New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

“Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead” (Ben Franklin)

ben franklin we stop leaks fast.jpg​
Patrick Duval, governor Massachusetts, was first up in the morning news cycle when I turned on the TV before work. Beginning now, there will be no more releases of information on Dead Terrorists Society members ‘ welfare benefits. No start dates. No stop dates. No tidbits that benefits might have been cancelled due Tsarnarev’s wife working 80’s a week – plus caring for an infant – while her husband surfed Jihadist websites and bomb diagrams.

I was tempted to include some sort of aphorism about locking the barn after the horse is out, but Ben Franklin is still revered across all elements of the US political spectrum.

The inquiring reader might ask “On what basis does Governor Patrick Duval suspend the public’s right to know about Tsarnarev’s (apparently) lifelong welfare benefits?”

Governor Duvall replies: “Privacy”. I shit you not. That’s his reason.

This is a stunning precedent – the dead are entitled to not having their misdeeds reported or debated. The relatives of those who passed away from apparent medical malpractice are likely to be astonished to find that the pertinent diagnosis and treatment records are sealed due to privacy, and the perpetrator will escape examination and penalty in THOSE situations too.

Actually, I suspect it was the privacy of Massachusetts bureaucrats which Mr. Duval had top of mind. This is no different than a Bernie Madoff or an Enron trying to suppress evidence of misdeeds. The difference, of course, is that Mr. Duvall the power to cow and intimidate state employees that a corporate CEO could only dream about.

The operative message here is “We don’t wish to learn from our mistakes. It might not work out in our favor.”

The public trust, indeed.

Full disclosure – just wondering – shouldn’t the 20 boxes of confidential documents – including bank records, emails, and other incriminating evidence – taken from Bin Laden’s bedroom after he was shot in the head have been subject to similar “privacy” concerns? After all, he had no ability to consent to their release after he passed away, either.
 
What possible misdeed are you thinking the Governor is guilty of? Is it possible that you are thinking some bureaucrat intentionally funded terrorist activities through welfare payments? Silliest shit yet.

Madoff and the smart guys who ripped off a lot of people and billions of dollars and their personal finances were intermingled with that theft. If there was welfare fraud involved then that info should be public....if not, no.
 
What possible misdeed are you thinking the Governor is guilty of?

middle -sorry if the gist of my post eludes anyone. i tried to make it obvious. "Governor Duval is facetiously asserting the privacy of a dead terrorist to prevent discussion of Tamerlan Tsarnaevs welfare eligibility, and whether those eligibilty rules make sense."
 
His welfare payments ended in 2012. I posted a link on that yesterday. The bombing was planned and carried out in a couple of weeks. His wife was working in healthcare 16 hours a day. He wasn't enabled by welfare.
 
No, the "gist" of you post is obvious. It seems you missed mine....the "welfare eligibility" of Tsarnaev and his wife is irrelevant.
 
His welfare payments ended in 2012. I posted a link on that yesterday. The bombing was planned and carried out in a couple of weeks. His wife was working in healthcare 16 hours a day. He wasn't enabled by welfare.

zigzagg - so you're theory is that collecting welfare IN ADDITION to his wifes earnings from 80 hours working each week didn't "enable" Tsarnaev to ignore getting a job, and free up time to jihad-surf?

what novel "logic"
 
Back
Top