New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Seriously?!

There is nothing to be gained by killing him in retribution. It isn't even going to be an effective deterrent. And trying him after he has confessed and is willing to take life in prison without possibility of parole would be a gigantic waste of time and money.
So would sheltering and feeding him for 60+ years.
 
Something slow and painful would be okay. If they need help I can make myself available.
 
So would sheltering and feeding him for 60+ years.

Actually, no. It is less expensive to shelter and feed him for 60 years than prosecute a death penalty case. It will cost MILLIONS of dollars to prosecute this case. MILLIONS. Then it will costs millions to appeal it for the next 20 years all the way to the SCOTUS. Meanwhile he could get off from any number of technicalities or problems with the case or evidence, or found mentally deficient enough to not be able to stand trail.

The most practical and least costly way to handle this is let him plead guilty and get life without parole.
 
Actually, no. It is less expensive to shelter and feed him for 60 years than prosecute a death penalty case. It will cost MILLIONS of dollars to prosecute this case. MILLIONS. Then it will costs millions to appeal it for the next 20 years all the way to the SCOTUS. Meanwhile he could get off from any number of technicalities or problems with the case or evidence, or found mentally deficient enough to not be able to stand trail.

The most practical and least costly way to handle this is let him plead guilty and get life without parole.

The prison bus could back over him accidentally a couple of times.
 
Back
Top