New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Terrorist?

SW48 said:
Was paris a terrorist attack? What was their motivation?

Terror is their motivation. They are attacking the US to try to draw them into the war in the middle east. Looks like ISIS may have embedded a terrorist in this case through the marriage.
Click to expand...
Given the apparent lack of any personal connection between the attackers and their victims in Paris, and how widespread and coordinated it was, it's easy to infer an intent that meets the definition of terrorism. With the more recent attack, that's not as easy.
 
Arkady said:
Given the apparent lack of any personal connection between the attackers and their victims in Paris, and how widespread and coordinated it was, it's easy to infer an intent that meets the definition of terrorism. With the more recent attack, that's not as easy.
Click to expand...

Θ can't call it what it is

12274203_788887221221094_4662980540360118875_n.jpg
 
Arkady said:
I'll gladly admit that the latest attack was probably conservative religious terrorism. I'm just not going to assert it was until there's firmer evidence of motive.
Click to expand...

that gawd damn Muslim had nothing to do with conservatives and everything to do with Islamic Terrorism.............you libs deserve it for defending them
 
Zam-Zam said:
New information:

Investigators think that as the San Bernardino, California, massacre was happening, female shooter Tashfeen Malik posted a pledge of allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook, three U.S. officials familiar with the investigation told CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/04/us/san-bernardino-shooting/index.html

Make of that what you will.
Click to expand...

This just in from MSNBC! "ISIS" is likely an acronym for the Tea Party. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is the code name for Wayne LaPierre.
 
Arkady said:
Given the apparent lack of any personal connection between the attackers and their victims in Paris, and how widespread and coordinated it was, it's easy to infer an intent that meets the definition of terrorism. With the more recent attack, that's not as easy.
Click to expand...

I didn't realize the attackers in Paris were coordinated with ISIS vs this attack in CA which you are saying was not coordinated by ISIS.
 
Dawg said:
that gawd damn Muslim had nothing to do with conservatives and everything to do with Islamic Terrorism.............you libs deserve it for defending them
Click to expand...
Islamic terrorism is just an extreme form of religious conservatism. Try to keep up.
 
SW48 said:
I didn't realize the attackers in Paris were coordinated with ISIS vs this attack in CA which you are saying was not coordinated by ISIS.
Click to expand...
You misunderstood. Try rereading. If you're still having trouble, let me know and I'll walk you through it. Start with the fact I never mentioned ISIS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top