New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

This is a serious question

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Again, you're showing your dishonesty.

I never said anything about it being "just the women". That was a lie on your part. Like I would expect any less from you.

However, Unfortunately, reality is not a big fan of social justice. And the reality is that women are the ones who carry the child. Again, we all know this, and yet women make these decisions pretending that there is no consequence.

Of course men are just as responsible and should be just as responsible. There are several forms of male contraception. Men tend to care less, however, because nature and society has allowed them to cut and run, leaving the woman to bare the consequences alone.
He like to do that. Tell you what you did or didn't say rather than read what you said.

That's his schtick..that's how he wins...by arguing with himself
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
He seems to have forgotten that it was the Clinton administration that pushed for the subsidies on the use of Viagra. Frankly, I have no issue with it if, again, used responsibly.

@write on seems to feel that it has anything to do with the issue of abortion. It doesn't. It's an entirely separate issue. If the people in question used condoms or got the shot, or used oral birth control or the morning after pill or other methods of contraception then sex shouldn't be an issue.
Maybe you will get lucky as I am and he will put you in Ignore

or You will him
 

write on

Senator
That is a lie.

Nobody is just blaming women for becoming pregnant. And state family law statutes provide for forced support of mothers with children, even out of wedlock. Child support isn't just for married people. (Edited)
You just said that not 5 mins earlier.

The right wing does blame any young girl for getting pregnant, And it is you talking out of both sides of your mouth when you first called them sluts not long beforehand.

Men are not subsidized by government for Viagra. It is a prescription drug available on the free market, (obviously from the High demand coming from the left.) Tell us again how an erectile dysfunction drug somehow magically causes a woman to become pregnant out of wedlock.
You'll throw shit at the wall just to see what'll stick. I beg to differ. It is a prescription but don't now try to hide that you love government when it funds your needs or interests.


And the Roe thing isn't being argued according to any religious innuendo. It was based on faulty science. And it will not be completely overturned. (Edited)
Is this life?

 

EatTheRich

President
No one is forcing a woman to have a child. That would imply that we are forcing them to have sex. Sex is a choice, and with the many forms of birth control, getting pregnant is also a choice. These are consensual acts, no one is forcing a woman to get pregnant. Once they are pregnant, however, then you're involving a second life.
Literally millions of women are forced to have sex every year. Like abortion laws, that’s one more way the patriarchy terrorizes women.
 

EatTheRich

President
First of all, (edited), let's look at the facts. Edited


1. Overturning Roe will not end abortion. Roe was bad law that was not based on science, but rather a lot of emotional bullshitt from a bunch of Feminists. Had there been a national right to abortion, passed by Congress and signed into law by a President, that would have been legitimate. Roe was an overreach of court power which has cost almost a trillion innocent babies their lives.

2. Individual states will decide if this person
View attachment 67344
has the same right to life as this person.
View attachment 67343
Your idiot blue state will probably uphold abortion on demand, which means most of your dumber left wingers will not be reproducing. Today is hell, but the actions will save the next generation, so it's not all bad news.

3. Most of America is not in favor of outlawing all abortion. Most of America agrees with the exceptions: rape, incest, a threat to the mother's life. Even the most radical blue states (passing post birth abortion) will have to send that one past the voters, and it'll take a lot of voter fraud to get a state legislature that far left.

4. Nobody in the pro life debate is coming at this from a religious angle. Frankly, that's just plain ignorant. The Bible is not the arbiter here. The Fifth Amendment here is. A person cannot be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process. And frankly, a High school slut wanting to look good in a prom dress does not qualify as due process.
The only person involved is a woman who is being deprived of her liberty, her right to privacy, and her right to equal protection if you have your way.
 

Boca

Governor
I am more honest than you'll ever be.

You don't just wake up with child. There is a process, and each part of that process is consensual and controllable. I know how you want to make every irresponsible person in the world a "victim" of people who feel you should be a grown, responsible person. But they aren't victims. They went every step of the way with their eyes open and now you're whining because there is a consequence to their actions? Like they didn't know that it was a distinct possibility? And they did it anyway.

Don't get me wrong, I am not anti-abortion by any means. However, if you're going to do adult things then there are adult consequences. And I am not so simple minded as to believe that a developing human being is no different than a cancer cell. You're killing an unborn human being, and there are people who that does not sit well with.
Don't waste your time.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Literally millions of women are forced to have sex every year. Like abortion laws, that’s one more way the patriarchy terrorizes women.
"millions of women are forced to have sex every year".......FORCED being the key word..........Prove that______GO

Since you posted you are "Gay" this should be very interesting to hear!
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
The only person involved is a woman who is being deprived of her liberty, her right to privacy, and her right to equal protection if you have your way.
"The only person involved" is a LIE
She didn't and couldn't get pregnant by herself.

Biden gives woman a reason now to not want to Abort.....$500 monthly for each baby and women with 6 or more babies hit the Lottery per-say
 

Dino

Russian Asset
It may sound comedic but, with the scotus about to rule on Roe v Wade, I think it's relevant.

If forcing a woman to have a child according to your god's will, then shouldn't Viagra be banned because impotence was his will also?
This is a serious question: are you a Quaker?
 

EatTheRich

President
"millions of women are forced to have sex every year".......FORCED being the key word..........Prove that______GO

Since you posted you are "Gay" this should be very interesting to hear!
 

EatTheRich

President
"The only person involved" is a LIE
She didn't and couldn't get pregnant by herself.

Biden gives woman a reason now to not want to Abort.....$500 monthly for each baby and women with 6 or more babies hit the Lottery per-say
Multiply that by 18 and that’s $9000 … or less than 1% of the $1 million cost of raising a child.

Causing an unwanted pregnancy does not give a man a right to force his partner to carry it to term.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Multiply that by 18 and that’s $9000 … or less than 1% of the $1 million cost of raising a child.

Causing an unwanted pregnancy does not give a man a right to force his partner to carry it to term.
$9000 monthly and add all the welfare and you get the Lottery

I've raised 3 kids and no way in hell did it cost me $1m@

You're acting in "bad faith" throwing that amount out
 

Colorforms

Senator
I don't care who subsidized it. That's not my point and you know it.

@write on seems to feel that it has anything to do with the issue of abortion. It doesn't

Yes, it does. If a man had a uterus, he wouldn't have the same opinion he does now.
Again, another BS argument. Women have a uterus and they still make the decisions they do now.

It's not a matter of sex, it's a matter of responsibility and being responsible. You coddle people so that they don't have to be, and it costs the lives of millions.
 

write on

Senator
Again, another BS argument. Women have a uterus and they still make the decisions they do now.

It's not a matter of sex, it's a matter of responsibility and being responsible. You coddle people so that they don't have to be, and it costs the lives of millions.
Whose responsibility? Those people that I coddle--aka... women?
 
Top