New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Shoot 'em

Boltlady

Governor
They don't need to shoot to kill. Some well placed marksmen could wound a few of them with real bullets as they are blatantly stealing and doing serious damage to police cars and businesses. That would get their attention and maybe even a modicum of respect.

BTW I'm not talking about people who may be honestly protesting. I'm talking about shooting the thugs who have been brought in to create the damage and chaos.
 
They don't need to shoot to kill. Some well placed marksmen could wound a few of them with real bullets as they are blatantly stealing and doing serious damage to police cars and businesses. That would get their attention and maybe even a modicum of respect.

BTW I'm not talking about people who may be honestly protesting. I'm talking about shooting the thugs who have been brought in to create the damage and chaos.
Maybe one of the three other cops watching one of their own kill an unarmed, hand cuffed, black man, should have shot the cop kneeling on the guys neck?

You agree?

Should the other cops have at least stopped their fellow cop, and arrested him, instead of watching him kill a hand cuffed man?
 
They don't need to shoot to kill. Some well placed marksmen could wound a few of them with real bullets as they are blatantly stealing and doing serious damage to police cars and businesses. That would get their attention and maybe even a modicum of respect.

BTW I'm not talking about people who may be honestly protesting. I'm talking about shooting the thugs who have been brought in to create the damage and chaos.

I don't disagree. If these animals were destroying their own stuff, I really wouldn't care, but they are destroying the livelihoods of hundreds, as well as killing people. I think deadly force would be appropriate at this point.
 
Maybe one of the three other cops watching one of their own kill an unarmed, hand cuffed, black man, should have shot the cop kneeling on the guys neck?

You agree?

Should the other cops have at least stopped their fellow cop, and arrested him, instead of watching him kill a hand cuffed man?

Yes. They should have.

They need to be jailed.
 
I don't disagree. If these animals were destroying their own stuff, I really wouldn't care, but they are destroying the livelihoods of hundreds, as well as killing people. I think deadly force would be appropriate at this point.
one cop killed a hand cuffed man. three others watched.

Would it have been appropriate for those three to have used deadly force and shot the cop kneeling in the guys neck?
 
Maybe one of the three other cops watching one of their own kill an unarmed, hand cuffed, black man, should have shot the cop kneeling on the guys neck?

You agree?

Should the other cops have at least stopped their fellow cop, and arrested him, instead of watching him kill a hand cuffed man?

In that case one of the other cops could have simply knocked him over to get him off of the man's neck. The fact that they didn't makes them as guilty as the one being charged.
 
one cop killed a hand cuffed man. three others watched.

Would it have been appropriate for those three to have used deadly force and shot the cop kneeling in the guys neck?

which one, the Black, the Asian or the Latino?
 
They don't need to shoot to kill. Some well placed marksmen could wound a few of them with real bullets as they are blatantly stealing and doing serious damage to police cars and businesses. That would get their attention and maybe even a modicum of respect.

BTW I'm not talking about people who may be honestly protesting. I'm talking about shooting the thugs who have been brought in to create the damage and chaos.
I wholeheartedly disagree, shoot to kill, a harsh lesson is quickly learned.
 
They don't need to shoot to kill. Some well placed marksmen could wound a few of them with real bullets as they are blatantly stealing and doing serious damage to police cars and businesses. That would get their attention and maybe even a modicum of respect.

BTW I'm not talking about people who may be honestly protesting. I'm talking about shooting the thugs who have been brought in to create the damage and chaos.

Yes, a sword doesn't work
 
In that case one of the other cops could have simply knocked him over to get him off of the man's neck. The fact that they didn't makes them as guilty as the one being charged.
Right, maybe they could just knock over any rioter stealing or whatever. Why advocate shooting people for stealing but not for killing a hand cuffed man?
 
Right, maybe they could just knock over any rioter stealing or whatever. Why advocate shooting people for stealing but not for killing a hand cuffed man?

Which one you going to knock over?


I guess social distancing is demanded any longer!

In Cali (Beverly Hills) they have a EAT THE RICH movement, who they going to knock over?
 
Which one you going to knock over?


I guess social distancing is demanded any longer!

In Cali (Beverly Hills) they have a EAT THE RICH movement, who they going to knock over?
if you don't want to answer my question fine, but don't change the subject.
 
one cop killed a hand cuffed man. three others watched.

Would it have been appropriate for those three to have used deadly force and shot the cop kneeling in the guys neck?

I think, under the right circumstances, it would have been. If the cop was killing this man and he refused to follow a command from one of the others to let up, then I think pulling a gun would have been appropriate.

But that is the past. We have animals out there destroying people's property and killing people. Deadly force should be an option.
 
Back
Top