in favor of state approach | Washington Examiner

Yikes. You point to a June 2021 article about Biden rejecting federalization of elections to “prove” that the Dems want to federalize elections. That’s downright psychotic.

Anyway, back to the topic, the SCOTUS will decide in this case whether the voters of America will continue to choose the winners through elections.

 

[Number_58]

Yikes. You point to a June 2021 article about Biden rejecting federalization of elections to “prove” that the Dems want to federalize elections. That’s downright psychotic.

Anyway, back to the topic, the SCOTUS will decide in this case whether the voters of America will continue to choose the winners through elections.

Same topic; different branches attempting to interfere with states' rights. Biden didn't reject it...he pushed for it and gave up when the Democrats couldn't get the 60 votes in the Senate.

Democrats in the House passed the coup to unconstitutionally federalize (nationalize) the voting rules and steal that Constitutional guarantee away from the states. Proving Democrats = fascists.

Appears your reading comprehension is on failing you...again.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Same topic; different branches attempting to interfere with states' rights. Biden didn't reject it...he pushed for it and gave up when the Democrats couldn't get the 60 votes in the Senate.

Democrats in the House passed the coup to unconstitutionally federalize (nationalize) the voting rules and steal that Constitutional guarantee away from the states. Proving Democrats = fascists.

Appears your reading comprehension is on failing you...again.

Again, your absurd lie is off-topic. Please try to keep your lies on-topic.

 

[Dawg]

Biden has already taken away Democracy

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[saltydancin]

so glad this makes sense to you.......... hahahahaha

After some 50 years since this Christian Nation SCOTUS interpretation of "one nation under God with equal justice under law" only includes Islam human reproduction medical pseudoscience fabricated virgin Mary misnomer immaculate Jeus the Christ son of Allah conception in it's supreme swastika up Uranus kangaroo court Christiananality pedophilia suicidal super ego sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming as evidenced by 9/11 Mohammed pedophilia....

 

[write on]

The arguments in the case are on 12/7/22. The issue is whether state legislatures can pass election laws, like gerrymandering, without regard to what state Constitutions or state courts say, and with governors having no veto power.

Even conservative scholars have said the theory behind the case is frivolous, but four SCOTUS cons have previously accepted the theory.

Want a country where a state legislature decides a presidential election instead of the voters? Root for the wackos who brought this case…

The deranged Supreme Court case that threatens US democracy, explained — Vox

Moore v. Harper is a test of whether this Supreme Court can ever be trusted with power.

apple.news

This is scary as hell- but not a surprise. Trump calling for the termination of the Constitution is becoming more clear now, isn't it?

From another article on the subject;

“The idea here is that you are trying to bring back a sense of democracy to the process by making sure that the people who are writing our election laws are the people we elect to do that,” said Jason Snead, executive director of the conservative Honest Elections Project."

WTH

At least there are some sane Republicans that see this as the attempted dictatorship that it is.

"The stakes in the case have prompted an outpouring of outside briefs. Those urging a ruling against the North Carolina Republicans include several high-profile conservatives: retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi and longtime Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg, who was one of Bush’s top attorneys in 2000.

Ginsberg said the latest arguments go well beyond what was at issue in Bush v. Gore, which he said involved the Florida Supreme Court changing the election laws after the voting was over. Ginsberg said in court papers that adoption of the sweeping GOP approach toward the independent state legislature theory would exacerbate existing distrust in the election system at a fragile moment.

“The possible consequences of injecting so much doubt and confusion into our electoral system are severe,” Ginsberg wrote. “Now is a particularly tenuous time to launch a novel experiment with our democracy based on a novel reading of previously settled law."

A Redistricting Case at the Supreme Court May Overhaul Elections

The US Supreme Court is poised to consider a far-reaching constitutional argument that would give state lawmakers broad power to set the rules for federal elections in a dispute with roots in bitter controversies over the 2000 and 2020 presidential races.

news.bloomberglaw.com

 

[write on]

After reading this WaPost article, it seems that there are different opinions in the Federalist Society camp between Michael Luttig and Leonard Leo.

Who is Leonard Leo?

Leonard Leo helped conservative nonprofits raise $250 million from mostly undisclosed donors in recent years to promote conservative judges and causes

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/investigations/leonard-leo-federalists-society-courts/?utm_term=.1d2008ed2d75

 

[saltydancin]

This is scary as hell- but not a surprise. Trump calling for the termination of the Constitution is becoming more clear now, isn't it?

From another article on the subject;

“The idea here is that you are trying to bring back a sense of democracy to the process by making sure that the people who are writing our election laws are the people we elect to do that,” said Jason Snead, executive director of the conservative Honest Elections Project."

WTH

At least there are some sane Republicans that see this as the attempted dictatorship that it is.

"The stakes in the case have prompted an outpouring of outside briefs. Those urging a ruling against the North Carolina Republicans include several high-profile conservatives: retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi and longtime Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg, who was one of Bush’s top attorneys in 2000.

Ginsberg said the latest arguments go well beyond what was at issue in Bush v. Gore, which he said involved the Florida Supreme Court changing the election laws after the voting was over. Ginsberg said in court papers that adoption of the sweeping GOP approach toward the independent state legislature theory would exacerbate existing distrust in the election system at a fragile moment.

“The possible consequences of injecting so much doubt and confusion into our electoral system are severe,” Ginsberg wrote. “Now is a particularly tenuous time to launch a novel experiment with our democracy based on a novel reading of previously settled law."

A Redistricting Case at the Supreme Court May Overhaul Elections

The US Supreme Court is poised to consider a far-reaching constitutional argument that would give state lawmakers broad power to set the rules for federal elections in a dispute with roots in bitter controversies over the 2000 and 2020 presidential races.

news.bloomberglaw.com

Yet another of those Church of Christiananality pedophilia suicidal super egos where if one cross is a swastika then all the crosses are swastikas representing Mohammed pedophilia behavior in sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming as this Christian Nation national 9/11 Islamidiotocracy religion interpretation of "one nation under God with equal justice under law"....

 

[RickWA]

As it took some 600 to 800 years for an Islam human reproduction medical pseudoscience fabricated virgin Mary misnomer immaculate son of Allah Jesus the Christ conception for Mohammed dhimmitude servitude pedophilia just as decades of Byrd's West Nazi Germany Virginia KKK churchstate thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists to have granted standing from SCOTUS as "one nation under God with equal justice under law".

So who came up with the idea to put artichoke hearts on pizza? That’s nuts. Folks piss and moan about anchovies, but at least that’s not weirdo hippie food. And why are artichoke hearts ALWAYS pickled? It’s like federal law or something…

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Update on today’s SCOTUS oral argument….

Supreme Court seems poised to reject robust reading of ‘independent state legislature’ theory — POLITICO

John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett are the key justices to watch in a case that could allow state legislatures to bypass courts on election rules.

apple.news

It looks good for our democracy surviving this SCOTUS case, but stay tuned.

 

[saltydancin]

So who came up with the idea to put artichoke hearts on pizza? That’s nuts. Folks piss and moan about anchovies, but at least that’s not weirdo hippie food. And why are artichoke hearts ALWAYS pickled? It’s like federal law or something…

So basically since the Bicentennial SCOTUS "one nation under God with equal justice under law" demagogeury of 600 - 800 years old Islam human reproduction medical pseudoscience is the only food for thought in this Christian Nation avoidance - acceptance interpretation of democracy under color of law as Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom drug trafficking Christiananality pedophilia enforcement evidenced for 9/11 Mohammed pedophilia....no wonder women have to wear hajibs in dhimmitude servitude.....or USA citizens have to tolerate those crooks on Capital Hill Peter Principle pyramid scheme of suicidal super egos sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming.

 

[saltydancin]

Update on today’s SCOTUS oral argument….

Supreme Court seems poised to reject robust reading of ‘independent state legislature’ theory — POLITICO

John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Barrett are the key justices to watch in a case that could allow state legislatures to bypass courts on election rules.

apple.news

It looks good for our democracy surviving this SCOTUS case, but stay tuned.

SCOTUS dissolved the democracy long before the Bicentennial as Islam Mohammed pedophilia of human reproduction medical pseudoscience established Christiananlity pedophilia thieving National Archives purchased US Constitution Bill of Rights - old glory - old testament - absentee voting ballots arsonists as law of the land.