The ISIS (Islamic State) Psyops Theater

[LanceFreeman]

Unlimited War! ISIS Psyop Theater Comes to Full Fruition
By Bernie Suarez
Global Research, February 16, 2015

The CIA and the U.S. Military Industrial Complex have now invested over 6 months of ISIS branding, promotion, and public relations. It was revealed by early January of 2015 that the U.S. had already dumped over one billion dollars to fight ISIS. All supposedly invested in failed air strikes and un-televised secret battles against ISIS where the U.S. ends up attacking Syrian targets instead.

The ISIS psyop has been worked on so hard by the architects of the plan that now we are seeing the final desired political goals of the entire operation – an operation which has become more of a global theater. The ISIS psyop theater is now coming to fruition and the globalists are speaking loud and clear about what they want, which is really an admission to why they concocted the ISIS psyop to begin with.

"Unlimited military force” wherever they want, whenever they want and (of course) on WHO-EVER they want to use it on. Isn’t this a tyrannical empire’s dream come true? And with this revelation the romance between ISIS and CIA/US/Israel and the other NATO ISIS partners is now fully exposed to anyone willing to see it for what it is.

For over 6 months Americans and people all over the world who still retain their normal critical thinking skills have been subjected to painfully sloppy fake ISIS videos, heavily scripted news reports verbally dictating to us accounts of supposed battles against ISIS. All along, as the months go by, ISIS has not been affected at all by anything the U.S. and its pro-ISIS allies have done. If anything, they keep telling us that ISIS continues to grow.

Even when it was revealed that throughout Iraq, “suspicions” were running deep back in September of 2014 that “CIA and Islamic State are united“, no one within the mainstream media did anything to stop the ISIS psyop by at least exposing the fact that not one ISIS supply line had been disrupted, not one bank account ceased, not one (illegal) NSA data mining effort able to collect the whereabouts of ISIS (as they do of U.S. innocent citizens) to gather them up and end the ISIS theater. Not one story was reported by mainstream media about the 100+ ISIS supply trucks rumbling through Turkey to get into Syria. Not one story appeared about how Turkey was supporting ISIS or about how the U.S. and its NATO allies were allowing ISIS to enjoy (food, water, toiletries and ammo) supplies without disruption.

We never did find out how ISIS was able to get on the Internet, make calls, communicate, make high production style videos and upload to the Internet. All we got was ISIS production departmentRita Katz and her (CIA approved anti-terror propaganda) SITE Institute telling us she luckily found the ISIS beheading videos and was able to show it to the world before ISIS themselves could promote their own video. Aside from this bizarre story we got not a peep from the mainstream media about anything relevant to stopping ISIS.

Since the launching of the ISIS show, mainstream media has instead been focused on only branding and promoting ISIS and showing the world how incredible and unstoppable they are. Since the branding of the ISIS name began late in the summer of 2014 we’ve watched the ISIS psyop script morph from the fake James Foley beheading video blocked from the masses by YouTube claiming the video was too graphic and offensive, to an organization which is now (supposedly) full-scale global force stronger and more organized than any nation on earth.

We have also watched for over 6 months now as the 82 Comments story evolved into a tale told very differently by two opposing forms of media coverage. The true alternative independent (non-corporate) media has collectively exposed the ISIS tale showing how each story gets more and more ridiculous. On the other hand, the mainstream corporate media has pounded the ISIS brand and its greatness into its viewers daily, carefully setting them up for the war approval request we see now.

If you actually tracked mainstream media stories of the last 6 months you will very likely find that ISIS has gotten more headlines than any other single topic. In an Orwellian society that suffers from headline news amnesia, thanks to the “ministry of truth” mainstream media who regularly changes the headline news to fit the agenda of the day, we’ve seen an unusual repetition of ISIS stories that doesn’t even fit the mainstream media’s own script, much less the framework of reality, truth and reason.

This over-the-top effort by CIA’s mainstream media to over-sell the ISIS brand is now primed for being fully exposed with the latest White House bold request for unlimited military power to strike and kill anyone they please. For perspective, let’s examine the Obama/White House psyop sequence of responses with respect to ISIS over the last six months.
[Continued---] [Continued---]

 

[LanceFreeman]

Timeline Of White House Reaction to ISIS

In early September 2014 on the heels of the fake beheading videos and stories of ISIS conquering Mosul and taking over U.S. weapons, Obama stated regarding ISIS, “we don’t have a strategy” – an unusual thing for any leader to say about any supposed threat. The strategy at the time was to make the U.S. FEEL like they were the underdogs. This “underdog” strategy is practiced by boxing coaches and we see this underdog strategy in sports all the time. It is well known that most people enjoy and prefer to root for the (perceived) underdog. Taking full advantage of this human tendency to root for the underdog was a significant piece of the early strategy for recruiting American sentiment and support for “action” against ISIS.

At the time, the mainstream media played right along with what clearly turned out to be the chosen strategy heading into the end of 2014 and early 2015. The plan? Blow up ISIS by talking endlessly about them and continue to show the world how they are growing, while continuing to sound weak with respect to attacking ISIS.

Following the September 2014 launching of the “we are the underdog” strategy, we heard highly unusual stories like ISIS bragging on social media about their success, ISIS making promotional videos involving the murder of non-supporters, ISIS somehow recruiting members all the way on the other side of the world, even ISIS printing their own money. By the end of 2014 there was almost nothing that ISIS had not accomplished.

By the turn of the new year (2015) the ISIS branding was secure and by January the U.S. Government announced the creation of a secret new “Task Force” to deal with ISIS. Details of this task force would be held a secret. The only thing we knew for sure was that it would require a lot of money $$$ to operate, that it would combine the efforts of the other NATO (pro-ISIS) countries, and that its location would be somewhere in the Middle East or South East Asia, smack in the middle of the region of the world where the U.S. has been illegally meddling in for years in its quest to run the world.

By early February 2015 the reaction from Obama and the White House was “Obama Warns Against Exaggerating the Islamic State Threat“. This position and this reaction to ISIS was intended as nothing more than reverse psychology. Obama, who had been positioning himself as the underdog all this time, now begins to position himself as someone not so eager to attack ISIS, someone who is calm and not wanting to sound like a warmonger. This was all by design.

Shortly after this staged comment attempting to sound calm and cool, of course Obama is now reacting to the ISIS soap opera in an exaggerated manner. Any time a staged terror group gets its ammunition, support, supplies and public relations from the same country they claim they will be attacking, responding to this staged situation with unlimited power of war is very much an exaggeration.

Just days after announcing his request for unlimited war on the Middle East, all consistent with the PNAC plans, now it is being reported that 4000 U.S. troops are heading to Kuwait to fight ISIS. This is what happens when the CIA’s mainstream media and its bought-out politicians make the decisions that please the U.S. Military Industrial Complex. The rest of us sit here watching these psychopaths lie about ISIS and give themselves power to wage limitless war.

Breaking the ISIS Hypnotic Spell

Let’s do everything we can to expose this pro-war psychological operation whose main goal we are now seeing come to fruition. The globalist gangsters want to wage unlimited war, and it’s up to us to stop them. We also need to stop thinking of ISIS and the New World Order gangsters as being separate entities, they are not. The Islamic state is very much a big part of the new world order plans. Now more than ever it is important to dump the mainstream corporate media and hope that enough truth comes out of independent media to trigger enough doubt in Americans to stop this latest war authorization trick from the White House. At this point in history Americans are burned out with the same script: Problem-Reaction-Solution. We know that the “solutions” offered by government are no solutions at all; rather, it is always an extension of the problem. We are being fooled every time into Problem-Reaction-More Problem!

Bernie Suarez is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

 

[marvin martian]

See how none of the PJ lefties dispute your posts?

It's because they agree with you...100%.

You do the work of the progreSSive left and their jihadist allies.

 

[MrMike]

The dedication of the e-jihadi's like Lanced, Dolt, Ali, and Queenie to pimping the Jihadist causes never ceases. Wonder when shift change happens?

See how none of the PJ lefties dispute your posts?

It's because they agree with you...100%.

You do the work of the progreSSive left and their jihadist allies.

 

[marvin martian]

Wonder when shift change happens?

Usually when one or the other of them gets kicked out of whatever internet cafe in Islamabad or Riyadh they are currently occupying...

 

[bdtex]

See how none of the PJ lefties dispute your posts?

It's because they agree with you...100%.

You do the work of the progreSSive left and their jihadist allies.

Do you read 'em? I don't. If any one of us wants to read 'em,we know where to find them. Copy-n-pasting 'em here doesn't make 'em any better.

 

[MrMike]

So now Obama's "bosses in London" are calling the shots?

Do you even realize how nutty you and your e-jihadi pals sound?

Folks, I told you some time ago that, regarding ISIS, Obama will make his move when the timing was right, and that he will sit back and make excuses for his inaction until that time has come. That usually means: when his bosses in London give him the signal. And that usually means: when the American people are properly primed, and are hopping mad that America is not doing anything to stop ISIS.

Now, Obama is on the move, asking Congress for something far beyond what he needs to fight ISIS. He is looking to give the U.S. military full spectrum dominance in the Middle East. That could mean anything. It stinks of long-term deployment, which is clearly not in the interest of the United States. It could mean going beyond ISIS into toppling the Assad regime in Damascus. It could mean engaging Iran, and bombing it back to the Stone Age, if it does not do exactly what Israel wants. It could mean challenging Russia in Iran and in Ukraine. It could mean World War 3. Are you prepared for all that? My guess is--you are not. You never are--you always wind up with your teat caught in a meat-grinder. Because you don't think; because you don't analyze; because you allow the Lucifer worshipers (the Zionists) to constantly lead you by the nose.

 

[middleview]

See how none of the PJ lefties dispute your posts?

It's because they agree with you...100%.

You do the work of the progreSSive left and their jihadist allies.

Curious assumption. More likely most people are bored shitless with AIL or Lanceloonie or the Queen. It is people like Sgt Stumbles and JackoffDallas who are rooting for ISIL to kill some Americans who you should be talking to about their views of Lance's crap.

 

[MrMike]

To be honest I've seen you try with Lanced, Ail and the others many times. It's just an exercise in futility as they stick to their script without pause. I wonder if they get overtime pay? lol

Curious assumption. More likely most people are bored shitless with AIL or Lanceloonie or the Queen. It is people like Sgt Stumbles and JackoffDallas who are rooting for ISIL to kill some Americans who you should be talking to about their views of Lance's crap.

 

[Caroljo]

Curious assumption. More likely most people are bored shitless with AIL or Lanceloonie or the Queen. It is people like Sgt Stumbles and JackoffDallas who are rooting for ISIL to kill some Americans who you should be talking to about their views of Lance's crap.

I'm getting really tired of all you libs stating that we're rooting for American deaths!! You know damn well that isn't true. Because we expect something to happen doesn't mean we WISH it to happen. But you know that.

 

[middleview]

I'm getting really tired of all you libs stating that we're rooting for American deaths!! You know damn well that isn't true. Because we expect something to happen doesn't mean we WISH it to happen. But you know that.

Sgt Stumbles has stated that anything that bad happens on Obama's watch will be good for America....because he thinks the end justifies the means....he roots for the republican party first. JackoffDallas hates Obama with an irrational passion that eliminates reason....

I'm getting really tired of all you republicans arguing that your hatred of the president is based on logic.

 

[Caroljo]

Sgt Stumbles has stated that anything that bad happens on Obama's watch will be good for America....because he thinks the end justifies the means....he roots for the republican party first. JackoffDallas hates Obama with an irrational passion that eliminates reason....

I'm getting really tired of all you republicans arguing that your hatred of the president is based on logic.

Of course you won't believe it, but I'm not a Republican and I've said it over and over here.

And no, I don't believe the hatred is based just on logic....it's also based on what he's done (or hasn't done). He's a loser and will be known as the worst President in history.

 

[middleview]

Of course you won't believe it, but I'm not a Republican and I've said it over and over here.

And no, I don't believe the hatred is based just on logic....it's also based on what he's done (or hasn't done). He's a loser and will be known as the worst President in history.

Your hatred is based on RNC talking points, RNC accusations of scandal (all now proven false), RNC anti-Obama rumor campaigns...and you think you aren't a republican? You might not be registered....but you're certainly voting republican.

You completely disregard that Bush was clearly the worst president since Hoover. I base that on two bungled wars, 4,500 dead American soldiers, 3,000 dead American citizens, more than a dozen attacks on embassies and about 60 dead, an economy that was the worst since 1929 and the 7 year long failure to bring the murderer of 3,000 Americans to justice.

 

[Caroljo]

Your hatred is based on RNC talking points, RNC accusations of scandal (all now proven false), RNC anti-Obama rumor campaigns...and you think you aren't a republican? You might not be registered....but you're certainly voting republican.

You completely disregard that Bush was clearly the worst president since Hoover. I base that on two bungled wars, 4,500 dead American soldiers, 3,000 dead American citizens, more than a dozen attacks on embassies and about 60 dead, an economy that was the worst since 1929 and the 7 year long failure to bring the murderer of 3,000 Americans to justice.

You have every right to your opinion....and that's all it is. Bush made mistakes, but he was also backed by the people he needed to back him. INCLUDING many of the Democrats that also believed as he did....until they decided not to. When I hear guys in the military state that they wished Bush was back in Office and Obama needs to go....that tells me he wasn't all that bad. At least he showed them respect & still does. Obama never has.

 

[middleview]

You have every right to your opinion....and that's all it is. Bush made mistakes, but he was also backed by the people he needed to back him. INCLUDING many of the Democrats that also believed as he did....until they decided not to. When I hear guys in the military state that they wished Bush was back in Office and Obama needs to go....that tells me he wasn't all that bad. At least he showed them respect & still does. Obama never has.

1. Bush made mistakes...that is the only accurate statement you've made here.
2. Some democrats voted for things he supported...so what? Did they vote to disband the Iraqi army? No. Did they vote to dismantle the Iraqi government? No. Did they vote on Cheney's secret meetings with oil company CEOs? No. Did they vote to use "Stop Loss" on soldiers who were due for discharge and were instead kept in Iraq or Afghanistan after their discharge dates? No...and that happened to 88,000 soldiers. Did the democrats vote to send old and obsolete body armor into combat for reserve troops? No.
Was the use of Stop Loss showing respect to the troops? Do the guys you talk to remember when Bush cut their pay....no more combat pay for guys serving in Iraq...the war is over...that was the logic in 2004.

Bush sought to roll-back increases in imminent danger pay and family separation allowances. The Administration wanted to cut imminent danger pay from $225 to $150 a month and the family separation allowance, which goes to help military families pay rent, child care or other expenses while soldiers are away, from $250 from $100 a month.

They did back down from that attempt...but they tried.

Was it showing respect for his senior officers on the ground when he denied them reinforcements?

Was it showing respect for the military when he decided to disband the Iraqi army, sending about 250,000 armed Iraqi soldiers into the streets with their weapons and no chance of a job?

The bottom line is that you may have talked to a dozen guys who share your views on Obama. Statistically it is meaningless.

 

[LanceFreeman]

Do you read 'em? I don't. If any one of us wants to read 'em,we know where to find them. Copy-n-pasting 'em here doesn't make 'em any better.

Thank you for your contribution to free speech, free discourse, and respect for opinion, bdtex. You're a moderator; you're supposed to be neutral in those debates, not to openly take sides, or to blatantly attempt to cripple another poster whose views you do not agree with. Or, am I wrong in assessing you thus?

 

[bdtex]

Thank you for your contribution to free speech, free discourse, and respect for opinion, bdtex. You're a moderator; you're supposed to be neutral in those debates, not to openly take sides, or to blatantly attempt to cripple another poster whose views you do not agree with. Or, am I wrong in assessing you thus?

Neutral in matters of moderation,not in discussions in the open forums as a member.

 

[LanceFreeman]

The following represent my views and comments on the article:


Since it reared its ugly head many months ago, ISIS/ISIL has been deliberately baiting the US, daring it to come back to the Mid-East in force to take it on. It is deliberately massacring Muslim and Christian civilians to sweeten the pot for America; to make it more likely that the US and its NATO partners will take the bait. How does that square with its official intent to create an Islamic State? You have to be a complete naif (as Americans generally are) to believe the Islamic State bull. This is a trap, designed to draw America back to the Mid-East quagmire, plain and simple. This 'come on' is being bolstered by a concerted campaign of terror attacks to inflame anti-Muslim feeling in America and Europe, and to increase the likelihood of Americans supporting such a re-engagement of troops.

IMO, the ISIS/Islamic State Psyops Theater is designed to play a triple role on the world stage:
(1) Firstly, to set the whole Mid-East region aflame in war, with the U.S. and NATO being major participants in the subjugation and destruction of that region; (2) to arouse negative feelings and attitudes toward Muslims in Europe and America; and (3) to entice European Jews to emigrate to Israel by setting them up as targets of terror attacks.

Bibi Netanyahu's antics are a part and parcel of a well-planned Zionist campaign to bring Jewish settlers to Palestine to occupy lands confiscated from Palestinians, and from other Gentile populations that Israel plans to displace in the future. Israel has long had its eyes set on southern Lebanon, for example, and on some portions of Syria. This new war that Obama is preparing for us will, at some point, grant Israel further land-grabbing opportunities, perhaps by providing a window for an attack on Hezbollah in south Lebanon, and then finding an excuse to remain there indefinitely.

There is indeed method to this ISIS madness, but Americans are so visually impaired, so blinded by propaganda, and so under-educated about the geo-politics of the Middle East, they cannot see beyond the TV sound bytes hurled at them daily by the Orwellian (government-controlled) media. Consequently, every decision they make in support of their government's action in that part of the world is the wrong one. Until Americans begin to mine the Alternative Media for suppressed information, to think independently for themselves, and to seriously question the motives of their leadership, they will forever remain at the mercy of the master manipulators in Washington.

Folks, I told you some time ago that, regarding ISIS, Obama will make his move when the timing was right, and that he will sit back and make excuses for his inaction until that time has come. That usually means: when his bosses in London give him the signal. And that usually means: when the American people are properly primed, and are hopping mad that America is not doing anything to stop ISIS.

Now, Obama is on the move, asking Congress for something far beyond what he needs to fight ISIS. He is looking to give the U.S. military full spectrum dominance in the Middle East. That could mean anything. It stinks of long-term deployment, which is clearly not in the interest of the United States. It could mean going beyond ISIS into toppling the Assad regime in Damascus. It could mean engaging Iran, and bombing it back to the Stone Age, if it does not do exactly what Israel wants. It could mean challenging Russia in Iran and in Ukraine. It could mean World War 3. Are you prepared for all that? My guess is--you are not. You never are--you always wind up with your teat caught in a meat-grinder, and much poorer for your efforts.

 

[LanceFreeman]

Neutral in matters of moderation,not in discussions in the open forums as a member.

Does that include you deliberately trying to cripple another poster with derogatory remarks, or trying to discourage other posters from participating on his thread?

What bothers me the most about your action is that you know next to nothing about the geo-politics of the Mid-East region, or the veracity of the subject matter I presented for viewing, but saw fit to interject and interfere with the conversation posters were having about it---and then you yank it off that particular forum without warning, or reason, or any inkling of where you transferred it. That, to me, sir, is neither professional nor the mark of a good moderator.

Btw, as someone who has spent over 30 years traveling and living in the Mid-East region, I can tell you that this article by Bernie Suarez is excellent, and very much on the mark. It needs to be read by every citizen who wants to know the truth of what's happening out there, before his government drags him, and his money, into another fruitless quagmire.

 

[LanceFreeman]

The Israeli false-flag operation called ISIS has been so successful in destabilizing and antagonizing nations across the Fertile Crescent, the Arabs and North Africans themselves are sending their own troops and bombers to destroy their neighbors' lands (and futures), turning these once fertile lands into wastelands, and making it virtually impossible for these target nations to make a come-back. And now, Americans, never ones to pass up a turkey shoot, want in on the action before the fun is over.

The Israelis must be tickled pink. All they have to do now is sit tight and wait for the dust to settle, then cherry pick what slices of territory they want to annex/add to their Eretz Israel dream empire.

It is no accident that every country the U.S. and its tar baby, Israel, have touched with their slimy fingers has turned into a failed state, mired in war, misery, and refugees by the thousands (and millions). Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Ukraine, and counting---

Lebanon is barely hanging on, threatened on one side by Israel (and its counter-foil, Hezbollah, which would not exist but for Israel) and millions of refugees on the other, who are straining its meager resources. A failed state in the making.

When all is chaos across Planet Earth, the New World Order people will then propose solutions, and the exhausted nations will be grateful for what peace they will get.

Order out of Chaos.