New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The latest Zimmerman update.....

Oh that's HILARIOUS!

While one day the loser will get himself into a horrible situation that results in death or prison, it's ironic some anti-Zimmerman wacko is doing the time he no doubt wishes Zimmerman were doing.

Certain posters here should take notice. I think we all know who we're talking about.
 
The Thinker said:
Oh that's HILARIOUS!

While one day the loser will get himself into a horrible situation that results in death or prison, it's ironic some anti-Zimmerman wacko is doing the time he no doubt wishes Zimmerman were doing.

Certain posters here should take notice. I think we all know who we're talking about.
Click to expand...

I don't really remember much about the incident. But, either they put their A-team on this or the guy really was a nut job.
 
people typically serve 1/3 of their sentence. don't ask me whatever happened to "truth in sentencing".

I didn't follow a single day of this trial, so I am completely ignorant of the evidence. however, any public defender should have made one or more of the following arguments:

  1. The shooter was intoxicated and was simply trying to intimidate Zimmerman, not assassinate him.
  2. The shooter has a (relatively) clean record up til that point
  3. The media inflamed tensions over Zimmerman, leading to 1,000 threats against him a day, at one point.
  4. The shooter is willing to "forever" surrender his right to own a gun, and enter a substance abuse program, and undertake 2,000 hours of community service in order to spare the state the financial burden of incarcerating him for decades.
 
as seen on tv said:
people typically serve 1/3 of their sentence. don't ask me whatever happened to "truth in sentencing".

I didn't follow a single day of this trial, so I am completely ignorant of the evidence. however, any public defender should have made one or more of the following arguments:

  1. The shooter was intoxicated and was simply trying to intimidate Zimmerman, not assassinate him.
  2. The shooter has a (relatively) clean record up til that point
  3. The media inflamed tensions over Zimmerman, leading to 1,000 threats against him a day, at one point.
  4. The shooter is willing to "forever" surrender his right to own a gun, and enter a substance abuse program, and undertake 2,000 hours of community service in order to spare the state the financial burden of incarcerating him for decades.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I didn't follow any of it either. But, it certainly seems like someone dropped the ball here....

connie
 
as seen on tv said:
people typically serve 1/3 of their sentence. don't ask me whatever happened to "truth in sentencing".

I didn't follow a single day of this trial, so I am completely ignorant of the evidence. however, any public defender should have made one or more of the following arguments:

  1. The shooter was intoxicated and was simply trying to intimidate Zimmerman, not assassinate him.
  2. The shooter has a (relatively) clean record up til that point
  3. The media inflamed tensions over Zimmerman, leading to 1,000 threats against him a day, at one point.
  4. The shooter is willing to "forever" surrender his right to own a gun, and enter a substance abuse program, and undertake 2,000 hours of community service in order to spare the state the financial burden of incarcerating him for decades.
Click to expand...

How about the Zimmerman defense ? No matter who was at fault for the situation starting and / or for it becoming a a violent confrontation. The shooter was in fear for his life at the moment he pulled the trigger. Just like Zimmerman says he was in fear for his life at the moment when he shot and killed Martin.
 
Spamature said:
How about the Zimmerman defense ? No matter who was at fault for the situation starting and / or for it becoming a a violent confrontation. The shooter was in fear for his life at the moment he pulled the trigger. Just like Zimmerman says he was in fear for his life at the moment when he shot and killed Martin.
Click to expand...

shooting into a car isn't self defense..........now if he'd got Zimmie on sidewalk he might could have used that defense...........
 
there is an authority on Zimmie case, can't believe they are silent ☻
 
Spamature said:
How about the Zimmerman defense ? No matter who was at fault for the situation starting and / or for it becoming a a violent confrontation. The shooter was in fear for his life at the moment he pulled the trigger. Just like Zimmerman says he was in fear for his life at the moment when he shot and killed Martin.
Click to expand...

Poor Nina, flailing away as usual. So sad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top