New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The Neo-Confederates are coming!

Bo-4

Senator
Nothing is too crazy for the Teabagging right these days. Hell, this clown is going to primary Thad Cochran who's apparently wasn't crazy enough for Mississippi anymore because he didn't want to go on The Carnival Cruz. AND, Chris McDaniel just got an endorsement from Freedumb Works! :(

http://www.motherjones.com/politics...idate-spoke-neo-confederate-conference-august

1004545_766231310070611_1883742425_n.jpg
 
264496_634507929934305_345004955_n.jpg
no wonder 'O' refused to go to Gettysburg☻[/quote]

You never fail. It's really quite amazing.



It's Not Lincoln, But It's Still Memorable

July 29, 1995|By Ann Landers.


Dear Ann Landers:

I'll bet you've printed this piece before, but it's worth repeating. It was written by Abraham Lincoln.

Joyce in Bandera, Texas

Dear Joyce: I did indeed print "Ten Cannots" in 1991 and was inundated with letters telling me Abraham Lincoln was NOT the author.

The first letter was from historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. Then came letters from L.S. Clemens, then editor of the Elgin Courier-News, and Mike Lackey, of the Lima, Ohio,News. All informed me that the author was the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian clergyman who had given up the pulpit to lecture on industrial relations. He wrote those words in 1916. However, a pamphlet that included these "Ten Cannots" by the Rev. Boetcker, also included an authentic quote from Abraham Lincoln.

That's where the confusion set in. It was placed in the Congressional Record in 1949, attributed to Abraham Lincoln, and has been reprinted repeatedly since then. If one takes a closer look, it doesn't appear to be something Lincoln would have said, but it does contain wisdom. Here it is again:

Ten Cannots by the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.

You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.

You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.

You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.

You cannot establish security on borrowed money.

You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence.

You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
 
264496_634507929934305_345004955_n.jpg
no wonder 'O' refused to go to Gettysburg☻

You never fail. It's really quite amazing.



It's Not Lincoln, But It's Still Memorable

July 29, 1995|By Ann Landers.


Dear Ann Landers:

I'll bet you've printed this piece before, but it's worth repeating. It was written by Abraham Lincoln.

Joyce in Bandera, Texas

Dear Joyce: I did indeed print "Ten Cannots" in 1991 and was inundated with letters telling me Abraham Lincoln was NOT the author.

The first letter was from historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. Then came letters from L.S. Clemens, then editor of the Elgin Courier-News, and Mike Lackey, of the Lima, Ohio,News. All informed me that the author was the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian clergyman who had given up the pulpit to lecture on industrial relations. He wrote those words in 1916. However, a pamphlet that included these "Ten Cannots" by the Rev. Boetcker, also included an authentic quote from Abraham Lincoln.

That's where the confusion set in. It was placed in the Congressional Record in 1949, attributed to Abraham Lincoln, and has been reprinted repeatedly since then. If one takes a closer look, it doesn't appear to be something Lincoln would have said, but it does contain wisdom. Here it is again:

Ten Cannots by the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.

You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.

You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.

You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.

You cannot establish security on borrowed money.

You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence.

You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.[/quote]
Attaboy lefty. Ignore the meaning of the post and attack the poster. Now tell us, what do you think about the fact that idontnobama isn't going to Gettysburg?
 
So lets get this straight..Neo Confederate:

Neo......meaning new

Confederate......pertaining to the Confederate States of America...err Democrats who wanted to keep slavery...see Stephen A Douglas(D-IL)

Douglas campaigned energetically, attacking abolitionism in the North, and disunionism in the South.

So I think the premise of new Democrats in the south prmoting the usual segergation and slavery ideals is not far fetched....but BO4 has s it all wrong...He is just pissed that slavery was abolished in Mississippi by Republicans...he preffered the days when the Democratic governor could walk into a court room and shake the hand of the man that killed Medgar Evers.
 
You never fail. It's really quite amazing.



It's Not Lincoln, But It's Still Memorable

July 29, 1995|By Ann Landers.


Dear Ann Landers:

I'll bet you've printed this piece before, but it's worth repeating. It was written by Abraham Lincoln.

Joyce in Bandera, Texas

Dear Joyce: I did indeed print "Ten Cannots" in 1991 and was inundated with letters telling me Abraham Lincoln was NOT the author.

The first letter was from historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. Then came letters from L.S. Clemens, then editor of the Elgin Courier-News, and Mike Lackey, of the Lima, Ohio,News. All informed me that the author was the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian clergyman who had given up the pulpit to lecture on industrial relations. He wrote those words in 1916. However, a pamphlet that included these "Ten Cannots" by the Rev. Boetcker, also included an authentic quote from Abraham Lincoln.

That's where the confusion set in. It was placed in the Congressional Record in 1949, attributed to Abraham Lincoln, and has been reprinted repeatedly since then. If one takes a closer look, it doesn't appear to be something Lincoln would have said, but it does contain wisdom. Here it is again:

Ten Cannots by the Rev. William J.H. Boetcker

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.

You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.

You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.

You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.

You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.

You cannot establish security on borrowed money.

You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence.

You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
Attaboy lefty. Ignore the meaning of the post and attack the poster. Now tell us, what do you think about the fact that idontnobama isn't going to Gettysburg?[/quote]

Oh...how original.

I don't think anything about Obama not going to Gettysburg. I have no expectation the President appear at every anniversary of everything.

But yes...when quotes are misrepresented for false purpose, I feel perfectly fine commenting upon it.
 
Well, this thread was dissapointing. PJcon has literally no direct response other than YOU GO TEA-BOY and WAVE THAT CONFEDERATE FLAG!!

Meh...
 
Attaboy lefty. Ignore the meaning of the post and attack the poster. Now tell us, what do you think about the fact that idontnobama isn't going to Gettysburg?

Oh...how original.

I don't think anything about Obama not going to Gettysburg. I have no expectation the President appear at every anniversary of everything.

But yes...when quotes are misrepresented for false purpose, I feel perfectly fine commenting upon it.[/quote]

must be having another hood party at the white house that day............ever who said the above spoke the truth.................☻
 
Go for it ... sooner the better.

Real Americans no longer need Mississippi or Texas.

that's not only states considering leaving progressives to themselves..........:) that would be a wonder to watch, they think the food is raised in the back of the store and can't clean a buck or run a trout-line.........they'd starve to death in less than 60 days√
 
that's not only states considering leaving progressives to themselves..........:) that would be a wonder to watch, they think the food is raised in the back of the store and can't clean a buck or run a trout-line.........they'd starve to death in less than 60 days√


Most of these so-called neo- confederates are just stupid old white men living in some trailer parks...They are a pathetic joke
 
that's not only states considering leaving progressives to themselves..........:) that would be a wonder to watch, they think the food is raised in the back of the store and can't clean a buck or run a trout-line.........they'd starve to death in less than 60 days√

We'd starve without Mississippi & Texas? Meh.. California and Florida have delicious citrus. We have fine seafood from OR, WA and the Northeast. Potatoes from ID, and veggies from anywhere including our own gardens. Guessin' we might miss their okra (iffin' we ever got it ;-)

And NOBODY would miss having to subsidize NASCAR fans. :D
 
We'd starve without Mississippi & Texas? Meh.. California and Florida have delicious citrus. We have fine seafood from OR, WA and the Northeast. Potatoes from ID, and veggies from anywhere including our own gardens. Guessin' we might miss their okra (iffin' we ever got it ;-)

And NOBODY would miss having to subsidize NASCAR fans. :D

well if the South goes, so goes Florida and those delicious citrus.......pacfic seafood glows in the dark and tater soup gets old after awhile.......season isn't long enough for gardens and some those western Red states, well, they might go as well. NASCAR fans don't need no subsidizing...........hell...when last time ya bought tickets........speaking of subs.......

http://otherwords.org/wont-love-mcsubsidies/

where ya reckon most them mickey D's are bought______☻
 
The PJ conservatives (who never vote Republican, BTW) are apparently pleased with their progress. I wish them well. I hope that the Tea Party candidates win every primary, regardless of which Party banner they choose to run under.
 
Back
Top