New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The first openly gay army secretary thread.

Samuel Sam

Council Member
Have you heard that Obama nominated firs openly gay guy to be the army secretary?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry..._55fc6b34e4b00310edf6feec?utm_hp_ref=politics
I always thought that gay people fit more to different creative professions. They are the best in designing, performing and party making. But the DoD intends the strong will and personality for the individual.
Now I pray to God not to let our enemies attack the USA until Obama and Fanning are at their service.
The rainbow army will obviously fail.
Eric_Fanning_insert_public_domain.jpg
 
Have you heard that Obama nominated firs openly gay guy to be the army secretary?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry..._55fc6b34e4b00310edf6feec?utm_hp_ref=politics
I always thought that gay people fit more to different creative professions. They are the best in designing, performing and party making. But the DoD intends the strong will and personality for the individual.
Now I pray to God not to let our enemies attack the USA until Obama and Fanning are at their service.
The rainbow army will obviously fail.
Eric_Fanning_insert_public_domain.jpg
Yes,we have heard.
 
Can he do the job? Maybe. I don't know much about him. As long as he is there to make the Army a cost efficient, well trained and equipped fighting force, I wish him the best. But if he's been appointed specifically to promote the LGBT agenda and make the Army part of the Obama global warming anti-capitalist wealth redistributionist agenda, then it is a travesty.
 
Can he do the job? Maybe. I don't know much about him. As long as he is there to make the Army a cost efficient, well trained and equipped fighting force, I wish him the best. But if he's been appointed specifically to promote the LGBT agenda and make the Army part of the Obama global warming anti-capitalist wealth redistributionist agenda, then it is a travesty.
Agreed for everything except the Global Warming part. I'd rephrase as "Obama global warming panicky 'we're all gonna die!' agenda"
 
It's pretty bad when a once reputable government agency resorts to fraud to advance a false agenda.

http://www.redstate.com/2015/09/20/...rature-data-underway-global-warming-cultists/
NASA isn't passing along fraud.

The problem with the global warming debate is that it's been politicized well beyond the bounds of science. Al Gore started it with his panicky "An Inconvenient Truth" lecture tour after he lost the 2000 election. The movie made from his tour, while interesting, furthered the problem of politicizing a scientific issue. Hollywood capitalizes on the pissing-one's-pants politicization with some movies. Notably "The Day After Tomorrow" which added to the exaggeration of the idea "We're all gonna die if we don't do something!!!"

Now we have too highly opposed political groups trying to push around a political football and neither of them is willing to view the actual science of the problem without prejudice.
 
Back
Top