New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Some strange behavior

bdtex

Administrator
Staff member
Meanwhile, back on Earth, election officials and other investigators validated and that nothing nefarious occurred.
And the lawyers who perpetuated the Big Lie in the courts are in the process of being sanctioned and/or disbarred and having the pants sued off of them for defamation. Been reading any of Rudy's deposition transcripts? He got some of his "evidence" from social media and he said/she said stuff from GoW types.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Smells like a cover up to me. And now that so much time has elapsed they're likely to get away with it.
As Gabe Sterling stated, the ballot boxes were put under the table at about 9:30pm, while observers and reporters were still there. The election workers thought they were closing down for the night.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
There are posters here who express strange behavior. They demand proof of things on unreasonable terms. Lets say that the last election was stolen. They'll insist that recounts are forensic audits and you're just unreasonable to not accept that people with a vested interested to support the status quo would find nothing wrong with their work product. Your concerns are debunked. You'll illustrate how apparently the cheating was so bad that partisan witnesses were removed from premises where some were to watch polls and other to challenge polls. That counting was shutdown for the night and yet without witnesses the counting continued. We all saw those statements made by the very people making the claim. But that is all "debunked" according to some here. That reasoning of yours angers them. They jump around like roosters in a c*ck fight insisting on proof of a stolen election but object at any kind of investigation that would make a finding either way unless and until you have "proof". Its pathetic reasoning. Dishonest and unpatriotic reasoning.

Then you humor them and offer "proof." You mention the video of women pulling hidden ballot boxes from under tables and counting them after they've sent what witnesses there were to the process home for the night. But don't believe your lying eyes, that is debunked too. Mention that Dominion hardware has internet access despite the CEO in congressional testimony saying they don't and despite law saying they shouldn't. BUTT FSCK THAT'S DEBUNKED TOO. ha ha ha ha

Then they get upset because you call them the names they deserve to be called. Well, fsck them.
And again, all those bizarre, evidence-free claims were debunked months ago, usually by GOP officials.

Sane people pay your thoroughly debunked claims no credence. You should take our word on that and move on.
 
Nope. Who Cares that you saw the video and the timestamps. What does that even mean?

I know. It means absolutely zero other than you saw a video, and you saw some timestamps. Big deal. You seeing a video, and some time stamps in the video, doesn't somehow validate that a fraud was perpetrated.

Meanwhile, back on Earth, election officials and other investigators validated and that nothing nefarious occurred.
Cause I care don't forget your booster. Times coming up.
 
Yes, it would have taken the cooperation of millions of Republicans to perpetrate a conspiracy on the scale you posit.
No, just 4 election precincts run by and for Democrats.

All those ostensible voters who signed and returned their absentee ballots, all the observers in every precinct, and the list goes on.
Once you split the ballot from the envelope you don't have a leg to stand on.
 

JuliefromOhio

President
Supporting Member
Perhaps it’s that your factual claims don’t stand up to scrutiny and the malfeasance you claim to have thought you saw was either your deliberate dishonesty or your simple-minded misunderstanding of the process. Perhaps we don’t want people who oppose the status quo (constitutional government by consent of the governed) to be the only voices heard, when your only reason to dismiss the many Republicans who have investigated and determined that Biden won a free and fair election is that you dislike their conclusions on ideological grounds.
A++.
You should hold on to this reply and repost it every time one of the Big Lie trumpies post their nonsense.
Heck, post it in every thread. It's that good.
 

EatTheRich

President
No, just 4 election precincts run by and for Democrats.



Once you split the ballot from the envelope you don't have a leg to stand on.
1. Where Biden won by the votes of hundreds of thousands, under the same procedures verifiably employed in every other district in the same state.

2. So your position is that the only possible free election is one without a secret ballot?
 
1. Where Biden won by the votes of hundreds of thousands, under the same procedures verifiably employed in every other district in the same state.

2. So your position is that the only possible free election is one without a secret ballot?
1. No.
2. No.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. No.
2. No.
If the ballot remains with the envelope after being counted, how can it be a secret ballot?

Yes, Biden’ margin of victory in the closest swing state, Georgia, was more than 20 times Bush’s margin of victory in Florida (where the vote’s integrity was marred by much more serious irregularities, such as the Secretary of State who, the courts determined, illegally intervened to assist Bush also being Bush’s campaign chair and the governor who cooked up the illegal voter disfranchisement program being his brother, and where the shift of fewer than 300 votes would have changed the election outcome, which, however, was NOT violently contested by Gore supporters) in the 2000 election.
 
Top