Simple solution to correct election problems
- Thread starter Dawg
- Start date
ObamacareForever
Senator
Let's all just get a number tattooed to our arms while we're at it.simple
your college education was a waste of parents money
re-read that shit you posted boy!
works perfect for banks
hell, I can pay for a meal and within seconds approved
ObamacareForever
Senator
So What?
So what......when voting ended at 8pm...…...by 8:01 there would be no wondering who won
ObamacareForever
Senator
It's unconstitutional to require it to vote.
WTF.get your ass off here and attend to your new baby and Cambodian baby mama...………...of course you lust for dem/lib voter fraud
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/breaking-altered-election-docs-found-can-linked-fl-dem-party/
ObamacareForever
Senator
Even if voter fraud it existed, it isn't a justification for denying people their constitutional rights.
ObamacareForever
Senator
What is required by the constition to vote?
Be older than 18.
Nobody can just add criteria to vote, that isn't in the constitution.
sear
Mayor
OF #10
I refer you to Art.6 Sect.2, and the 9th & 10th Amendments.
There's absolutely no stipulation in the Constitution authorizing our members of congress to wear pants, or clothing of any kind.
There is no explicit Constitutional prohibition against it.
And when I was 15 the voting age was 21.
Nixon lowered it to 18, to shed the heat against his critics that said:
- we're old enough to die for our country at 18,
- but we're not old enough to vote against the war you're killing us with until we're 21!
So Dickster the Trickster dropped the vote age from 21 to 18.
Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18.
You're referring to Amendment #26.
ARTICLE #26: Ratified July 1, 1971
SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United states, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United states or by any State on account of age.
That's fine.
BUT !!
You're overlooking Sect.2
We ALREADY have voter registration.
Why not at the time the voter registers, document the registration by administering a forgery resistant ID, with biometric double-check?
Our Constitution doesn't exclude ID. It merely enumerates that if the ID is implemented, the voter verify age 18.
I refer you to Art.6 Sect.2, and the 9th & 10th Amendments.
There's absolutely no stipulation in the Constitution authorizing our members of congress to wear pants, or clothing of any kind.
There is no explicit Constitutional prohibition against it.
And when I was 15 the voting age was 21.
Nixon lowered it to 18, to shed the heat against his critics that said:
- we're old enough to die for our country at 18,
- but we're not old enough to vote against the war you're killing us with until we're 21!
So Dickster the Trickster dropped the vote age from 21 to 18.
Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18.
You're referring to Amendment #26.
ARTICLE #26: Ratified July 1, 1971
SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United states, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United states or by any State on account of age.
That's fine.
BUT !!
You're overlooking Sect.2
And in the 3rd millennium, and considering the adversities our elections face from interference from both foreign and domestic sources, this proposal seems within the Constitutional powers congress is accorded by Sect.2.
We ALREADY have voter registration.
Why not at the time the voter registers, document the registration by administering a forgery resistant ID, with biometric double-check?
Our Constitution doesn't exclude ID. It merely enumerates that if the ID is implemented, the voter verify age 18.
sear
Mayor
Clarification:
"Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18." s
Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18 is the only permissible criterion, and that reasonable steps can't be taken to verify validity.
We do this for driving a car.
Would you have us believe driving a car is more in need of identification than voting? Driving is more important than voting?
"Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18." s
Not clear to me where your notion that the Constitution designates age 18 is the only permissible criterion, and that reasonable steps can't be taken to verify validity.
We do this for driving a car.
Would you have us believe driving a car is more in need of identification than voting? Driving is more important than voting?
I mean we have ID'S to buy cereal so surely we can do a voter ID right?
sear
Mayor
sd #13
I realize it's a fast-vanishing anachronism. But we still have $cash.
Our familiar forms of breakfast cereal, Cheerie O's, Wheaties, are high profit products for their makers.
There are more nutritious foods available at lower cost per pound.
But any of it can be bought anonymously for $cash, no ID required.
I realize it's a fast-vanishing anachronism. But we still have $cash.
Our familiar forms of breakfast cereal, Cheerie O's, Wheaties, are high profit products for their makers.
There are more nutritious foods available at lower cost per pound.
But any of it can be bought anonymously for $cash, no ID required.
I like this idea, I can vote 6 times, myself, wife, dad, 2 sons and nephew !
Emily
NSDAP Kanzler
The POTUS has no role in amending the constitution.
Otherwise, great post.
I suggest we amend it again to raise the age to 26.
ObamacareForever
Senator
I suggest we put a maximum age you can vote, and set it to 40.
Emily
NSDAP Kanzler
So that no one with any modicum of wisdom can vote?
Good plan -- guaranteed Democrat rule.
ObamacareForever
Senator
1.) Old people aren't wide. They just old.
2.) If they're wise enough to get drafted, they're wise enough to vote.
3.) Upping the minimum age is a transparent power grab by a bunch of people who about to die off anyways. Their ideas will die with them one or another.
