New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

So is "collusion" to commit election fraud a crime...

If you are for the Left you can say and do whatever you want.
 
Where is the evidence of fraud?
Correct - good point.

Lukey, please find some offshoot crime...say...”mortgage fraud” of some underling somewhere. This can then be cited as evidence of a larger crime committed by another person.

See...now THAT is “evidence”.
 
Last edited:
Or not?

New research reveals that Google built biases into its search results that influenced the 2018 midterm elections - possibly costing Republicans three congressional districts.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...ections-may-have-cost-republicans-seats-study

Tyler Durden again? Shheesh...

So tell me...how many of those searches were by anyone in the three districts who happened to be an undecided voter? How in hell would he know? The fact is that he doesn't.

You can count on ZeroHedge to dig up bullshit on demand.
 
Tyler Durden again? Shheesh...

So tell me...how many of those searches were by anyone in the three districts who happened to be an undecided voter? How in hell would he know? The fact is that he doesn't.

You can count on ZeroHedge to dig up bullshit on demand.

Stop calling Middleview “ZeroHedge”.
 
54518943_10156440041733983_4780117052180398080_n.jpg

guess who
 
Tyler Durden again? Shheesh...

So tell me...how many of those searches were by anyone in the three districts who happened to be an undecided voter? How in hell would he know? The fact is that he doesn't.

You can count on ZeroHedge to dig up bullshit on demand.

No, actually it was:

Dr. Robert Epstein - a San Diego-based Harvard Ph.D. who founded the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. He's also a Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), a UCSD visiting scholar, and served as editor-in-chief of Psychology Today.

He also supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 (just like Google!).

Of course if you'd read the link you'd have known that. But you aren't interested in facts (obviously). You'd rather propagandize (same shit different day) by suggesting the source is somehow not legitimate, because they hurt your feelings or some such bullshit.
 
Tyler Durden again? Shheesh...

So tell me...how many of those searches were by anyone in the three districts who happened to be an undecided voter? How in hell would he know? The fact is that he doesn't.

You can count on ZeroHedge to dig up bullshit on demand.

Wow, I'd love to hear your thoughts on how effective Russian interference was. Do you have any evidence of any voters changing their votes in 2016?
 
Correct - good point.

Lukey, please find some offshoot crime...say...”mortgage fraud” of some underling somewhere. This can then be cited as evidence of a larger crime committed by another person.

See...now THAT is “evidence”.

*middleview* says there can be no bank fraud if the bank didn't lose money.
 
No, actually it was:

Dr. Robert Epstein - a San Diego-based Harvard Ph.D. who founded the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. He's also a Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), a UCSD visiting scholar, and served as editor-in-chief of Psychology Today.

He also supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 (just like Google!).

Of course if you'd read the link you'd have known that. But you aren't interested in facts (obviously). You'd rather propagandize (same shit different day) by suggesting the source is somehow not legitimate, because they hurt your feelings or some such bullshit.
Try answering the points in my post.
 
No, actually it was:

Dr. Robert Epstein - a San Diego-based Harvard Ph.D. who founded the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. He's also a Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology (AIBRT), a UCSD visiting scholar, and served as editor-in-chief of Psychology Today.

He also supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 (just like Google!).

Of course if you'd read the link you'd have known that. But you aren't interested in facts (obviously). You'd rather propagandize (same shit different day) by suggesting the source is somehow not legitimate, because they hurt your feelings or some such bullshit.

Dr. Robert Epstein: ‘No Paper Trail’ for Google Search Manipulation


Manipulation of search suggestions by companies like Google leaves “no paper trail,” and is almost impossible to detect

In correspondence with Breitbart News, Epstein explained how a company like Google could do this while leaving “no paper trail for authorities to follow.” Indeed, his work on the 2016 election suggests that the tech giant may already have done so, to favor Hillary Clinton.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018...o-paper-trail-for-google-search-manipulation/

Pretty definitive, don't you think?

Were you aware of how unpopular Trump is in the Orange County districts where republicans lost? His district voted for Hillary in 2016. Rouda won by 21,000 votes. That district was one of 23 "split ticket" seats that the democrats had targeted. As far back as July of 2018 polls showed Rohrbacher losing 48% to 44%.

Trump's popularity was polling at 37% in Orange country.
http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/2018/04/trump-v-california-oc-battleground/
 
Back
Top