What's the denominator? Counties? How many voters are in each county? If 99% of 100 counties went for Donald, but each county only held 1 voter, that's 99 votes for Donald. If 1% of 100 counties went for Biden and that county had 200 voters, that's 200 votes for Biden. Biden wins. It's stupid to count counties without considering how many voters are in each.
But Biden got more votes in places with clouds with in the sky.
What's the denominator? Counties? How many voters are in each county? If 99% of 100 counties went for Donald, but each county only held 1 voter, that's 99 votes for Donald. If 1% of 100 counties went for Biden and that county had 200 voters, that's 200 votes for Biden. Biden wins. It's stupid to count counties without considering how many voters are in each.
BTW, 79% + 27% > 100%.

SO now the electoral college ought to go by county rather then by the state? Trump has gotten fewer votes in both of his elections. He got in in 2016 by the electoral college and this time he lost even that and now you say you can question the vote because he did not win the majority of counties, LOL.
I didn't say that.....remedial reading suggested.SO now the electoral college ought to go by county rather then by the state? Trump has gotten fewer votes in both of his elections. He got in in 2016 by the electoral college and this time he lost even that and now you say you can question the vote because he did not win the majority of counties, LOL.
His appeal isn't broader, he got less votes than both Biden in 20 and Clinton in 16.Too funny...what's the purpose of adding Trump's % to Obama's % ? Trying to make me look stupid backfired.
View attachment 59596
Yes it is but I didn't. I'm well aware that all 3142 counties don't have the same population. Implying I did is dumber than your apples and oranges 79 + 27 logic.
The data is Charlie Kirk's not mine. I only added the % knowing addled minds wouldn't be able to comprehend his point, which is Trump's appeal to voters is far broader than Joe's or Barack's yet he lost, which is why people question the election.
I understand all of it, the problem is a few urban areas are running the show now and if they succeed in getting rid of the Electoral College millions of people can forget ever voting again.
His appeal isn't broader, he got less votes than both Biden in 20 and Clinton in 16.
He does appeal more to rural people. Less so to urban and suburban people. Hence far more counties, far fewer votes.
My rural county voted Trump, for example, but we have less people in the entire county then You do in a few city blocks of an urban area.
Merry Christmas to you to.Yada, yada, yada.... you fail to understand what the chart makes clear, you twist it, are in full denial of it but Merry Christmas anyway.
Votes are votes, Trump didn't get enough where it counted.Yep - in fact Biden "won" because he got far more votes than Obama in just five or six cities, that just happen to be in swing states. If you think these urban voters turned out for Biden in bigger numbers that they did for Obama, you are either lying or you have shit for brains.
Of course Biden got more votes in urban areas than Obama did. The population is bigger and Trump was so awful that people were highly motivated to vote against him.Yep - in fact Biden "won" because he got far more votes than Obama in just five or six cities, that just happen to be in swing states. If you think these urban voters turned out for Biden in bigger numbers that they did for Obama, you are either lying or you have shit for brains.
Some folks who claim to be smart are not really all that. Deluded by the Kraken.These are basic facts and you accuse others of having shit for brains?
I think the salient point here is that Trump lost, Biden won. That remains true no matter what perspective it is viewed from.

