New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Syria

S

Sickofleft

Guest
While I understand the need to take out Syria's chemical weapons capability something I support. I would also like to say that I have absolutely no confidence in this Administration when it comes to anything what-so-ever.

Not a particularly religious person but......god help us all.
 
Sickofleft said:
While I understand the need to take out Syria's chemical weapons capability something I support. I would also like to say that I have absolutely no confidence in this Administration when it comes to anything what-so-ever.

Not a particularly religious person but......god help us all.
Click to expand...

...so are you saying that if there was a republican President, you would support military intervention in Syria?
 
As always won foreign policy, notice?


SOL won't offer ONE proactive solution to the problems he complains about. His ideology (neo-conservatism) is bankrupt or unpopular.
 
Figjam said:
...so are you saying that if there was a republican President, you would support military intervention in Syria?
Click to expand...

No. As I said in my post I understand the need to take out Syria's chemical weapons capability and support the President doing so. Absent Syria's recent use of chemical weapons I would not support any military intervention in Syria regardless of who was President.

However none of that changes the fact that I have no confidence in this Adminstration.
 
Sickofleft said:
No. As I said in my post I understand the need to take out Syria's chemical weapons capability and support the President doing so. Absent Syria's recent use of chemical weapons I would not support any military intervention in Syria regardless of who was President.

However none of that changes the fact that I have no confidence in this Adminstration.
Click to expand...

...OK - well, I do NOT support any intervention in the Syrian Civil War, whatsoever regardless...

...BTW - the drumbeat for intervention is coming from the right - many of whom will almost immediately disavow any responsibility if action is taken...
 
GordonGecko said:
As always won foreign policy, notice?


SOL won't offer ONE proactive solution to the problems he complains about. His ideology (neo-conservatism) is bankrupt or unpopular.
Click to expand...


Call neo-conservatism whatever you want Gordo, if it was bankrupt what does that make yours?.... Is there a word in the english language to describe how vacant this President is.............
 
Figjam said:
...
...BTW - the drumbeat for intervention is coming from the right - many of whom will almost immediately disavow any responsibility if action is taken...
Click to expand...

Well we have seen that before, after Iraq war went South several esteemed members of the Democratic party started crying and claiming that the resolution they voted for did not really say what it said..............talk about "disavow any responsibility if action is taken".......

A spine is not something the modern Dem requires apparently.
 
Sickofleft said:
While I understand the need to take out Syria's chemical weapons capability something I support. I would also like to say that I have absolutely no confidence in this Administration when it comes to anything what-so-ever.

Not a particularly religious person but......god help us all.
Click to expand...

I expect that we will do some weak little something that signifies nothing, accomplishes nothing and may, in fact, level an Aspirin factory and kill civilians. But Obama will make grandiose proclamations about it forevermore.

And yes.............God help us all.
 
Jen said:
I expect that we will do some weak little something that signifies nothing, accomplishes nothing and may, in fact, level an Aspirin factory and kill civilians. But Obama will make grandiose proclamations about it forevermore.

And yes.............God help us all.
Click to expand...

...you mean like this?

aupload.wikimedia.org_wikipedia_en_thumb_f_ff_Bush_mission_accd0d2969b7f7a03697e98b722e8d551bc.jpg
...when there were ~10-years of work remaining and little had really been accomplished? No, I am guessing that is not what you mean...
 
Sickofleft said:
Well we have seen that before, after Iraq war went South several esteemed members of the Democratic party started crying and claiming that the resolution they voted for did not really say what it said..............talk about "disavow any responsibility if action is taken".......

A spine is not something the modern Dem requires apparently.
Click to expand...

...and who was responsible for the unnecessary war that was still raging when they left office? Oh, right -
aupload.wikimedia.org_wikipedia_en_thumb_f_ff_Bush_mission_accd0d2969b7f7a03697e98b722e8d551bc.jpg
...
 
Figjam said:
...you mean like this?

View attachment 23291
...when there were ~10-years of work remaining and little had really been accomplished? No, I am guessing that is not what you mean...
Click to expand...

No she is talking about sending a few missiles to kill some mountian goats, like after our Embassies were blown up in Africa or doing absolutely nothing after the USS Cole. Or even prior to that having no response what so ever to the attack on Khobar Towers or to Saddam Hussein tossing out the UN in 98 without so much as a wimper.

We were a joke to an organization that had already declared war on us in 1996. No wonder they thought they could get away with 9/11.

but ya know....meh......what difference does it make......
 
SOL, looked at your TP, your post at 3:23pm, 3:28, 3:32, and four minutes ago.....

not ONE idea on what you'd SUPPORT doing in Syria....just complaints.

I'd say that's pretty much a bankrupt belief system. Because we old-timers remember how much of a rah-rah neo-conservative cheerleader you were on Iraq.

Now...you have no answers, because all you have are the OLD answers ...which aren't popular.
 
Sickofleft said:
Well we have seen that before, after Iraq war went South several esteemed members of the Democratic party started crying and claiming that the resolution they voted for did not really say what it said..............talk about "disavow any responsibility if action is taken"......A spine is not something the modern Dem requires apparently.
Click to expand...

What's really amazing about the Pigs re: Iraq was they voted down a resolution vis a vis Iraq but when the tide turned and polls changed they themselves brought it up for another vote and jumped on board only to criticize Bush years later when the tide changed again.

Despicable people...
 
Last edited:
GordonGecko said:
SOL, looked at your TP, your post at 3:23pm, 3:28, 3:32, and four minutes ago.....

not ONE idea on what you'd SUPPORT doing in Syria....just complaints.

I'd say that's pretty much a bankrupt belief system. Because we old-timers remember how much of a rah-rah neo-conservative cheerleader you were on Iraq.

Now...you have no answers, because all you have are the OLD answers ...which aren't popular.
Click to expand...

I think its pretty clear what I support doing in Syria Gordo maybe you should learn to read.

Gordo here apparently thinks our entire foreign policy should based on what is popular and only on what is "popular". However he will never admit that under the current incarnation of the "Obama Doctrine" we would not even tried to stop the Nazi's because....ya know...the Europeans have been killing each other for centuries.....sooooooooooooooo please........

STFU.....it is you that are bankrupt you partisan hack.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sickofleft said:
So you want to bomb Canada for something LBJ did in 65?........
Click to expand...

Be careful with using the word "bomb"!

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has suffered some Obama creep.

It's now very domestic and includes Christians, Veterans, Bible thumpers, Gun Clingers, and Tea Party types.

Working together the NSA and IRS can track you down.

"Bum" would be a better code word. The regime appreciates and cultivates bums. Actually, they depend on them for their own survival.
 
Sickofleft said:
The war was over and won when he left office.
Click to expand...
Nope. Nobody outside the Fox News echo chamber believes that nonsense. In 2008, 314 Americans died in Iraq, plus many hundreds of Iraqi defense force troops, plus around 5000 confirmed Iraqi civilian KIAs.

If losing 314 Americans in Iraq, in Bush's last year, amounts to the war being over and won, then Obama can claim the war in Afghanistan was over and won in 2012, when we had fewer than 314 American KIAs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top