New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

This is not good for Sessions.

Good lord.

Q. Did anyone meet?

A. No.

English can be difficult...but it can also be blunt and easy to understand. Sessions...lied...under oath.

He omitted information which was irrelevant to the questions asked. The information which you Clinton-ite warmongers are demanding was a lie by omission, it was not a lie by omission - the answer given was relevant to the questions asked. That he will now expand on that answer, which should possibly have been better phrased in the dangerous and volatile political climate of America today, is not a denial that his answer was an honest one.

I know your beef is over Trump's clamp down on your fav 'blow' and I am sorry about that but that you are now pushing for a total breakdown of any chance of peace with Russia and so the ME and the world and even toward a civil war for your 'puff' is utter utter madness. And it is you warmongers who are the liars - it is you who can't give up your addiction to war - it is terrifying, absolutely terrifying - that you are pushing so hard to ward WWIII - you have all lot your minds.
 
He omitted information which was irrelevant to the questions asked. The information which you Clinton-ite warmongers are demanding was a lie by omission, it was not a lie by omission - the answer given was relevant to the questions asked. That he will now expand on that answer, which should possibly have been better phrased in the dangerous and volatile political climate of America today, is not a denial that his answer was an honest one.

I know your beef is over Trump's clamp down on your fav 'blow' and I am sorry about that but that you are now pushing for a total breakdown of any chance of peace with Russia and so the ME and the world and even toward a civil war for your 'puff' is utter utter madness. And it is you warmongers who are the liars - it is you who can't give up your addiction to war - it is terrifying, absolutely terrifying - that you are pushing so hard to ward WWIII - you have all lot your minds.

Hysterical. You first tell me he omitted information...which was that they MET...and then you try to sell folks that it wasn't a lie of omission.

My "beef" is with Sessions and his outright obvious lie...as he tried to get the job of TOP COP. This is perjury.
 
Thanks for proving they met....which was what Franken asked.

No, he asked if Sessions was aware of anyone associated with the campaign having communications with the Russians. He could have been clearer in his answer, but if he didn't meet with Kislyak on behalf of the campaign, or to discuss Russian "interference" in the campaign, then I wouldn't call his answer a "lie." He was the chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee. If that guy can't talk to diplomats, then we've got bigger problems than supposed Russian "interference" in the election.
 
Not if you are counting this one - which wasn't a "meeting."

Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador, is among a small group of diplomats who
chat with Mr. Sessions after an event during the Republican National Convention.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/02/us/politics/sessions-russia-timeline.html?_r=0

The September 8 meeting in his office was. So you got him on that one. Maybe he'll release the transcripts and we'll see if he discussed the hacks or any other campaign interference. If so, he should resign. I suspect he was referring to that sort of "communications with the Russians" in his hearing, because that is what Franken was asking about.


CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

https://www.bustle.com/p/transcript...xactly-what-he-said-at-his-confirmation-41938

He should have been more explicit, worded his answer better - that is all.

I find this all terrifying, don't you? What do they want? hat do they expect the outcome to be?

Lew Rockwell: It is the deep state. American mainstream media has been showing since the Church hearings and many other investigations, might as well juts be a part of the CIA. So this is just the more of the campaign against Trump, against having a friendly relationship with Russia. It is all the baloney about Russia having intervened in the American elections. By the way, the way the US intervenes in every single Russian election and elections all around the world, I don’t think the Russians intervened in the American elections. Certainly Sessions talking to the Russian ambassador at a Heritage Foundation party – there is nothing sinister about it. No ambassador is ever that country’s top spy. I mean in some sense every diplomat is a spy. This is just a hysterical nonsense that is being peddled.''


https://www.rt.com/op-edge/379355-sessions-russia-ambassador-us-msm/
 
No, he asked if Sessions was aware of anyone associated with the campaign having communications with the Russians. He could have been clearer in his answer, but if he didn't meet with Kislyak on behalf of the campaign, or to discuss Russian "interference" in the campaign, then I wouldn't call his answer a "lie." He was the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. If that guy can't talk to diplomats, then we've got bigger problems than supposed Russian "interference" in the election.
Yes...and clearly...folks associated with the Trump campaign MET with the Russians. There was no mention at all regarding "on behalf of the campaign".

You proved that some did...MEET.

Yes...he could have been clearer...by telling the truth.
 
I think they met, twice. His answer was false...which is why he will be amending it on Monday. In addition, I believe he knew others from the campaign met with the Russians.

In connection with the Trump campaign - not his actual job of work - were the questions asked - though no not even that - he was asked what he would do if he found that there had been fraternizing on behalf of the Trump campaign.
 
Yes...and clearly...folks associated with the Trump campaign MET with the Russians. There was no mention at all regarding "on behalf of the campaign".

You proved that some did...MEET.

Yes...he could have been clearer...by telling the truth.

In connection with the Trump campaign - as opposed to ordinary everyday normal relations with Russia -

''CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’
Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?''

https://www.bustle.com/p/transcript...xactly-what-he-said-at-his-confirmation-41938
 
Why oh why oh why do you so desperately want war with Russia? Why do you so hate Washington's dream for the US of being friends with the world and instead embrace, to such an extent that it is verging on treason, Clinton/Obama's dream of war with the world?

This is a serious question - do not deny your wish for hatred misery and war, you can't it shows in your every post - just please try to explain why you want it so badly that you are willing to risk your own country for it.
Nobody wants war with Russia, but nobody here in the US wants to be Putin's lapdog.
The alternative the Trump administration is not war with Russia.
 
In connection with the Trump campaign - not his actual job of work - were the questions asked - though no not even that - he was asked what he would do if he found that there had been fraternizing on behalf of the Trump campaign.

No. No. No.

There was no mention of meeting in connection with the campaign. The full exchange dealt with the damaging documents the Russians may have regarding Trump.


Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...t-what-jeff-sessions-told-al-franken-about-m/

So...he was not "aware" that he and others met...MET...with the Russians. Well then...such incredible lack of awareness is another good reason Sessions is a poor choice to head up the agency that can bring down Trump, as he shown an easy willingness to lie for him.

Why are you such a fan of corruption?
 
Nobody wants war with Russia, but nobody here in the US wants to be Putin's lapdog.
The alternative the Trump administration is not war with Russia.

Yes you do ------- stop it just stop lying - this is what it is about - War with Russia - you are addicted to war and so are pushing pushing pushing for your ultimate 'Clinton high'!

Or if it is not WWIII that you are after - you are totally bond or total fools - which is it? Because WWIII is the goal of your Obama/Clinton seditionists - for the whole world will go up in flames - they are mad and you all seem to have caught this madness - blinked fools is the best one could say about your craziness.
 
Yes...and clearly...folks associated with the Trump campaign MET with the Russians. There was no mention at all regarding "on behalf of the campaign".

You proved that some did...MEET.

Yes...he could have been clearer...by telling the truth.

Haven't you been a stickler in the past for keeping these matters in context?

CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

https://www.bustle.com/p/transcript...xactly-what-he-said-at-his-confirmation-41938

In the context of "a continuing exchange of information" I would say presumably regarding the election campaign, wouldn't you?
 
Haven't you been a stickler in the past for keeping these matters in context?

CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Sessions: I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

https://www.bustle.com/p/transcript...xactly-what-he-said-at-his-confirmation-41938

In the context of "a continuing exchange of information" I would say presumably regarding the election campaign, wouldn't you?

Did they meet in the course of the campaign?

The answer is...Yes. That is not the answer Sessions supplied.
 
No. No. No.

There was no mention of meeting in connection with the campaign. The full exchange dealt with the damaging documents the Russians may have regarding Trump.


Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...t-what-jeff-sessions-told-al-franken-about-m/

So...he was not "aware" that he and others met...MET...with the Russians. Well then...such incredible lack of awareness is another good reason Sessions is a poor choice to head up the agency that can bring down Trump, as he shown an easy willingness to lie for him.

Why are you such a fan of corruption?

What bull shit! What a twisting of the truth =

The Truth being the 1st casualty of the war you all so desperately want! Have your Clinton and Obama not spilt enough blood for ya? Obviously not - you want it right up and personal - and so you will and are doing all that you can, by any devious method possible, to destroy any chance of a peace - what the hell sort of people are you really? I used to think you had kindness in your hearts but you do not - a dreadful hatefulness has overcome you all = so consumed with hatred you will bring down the whole of civilization out of spite.
 
Yes you do ------- stop it just stop lying - this is what it is about - War with Russia - you are addicted to war and so are pushing pushing pushing for your ultimate 'Clinton high'!

Or if it is not WWIII that you are after - you are totally bond or total fools - which is it? Because WWIII is the goal of your Obama/Clinton seditionists - for the whole world will go up in flames - they are mad and you all seem to have caught this madness - blinked fools is the best one could say about your craziness.
1. Putin is using military agressively in the Ukraine, and Trump wants to appease him.
2.Trump's appeasement policy would work about as well as Neville Chamberlain's.
3. Luckily they invented economic sanctions since WW2, and they seem to working against Putin, but they need time to work, just like they worked in Iran, eventually Putin will get back in line.
4. Haven't we learned that making friends with brutal dictators will come back to bite us in the @$$?
 
What bull shit! What a twisting of the truth =

The Truth being the 1st casualty of the war you all so desperately want! Have your Clinton and Obama not spilt enough blood for ya? Obviously not - you want it right up and personal - and so you will and are doing all that you can, by any devious method possible, to destroy any chance of a peace - what the hell sort of people are you really? I used to think you had kindness in your hearts but you do not - a dreadful hatefulness has overcome you all = so consumed with hatred you will bring down the whole of civilization out of spite.
They wanted Economic Sanctions against a brutal dictator... jumping from Economic sanctions to war is misrepresenting what Clinton and Obama were doing.
 
What bull shit! What a twisting of the truth =

The Truth being the 1st casualty of the war you all so desperately want! Have your Clinton and Obama not spilt enough blood for ya? Obviously not - you want it right up and personal - and so you will and are doing all that you can, by any devious method possible, to destroy any chance of a peace - what the hell sort of people are you really? I used to think you had kindness in your hearts but you do not - a dreadful hatefulness has overcome you all = so consumed with hatred you will bring down the whole of civilization out of spite.

I know...you...and you alone...know the "truth"...about everything. Pardon me as I stifle my laughter.

You have this weird idea that Trump is a peace monger...as he desires to ramp up our military, increase our nuclear warheads...and begin to "win wars".

Insanity.
 
Did they meet in the course of the campaign?

The answer is...Yes. That is not the answer Sessions supplied.

In the context of "a continuing exchange of information" between the campaign and the Russians. Did you forget the context (again)?
 
I know...you...and you alone...know the "truth"...about everything. Pardon me as I stifle my laughter.

You have this weird idea that Trump is a peace monger...as he desires to ramp up our military, increase our nuclear warheads...and begin to "win wars".

Insanity.

I have this weird idea that I just saw Clinton and Obama destroy civil order on all continents of our Planet - by varying degrees.

That in one change of admin peace will come out of America would be, to put it mildly, unrealistic but that Trump's intent is to pull us back from the brink is not - No peace is remotely possible without the States and Russia being friends - not possible - impossible - And so you and the rest of the Obama/Clinton/ Corporate/War industry/ Soros and co-ites will bring down any possibility of this friendship - It is you who wants war at any cost - any cost.

We are not blind - we see you - we see your other face - it is of the devil.
 
In the context of "a continuing exchange of information" between the campaign and the Russians. Did you forget the context (again)?

Did...Sessions...meet?

He said no. The truthful answer is...yes.

I know you know the difference.
 
Back
Top