New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Teacher in hot water for teaching 3rd graders Constitutional Rights

I'm not sure Harry Potter belongs in a public school curriculum either. Or Game of Thrones. Or Lord of the Rings.

That said, i don't understand why the pledge of allegiance and constitution would be a problem. Except that constitutional principles and the ideals of the founding fathers are probably beyond kids who read at the 3rd grade level and don't read newspapers yet.
 
I'm not sure Harry Potter belongs in a public school curriculum either. Or Game of Thrones. Or Lord of the Rings.

That said, i don't understand why the pledge of allegiance and constitution would be a problem. Except that constitutional principles and the ideals of the founding fathers are probably beyond kids who read at the 3rd grade level and don't read newspapers yet.
Having worked in the school system for 13 years, I think teaching 3rd graders about the founding fathers, and the constitution is a good idea.
 
I'm not sure Harry Potter belongs in a public school curriculum either. Or Game of Thrones. Or Lord of the Rings.

That said, i don't understand why the pledge of allegiance and constitution would be a problem. Except that constitutional principles and the ideals of the founding fathers are probably beyond kids who read at the 3rd grade level and don't read newspapers yet.

Well, this is proof they don't want kids to be taught it and I don't know many adults that read newspapers any longer
 
Appears you have it assbackwards
Here's and interesting read from a democrat
Why this Democrat believes a Republican state can be a model for the country (msn.com)
No, I don’t. She taught them that the pledge mandate was part of Cold War nationalist propaganda similar to the sort that solidified the Hitler movement and they had the right not to say the pledge and not to talk to police (besides identifying themselves), and the administration sacrificed her to appease the right-wingers who objected.
 
No, I don’t. She taught them that the pledge mandate was part of Cold War nationalist propaganda similar to the sort that solidified the Hitler movement and they had the right not to say the pledge and not to talk to police (besides identifying themselves), and the administration sacrificed her to appease the right-wingers who objected.

So the leftist Austin administration did it for the right-wingers
dammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
 
Austin, Texas
Thanks to rampant leftism, Austin, Texas, heads for Mad Max territory - American Thinker

As smart as you seem to be it's laughable when you plat dumb and ask such stupid questions, why even go there?
And? What do you think the teacher meant when she said (closely paraphrased) “you would expect this kind of thing to happen in West Texas, not here in Austin”?

SHE is the Austin left-winger, hence the commitment to civil rights which got her in trouble.
 
Back
Top