New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

speculation

Boltlady

Boltlady

Governor
Much of what gets reported as news is speculation from whatever source so I'd like to speculate on something. It's actually a speculative question.

What would happen if through all the Trump trials coming up it would be shown that the 2020 election was rigged and he was voted the legitimate President? Those trials might allow evidence to appear that hasn't been allowed previously. Interesting thought.
 
Boltlady said:
Much of what gets reported as news is speculation from whatever source so I'd like to speculate on something. It's actually a speculative question.

What would happen if through all the Trump trials coming up it would be shown that the 2020 election was rigged and he was voted the legitimate President? Those trials might allow evidence to appear that hasn't been allowed previously. Interesting thought.
Click to expand...

Trump and his minions have now had three years to produce such evidence. They filed some 63 lawsuits throughout the land. They have never produced any evidence casting even a shred of doubt in any of the swing states in question. Yet here you are asking - what happens if they do it?

You might as well ask what happens if a monkey flies out of Trump’s ass. But you don’t ask that. You realize it’s a ridiculous question. But you do ask a similarly ridiculous question. The more interesting question is why you even pose such a ridiculous question. Do you know why?
 
Boltlady said:
Much of what gets reported as news is speculation from whatever source so I'd like to speculate on something. It's actually a speculative question.

What would happen if through all the Trump trials coming up it would be shown that the 2020 election was rigged and he was voted the legitimate President? Those trials might allow evidence to appear that hasn't been allowed previously. Interesting thought.
Click to expand...

Sure...... that's gonna happen. In your dreams.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
Trump and his minions have now had three years to produce such evidence. They filed some 63 lawsuits throughout the land. They have never produced any evidence casting even a shred of doubt in any of the swing states in question. Yet here you are asking - what happens if they do it?

You might as well ask what happens if a monkey flies out of Trump’s ass. But you don’t ask that. You realize it’s a ridiculous question. But you do ask a similarly ridiculous question. The more interesting question is why you even pose such a ridiculous question. Do you know why?
Click to expand...

Actually they have not been allowed to present a lot of their evidence in their various lawsuits. As long as that contention still exists it seems fair to speculate on what could happen if some of totals were changed.
 
Boltlady said:
Actually they have not been allowed to present a lot of their evidence in their various lawsuits. As long as that contention still exists it seems fair to speculate on what could happen if some of totals were changed.
Click to expand...

And what if, instead, Trump is found guilty in the Jan 6 trial? Should he be allowed to run for office? Read the 14th amendment.
 
middleview said:
And what if, instead, Trump is found guilty in the Jan 6 trial? Should he be allowed to run for office? Read the 14th amendment.
Click to expand...

The Republicans have a lot of evidence against guilt in this one so if he's found guilty an appeal should fix that. Those indictments and charges are so obviously desperate attempts to keep him from being able to open the bags and let the cats out that those of you who believe all that stuff are part of ever narrowing numbers.
 
Boltlady said:
The Republicans have a lot of evidence against guilt in this one so if he's found guilty an appeal should fix that. Those indictments and charges are so obviously desperate attempts to keep him from being able to open the bags and let the cats out that those of you who believe all that stuff are part of ever narrowing numbers.
Click to expand...

I'm not aware of any evidence that shows Trump is not guilty...please elaborate.

Here is the evidence that stands against him.
1. Communication between the Trump campaign and the various people organizing people to come to DC.
2. Money paid to the groups chartering buses and planes to transport Trump supporters.
3. Oath Keepers and Proud Boys in communication with Trump campaign officials.
4. Trump speech on Jan 6. Telling the mob that only they could stop the steal...they needed to go to the capitol and fight like hell.
5. Trump's tweet telling rioters that Pence had betrayed them.
6. Trump sitting in the dining room watching the riot for 3 hours without responding by sending help....in spite of pleas from his staff and family.

Your turn....
 
middleview said:
I'm not aware of any evidence that shows Trump is not guilty...please elaborate.

Here is the evidence that stands against him.
1. Communication between the Trump campaign and the various people organizing people to come to DC.
2. Money paid to the groups chartering buses and planes to transport Trump supporters.
3. Oath Keepers and Proud Boys in communication with Trump campaign officials.
4. Trump speech on Jan 6. Telling the mob that only they could stop the steal...they needed to go to the capitol and fight like hell.
5. Trump's tweet telling rioters that Pence had betrayed them.
6. Trump sitting in the dining room watching the riot for 3 hours without responding by sending help....in spite of pleas from his staff and family.

Your turn....
Click to expand...

If actual evidence was presented before a trial there would be no need for a trial.
 
Boltlady said:
Those trials might allow evidence to appear that hasn't been allowed previously. Interesting thought.
Click to expand...
What if they present it all and still lose? I sincerely hope that they come forward with all the evidence that hasn't already been presented and rejected. Put it out there. We want to see it.
 
middleview said:
What do you think is presented to get an indictment from a grand jury? Meanwhile...what evidence do you think proves Trump not guilty?
Click to expand...

I could be wrong but it's been my understanding that a grand jury can indict based on information from only one side.

The evidence that could prove Trump not guilty is that which has not been presented yet for lack of the trial being held yet.
 
Boltlady said:
I could be wrong but it's been my understanding that a grand jury can indict based on information from only one side.

The evidence that could prove Trump not guilty is that which has not been presented yet for lack of the trial being held yet.
Click to expand...
Correct...it is one sided...the actual trial is for both sides...so what evidence would show Trump innocent?
 
Boltlady said:
That's what the media tries to do.
Click to expand...

What power does the media have to find someone guilty and sentence them? None.

AGAIN...you claimed the republicans have evidence to show Trump is innocent. What is it? Your post...

The Republicans have a lot of evidence against guilt in this one so if he's found guilty an appeal should fix that
 
Boltlady said:
Actually they have not been allowed to present a lot of their evidence in their various lawsuits. As long as that contention still exists it seems fair to speculate on what could happen if some of totals were changed.
Click to expand...

That’s ridiculous, but not quite as ridiculous as ignoring the fact that they have had three years since those 63 lawsuits to produce such evidence, but have produced nada. Nil. Zero. Zilch. Bubkis.

When hundreds if not thousands of people have toiled away for three years trying to prove that something exists, all for naught, sane people can reach but one conclusion - it doesn’t exist. Join us, won’t you?
 
Last edited:
Boltlady said:
Actually they have not been allowed to present a lot of their evidence in their various lawsuits. As long as that contention still exists it seems fair to speculate on what could happen if some of totals were changed.
Click to expand...

The evidence that Trump thinks proves his case has been presented in the media. None of it has stood up to scrutiny. Do you think there is evidence that has not been part of any of Trump's rallies? Never part of a Trump interview? Not discussed on a Hannity or Tucker show?

So it seems the real evidence has been kept secret all these years, eh?
 
middleview said:
What power does the media have to find someone guilty and sentence them? None.

AGAIN...you claimed the republicans have evidence to show Trump is innocent. What is it? Your post...

The Republicans have a lot of evidence against guilt in this one so if he's found guilty an appeal should fix that
Click to expand...

14,000 videos
 
Boltlady said:
Much of what gets reported as news is speculation from whatever source so I'd like to speculate on something. It's actually a speculative question.

What would happen if through all the Trump trials coming up it would be shown that the 2020 election was rigged and he was voted the legitimate President? Those trials might allow evidence to appear that hasn't been allowed previously. Interesting thought.
Click to expand...

Frankly I don't think it would change anything. Democrats are in power, and they are more than willing to kill to keep it, as evidenced by the months they used the FDA to delay the rollout of the Covid vaccine until after the election. By the democrat's own rhetoric, that would have cost thousands of lives, and yet democrats were more than willing to sacrifice them in order to attain power.
 
Boltlady said:
14,000 videos
Click to expand...

Of what? Link to one proving anything that makes Trump less guilty of the DC riot, attempt to intimidate the Georgia Secretary of State to "find" votes, the conspiracy to appoint fake electors...

As a bonus...find a video that shows election fraud...and please, don't bother with the one of the ballot boxes being pulled out from under the table.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top