New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The big lie

middleview

President
Supporting Member
It's been 4 years of Abrams crying ELECTION WAS STOLEN and the PJ leftist cry of only Trump saying the same thingless than 2 years which proves their hypocrisy and fake screams
Did she try to overturn the election by calling a mob to show up for a wild rally and riot in Atlanta? Trump just had a rally and is still saying the election was stolen. The only place I hear of any claim by Abrams is when you bring it up.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Did she try to overturn the election by calling a mob to show up for a wild rally and riot in Atlanta? Trump just had a rally and is still saying the election was stolen. The only place I hear of any claim by Abrams is when you bring it up.
In Trumplandia they seem to be obsessing over pro-voting rights Abrams backers losing one election case, as they ignore the fact that Trump lost over 60 election cases.

P.S. The case did result in some wins for the pro-voting rights plaintiffs. Said the judge:

“This is a voting rights case that resulted in wins and losses for all parties over the course of the litigation and culminated in what is believed to have been the longest voting rights bench trial in the history of the Northern District of Georgia,” Jones wrote.”


Also from the link:

“Jones noted that while the plaintiffs called witnesses who testified about struggles to cast their ballots because of the practices at issue, most were able to vote in the end.”

Most? That’s good enough these days?

Simply awful.
 
Last edited:
Pushed by Biden and Democrats as Jim Crow 2.0. Major League baseball moved their baseball game out of Atlanta over it. Large corporations banned/ moved business in Georgia. Now the truth comes out. From an Obama appointed judge no less.



Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
They are incapable of shame, integrity, common sense or telling the truth. Those are all things that stand in the way of someone trying to gain as much power as possible.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Did she try to overturn the election by calling a mob to show up for a wild rally and riot in Atlanta? Trump just had a rally and is still saying the election was stolen. The only place I hear of any claim by Abrams is when you bring it up.
You claim to know all, did she? Lil' fella it's all over the net of Judge sank her battleship, try to for once be current on events.

An organization linked to Stacey Abrams lost a lawsuit to increase voter turnout after a judge found no evidence Georgia's voting systems are racially discriminatory (msn.com)
 
Last edited:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
They are incapable of shame, integrity, common sense or telling the truth. Those are all things that stand in the way of someone trying to gain as much power as possible.
Gaining or keeping power wasn't the goal of Trump's riot? Clearly you do not show evidence of integrity in your own claims about the 2020 election.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member

Bugsy McGurk

President
Gaining or keeping power wasn't the goal of Trump's riot? Clearly you do not show evidence of integrity in your own claims about the 2020 election.
In Trumplandia, it was wrong for the Abrams group to partially lose one pro-voting rights case, and it was fine for Trump to lose over 60 anti-democratic lawsuits, followed by his incitement of a violent seizure of the Capitol to stop the counting of electoral votes.

It’s just how Trump cultist roll.
 
Gaining or keeping power wasn't the goal of Trump's riot? Clearly you do not show evidence of integrity in your own claims about the 2020 election.
There was no rhyme or reason to what happened on 1/6 what you and Liz (she lost right?), and all the other Soviets claim is complete and utter bullshit. The election was never in any danger of "being overtuned that day"... none the less we know how disappointed you are that you could not have shot them all twice. 1/6 has been exgerated beyond measure so your betters can carry out a political persecution.

What is not bullshit, spying on Trumps campaign in 2016 and later his Presidency, lying to get FISA warrants, re-writing Michael Flynn's FBI report, manufacting electronic data to make the POTUS look like he was tied to a bank in Russia, claiming Hunters Laptop was Russian Disinformation, FBI suppressing any investigation into it and leaning on social media companies to do the same,

Shall I go on?
 
In Trumplandia, it was wrong for the Abrams group to partially lose one pro-voting rights case, and it was fine for Trump to lose over 60 anti-democratic lawsuits, followed by his incitement of a violent seizure of the Capitol to stop the counting of electoral votes.

It’s just how Trump cultist roll.
You should go back to the childrens table, the Shirley Temple they made for you is getting warm.
 

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
Your post is “supported” by a tweet and an article behind a paywall. Surely you read about the case and can link to something informative, no?
The implication you are making here is that the OP is capable of doing that. That sounds like quite a stretch all things considered.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
There was no rhyme or reason to what happened on 1/6 what you and Liz (she lost right?), and all the other Soviets claim is complete and utter bullshit. The election was never in any danger of "being overtuned that day"... none the less we know how disappointed you are that you could not have shot them all twice. 1/6 has been exgerated beyond measure so your betters can carry out a political persecution.

What is not bullshit, spying on Trumps campaign in 2016 and later his Presidency, lying to get FISA warrants, re-writing Michael Flynn's FBI report, manufacting electronic data to make the POTUS look like he was tied to a bank in Russia, claiming Hunters Laptop was Russian Disinformation, FBI suppressing any investigation into it and leaning on social media companies to do the same,

Shall I go on?
Repeating the same lies over and over again will not make them more convincing.
Trump first tried to overturn millions of votes by court cases that sought to throw out votes in the battleground states. He failed.

John Eastman wrote a plan up to overturn the election by challenging the count of electors.

READ: Trump lawyer’s memo on six-step plan for Pence to overturn the election
READ: Trump lawyer's memo on six-step plan for Pence to overturn the election | CNN Politics

When Pence repeatedly told Trump that he did not have the authority, under the constitution, to challenge electors Trump called for a wild demonstration on January 6th.

Why the 6th? If the idea was to persuade members of congress to question those elections in the battleground states, wouldn't it have made more sense to have called for a protest in December? The only reason for the 6th was because that was the day of the count. The very last day that the count could be interrupted or changed.

The riot was exactly what Trump wanted. Trump wanted the republican legislatures to illegally have appointed a replacement set of electors and probably hoped the mob would kill or capture Pence or members of congress...

That is why he sat watching on TV for three f*cking hours and did not send reinforcements. No other excuse. When it was obvious that all of congress and Pence had been evacuated and were beyond the reach of the mob...he finally told them to go home...

I've answered your other crap. Nobody spied on the Trump campaign or White House. The info the lawyer took to the FBI about the Russian bank was thrown out as irrelevant and was based on publicly available DNS data and was a goofy interpretation of that data that was ignored by the FBI.
 

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
Agreed. That’s why I googled up the link I provide above.

;-)
The implication you are making here is that the OP is capable reading and understanding that legitimate article. That sounds like quite a stretch all things considered.

;-)
 

JohnJohnson

Council Member
Your post is “supported” by a tweet and an article behind a paywall.
Obama appointed judge Steve C. Jones:

"Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status.”

Is he speaking the truth or are you helping to push the big lie?
 

JohnJohnson

Council Member
The implication you are making here is that the OP is capable reading and understanding that legitimate article. That sounds like quite a stretch all things considered.

;-)
So you still refuse to reject the big lie pushed by Stacey Abrams and Biden's DOJ in this case?

Obama appointed judge: "Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status.”


You agree or not?
 
Top