Sekulow rant...

[middleview]

He is now arguing that if the additional witnesses are called then he wants to add all of the witnesses who appeared before the House Intelligence committee. He pretends as though "Hey...the democrats had these witnesses....if there are additional witnesses then I get to call all of these people" implying that republicans didn't get to ask questions and were not afforded the exact same amount of time to do so as the democrats.

This is simply a threat intended to give republicans cover if they vote against calling witnesses that would allow them to know more of the story.

 

[Fast Eddy]

He is now arguing that if the additional witnesses are called then he wants to add all of the witnesses who appeared before the House Intelligence committee. He pretends as though "Hey...the democrats had these witnesses....if there are additional witnesses then I get to call all of these people" implying that republicans didn't get to ask questions and were not afforded the exact same amount of time to do so as the democrats.

This is simply a threat intended to give republicans cover if they vote against calling witnesses that would allow them to know more of the story.

You sure just see one side of an issue. Right now it stands 17-0 that democrats have called witnesses a zero for republican. They allowed no witnesses to be called in the House and now they are in the Senate and want the same thing. Anyone with an IQ over 3 would see how blatantly unfair this is. To even things out they should call 17 Republican witnesses and zero democratic ones.
Just end the whole damn farce.

 

[ObamacareForever]

You sure just see one side of an issue. Right now it stands 17-0 that democrats have called witnesses a zero for republican. They allowed no witnesses to be called in the House and now they are in the Senate and want the same thing. Anyone with an IQ over 3 would see how blatantly unfair this is. To even things out they should call 17 Republican witnesses and zero democratic ones.
Just end the whole damn farce.

Politics aren't "fair".

 

[marvin martian]

You sure just see one side of an issue. Right now it stands 17-0 that democrats have called witnesses a zero for republican. They allowed no witnesses to be called in the House and now they are in the Senate and want the same thing. Anyone with an IQ over 3 would see how blatantly unfair this is. To even things out they should call 17 Republican witnesses and zero democratic ones.
Just end the whole damn farce.

I refuse to believe the leftnuts are this stupid. They must be just lying.

 

[marvin martian]

Politics aren't "fair".

Indeed, as is about to made painfully clear to you.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Indeed, as is about to made painfully clear to you.

It's all coming full circle when Bolton gets in front of the house and tells everybody where Trump's pee pee tape is.

 

[marvin martian]

It's all coming full circle when Bolton gets in front of the house and tells everybody where Trump's pee pee tape is.

Want to bet?

 

[ObamacareForever]

Want to bet?

I don't gamble with Russians collaborators.

 

[Fast Eddy]

Politics aren't "fair".

So why are you bitching?

 

[ObamacareForever]

So why are you bitching?

Anyone with an IQ over 3 would see how blatantly unfair this is.

That would be you bitching about fairness.

 

[marvin martian]

I don't gamble with Russians collaborators.

I'll put you down for chickenshit again, thanks.

 

[ObamacareForever]

I'll put you down for chickenshit again, thanks.

I'll put you down you as a Russian troll, making paid trolls for the IRA.

 

[Fast Eddy]

That would be you bitching about fairness.

You were there the one who started the whining session, bucko! I was responding to your bitching, whining BS. I just pointed out the facts in relation to your rant.

 

[ObamacareForever]

You were there the one who started the whining session, bucko! I was responding to your bitching, whining BS. I just pointed out the facts in relation to your rant.

Try re-reading the thread. You are going to find yourself bitching about fairness before I even responded.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

I refuse to believe the leftnuts are this stupid. They must be just lying.

Butthurt does this to us.
Schiff will be in a straight jacket inside of 48 hours.

 

[Fast Eddy]

Try re-reading the thread. You are going to find yourself bitching about fairness before I even responded.

My first post was relating to your bitching. God, get a clue!

 

[middleview]

You sure just see one side of an issue. Right now it stands 17-0 that democrats have called witnesses a zero for republican. They allowed no witnesses to be called in the House and now they are in the Senate and want the same thing. Anyone with an IQ over 3 would see how blatantly unfair this is. To even things out they should call 17 Republican witnesses and zero democratic ones.
Just end the whole damn farce.

Who did the republicans want to call and why?
Schiff. What the hell could he testify to? Who the WB is?

Pelosi? She didn't have anything to do with Trump's phone call. She was not involved in trying to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump.

Biden. Same as Pelosi. He didn't talk to Zelensky. He didn't talk to Giuliani. He had nothing to do with withholding a congressional appropriation.

The republicans called four witnesses of the 17.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Republicans vote against witnesses, maintain the cover up.
Republicans give us Trump dictatorship.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

Who did the republicans want to call and why?
Schiff. What the hell could he testify to? Who the WB is?

Pelosi? She didn't have anything to do with Trump's phone call. She was not involved in trying to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump.

Biden. Same as Pelosi. He didn't talk to Zelensky. He didn't talk to Giuliani. He had nothing to do with withholding a congressional appropriation.

The republicans called four witnesses of the 17.

Schiff is absolutely a material witness, as is "the whistle blower" and Vindman, in fact, both Vindmans (among others).

I want to know how long they had been working together (conspiring) to find something, anything, that they could use in an impeachment inquiry. The more we find out about this whole effort to unseat Trump the more corrupt it seems:

"There are allegations that they actually plotted together as much as a year or two ago to say that 'we've got to bring this president down,'" Paul revealed. "So it's kind of extraordinary all the people who actually came to the National Security Council. I count maybe 6 people who know each other really well. So you've got Sean Misko, two other people on Adam Schiff's team from the National Security Council, all activist Democrats who used to be in the National Security Council. You've got the Vindman, Lt. Col. [Alexander] Vindman and his brother. So there's two Vindmans. They're over at the National Security Council and this fellow Eric Ciaramella. So you've got 6 people who know each other and the question is: Wouldn't we want to know if they've been discussing for maybe months a plan to bring the president down once they got a chance?"

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...tted_for_over_a_year_to_bring_down_trump.html

I would love to explore whether Schiff (or more accurately, his staff) were part of this conspiracy.

 

[middleview]

Schiff is absolutely a material witness, as is "the whistle blower" and Vindman, in fact, both Vindmans (among others).

I want to know how long they had been working together (conspiring) to find something, anything, that they could use in an impeachment inquiry. The more we find out about this whole effort to unseat Trump the more corrupt it seems:

"There are allegations that they actually plotted together as much as a year or two ago to say that 'we've got to bring this president down,'" Paul revealed. "So it's kind of extraordinary all the people who actually came to the National Security Council. I count maybe 6 people who know each other really well. So you've got Sean Misko, two other people on Adam Schiff's team from the National Security Council, all activist Democrats who used to be in the National Security Council. You've got the Vindman, Lt. Col. [Alexander] Vindman and his brother. So there's two Vindmans. They're over at the National Security Council and this fellow Eric Ciaramella. So you've got 6 people who know each other and the question is: Wouldn't we want to know if they've been discussing for maybe months a plan to bring the president down once they got a chance?"

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...tted_for_over_a_year_to_bring_down_trump.html

I would love to explore whether Schiff (or more accurately, his staff) were part of this conspiracy.

Wow...the very nerve of those people..."Knowing each other".