The missing message..

[Woolleybugger]

In the debate about the mandate no one seems to advocate for the poor oppressed minority that is now uninsured. Forty to fifty million people do not have insurance right now. Where is their leader saying that they refuse to pay for insurance until they need it? Who speaks for the millions that rely upon free emergency care to save their lives in the pursuit of liberty? I know that most of the most strident opponents of Obamacare are concerned mostly with those without insurance. But are they truly representing them or are they representing themselves? There is a huge lack of national advocacy for those that will be forced to pay something to cover them in the event they need care. Why are these oppressed millions not forming a coalition to protest the government asking them to pay for a service they may get for free?

Fox News should explain this for us.

 

[Lukey]

Health care "freeloaders" is the big smokescreen in the Obamacare debate so maybe that's why you aren't getting any responses here. With the Democrat's core constituency of "freeloaders" no one seriously considers your unserious call to "end the freeloading." And we well know the key principle in this legislation is righteous indignation over some of us having good access to preventive care while the poor and the working poor are unable to walk into any Doctor's office they choose and receive any kind of care they think they may need (and hand the bill to the nearest rich guy). So, in fact, what it seeks to do is ratchet up the "freeloader" coefficient in the health care marketplace, not reduce it. So have fun trying to get some dumb right winger to bite on this...

 

[NightSwimmer]

Every "freeloader" that I've encountered here in my neck of the woods is a staunch Republican. They may be voting against their own self interests, but (like many here on PJ), they do it with gusto. Getting that Kenyan out of the White House is priority one for them.