well gramps, I'd have to ask -- how do you solve a problem with a discernable and continuing cause, without first accurately determing what that cause is?
For example, people died from something quite mysterious and beyond the grasp of most for most of our recorded history before pathogens of the bacterial kind were discovered. The proximate cause for AGW has been as well.
It does no good to simply agree we're heating up while some are blind and in disagreement as to the cause. In the case of AGW, we're talking about the blindest of all -- those who will not see no matter how buried they are in the evidence for the cause. I have no patience or tolerance for that kind regardless of their political ideology, because if they are that blind or simply ignorant, they have no business thinking their unifomed ignorance and opinions have any place in the debate about the causes/s.
They are just in the way of the adults and their conversations, like the whiny, snot-nosed brat often is. All noise and no substance.
