37%. I bet he declares war on somebody to get those numbers up.
trump approval soars to
- Thread starter middleview
- Start date
Neo In The Matrix
The Matrix Is All Around You
Actually, it's 49% approval right now. Next week it'll be 55% or better, thanks to the exoneration bump Trump is bound to get. Stay informed!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...p_administration/trump_approval_index_history
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...p_administration/trump_approval_index_history
llovejim
Current Champion
you are quoting rassmussen. you may just as well quote what Hannity "thinks" about trump's approval. and there was no exoneration..but other than that- great post!!
rassmussen has long been the most fox like of all the national polls. it is like they only ask elderly white guys what they think....
here is the latest RCP average for most major polls I could find-
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average 4/1 - 4/18 -- 43.9 52.1 -8.2
Rasmussen Reports 4/16 - 4/18 1500 LV 49 51 -2
The Hill/HarrisX 4/15 - 4/16 1000 RV 46 54 -8
Reuters/Ipsos 4/15 - 4/16 1006 A 40 56 -16
FOX News 4/14 - 4/16 1005 RV 45 51 -6
Economist/YouGov 4/13 - 4/16 1186 RV 43 52 -9
Monmouth 4/11 - 4/15 711 RV 40 54 -14
Politico/Morning Consult 4/12 - 4/14 1998 RV 44 51 -7
Emerson 4/11 - 4/14 914 RV 43 49 -6
Gallup 4/1 - 4/9 1012 A 45 51 -6
And here is what your own link said!! what are you talking about? Anyway? His numbers from the 19th are down from what they were on the 17th...
Trump Approval Index History
Date
Approval Index, Strong App, Strong Dis, Total App, Total Dis
(approval index is difference between strongly approve and strongly disapprove)
19-Apr-19: -6 , 36% , 42% , 49% , 51%
18-Apr-19: -6 , 35% , 41% , 50% , 50%
17-Apr-19: -2 , 37% , 39% , 52% , 48%
from the link you sourced-
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...p_administration/trump_approval_index_history
Last edited:
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
If you scrolled down, you would see this
(But since you can't read, or spell, I will post this for the others with a brain):
From Rasmussen's Site:
Some readers wonder how we come up with our job approval ratings for the president since they often don’t show as dramatic a change as some other pollsters do. It depends on how you ask the question and whom you ask.
To get a sense of longer-term job approval trends for the president, Rasmussen Reports compiles our tracking data on a full month-by-month basis.
Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology).
Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. To reach those who have abandoned traditional landline telephones, Rasmussen Reports uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters is +/- 2.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Platinum Members.
llovejim
Current Champion
good post. an honest attempt to debate!! kudos!! but let me put in a caveat when you use a poll known to skew towards the republican and towards republican policies way more than any consensus- you are trying to verify a sketchy polling site by POSTING WHAT THEY SAY!! it would be weird if they did admit they screwed the pooch so often due to their failed methodology.
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
You mean the most accurate poll (2016 Presidential poll- since this IS the President). Got it. Sorry pedoJim.
https://americanresearchgroup.com/ratings/2016/uspresident/
It's a bullshit poll, probably taken at CNN.
llovejim
Current Champion
wrong. clinton got 4% more of the popular vote than trump.
In the final count, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote of the 2016 presidential election was nearly three million votes. According to the independent, non-partisan Cook Political Report, Clinton's final tally came in at 65,844,610, compared to Donald Trump's 62,979,636, with a difference of 2,864,974.Dec 20, 2016
Hillary Clinton's Final Popular Vote Lead Is 2.8 Million | Time
time.com/4608555/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final/
now, using math, which i know confuses most right wingers- if you take hillary's popular vote total and trump's you see that hillary's is 4% higher. (actually, a little more than 4%, but who's counting?)
llovejim
Current Champion
funny..someone relying on rassmussen but discounting the far more accurate CNN!!! good job. here is a cookie!!
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
Now this was using the FEC ( That's Federal Election Commission)
What You didn't read is below:
2016 US Presidential Election Pollster Ratings
The following table lists the accuracy of pollsters in the November 8, 2016 US Presidential election using the measure of polling accuracy proposed by Martin, Traugott, and Kennedy.
An accuracy measure of 0.00 indicates that the odds ratio of the survey results matches the odds ratio of the actual results (the closer to 0.00, the better).
2016 Presidential Election
Clinton Trump Odds
Ratio Accuracy
Rasmussen 45% 43% 1.00 0.00
UPI/CVOTER 49% 46% 1.02 0.02
CBS/NY Times 45% 42% 1.02 0.02
Politico/Morning Consult 45% 42% 1.02 0.02
McClatchy/Marist 44% 43% 0.98 -0.02
Bloomberg/Selzer 44% 41% 1.03 0.03
Reuters/Ipsos 42% 39% 1.03 0.03
Fox News 48% 44% 1.04 0.04
Boston Herald/Franklin Pierce/RKM 48% 44% 1.04 0.04
Angus Reid 48% 44% 1.04 0.04
ABC/Washington Post 47% 43% 1.05 0.04
Gravis Marketing 47% 43% 1.05 0.04*
Economist/YouGov 45% 41% 1.05 0.05
CBS News 45% 41% 1.05 0.05
Insights West 45% 41% 1.05 0.05
NBC/WSJ 44% 40% 1.05 0.05
Times-Picayune/Lucid 45% 40% 1.08 0.07
Monmouth 50% 44% 1.09 0.08
NBC/SurveyMonkey 47% 41% 1.10 0.09*
IBD/TIPP 43% 45% 0.91 -0.09
Pew 46% 40% 1.10 0.10
LA Times/USC 44% 47% 0.89 -0.12*
USA Today/Suffolk 49% 39% 1.20 0.18*
CNBC/Hart/POS 43% 33% 1.25 0.22*
Saint Leo University 45% 34% 1.27 0.24*
Actual 48.18% 46.09%
*The accuracy measures for the Gravis Marketing poll (sample size of 16,639), the USA Today/Suffolk poll (sample size of 1,000), the Saint Leo University poll (sample size of 1,050), the NBC/SurveyMonkey poll (sample size of 70,194), the CNBC/Hart/Public Opinion Strategies poll (sample size of 804), and the LA Times/USC poll (sample size of 2,972) fall outside the 95% confidence intervals.
The accuracy measures for the other 19 polls fall within the 95% confidence intervals.
The average absolute accuracy for all polls in 2016 is 0.070. The median absolute accuracy for all polls in 2016 is 0.049. The average absolute accuracy for the 19 polls in 2016 where the accuracy measures fall within the respective 95% confidence intervals is 0.045.
The average absolute accuracy for all polls in the 2012 presidential election was 0.055. Three polls in 2012 had accuracy measures fall outside the 95% confidence intervals (YouGov, Rasmussen, and Gallup).
The average absolute accuracy for all polls in the 2008 presidential election was 0.037. None of the polls in 2008 had accuracy measures outiside of the 95% confidence intervals.
So I get it right, today POLLS ARE GOOD, and when Trumps numbers fall below 40% they will be wrong - correct - Just trying to keep up with the flip flop - right or wrong scorecard !
Constitutional Sheepdog
][][][%er!!!!!!!
And now this poll brought to you by the same people who predicted Hillary would win
So the whole thread is bs then, thanks I knew someone would post the Hillary Poll standby
llovejim
Current Champion
and I say even using your data it shows rassmussen was the worst in 2012, when they picked romney. they are still the worst, if you assume the average of many polls has to be more accurate than any certain one of 10 or so. when you count votes for hillary versus votes for trump, which is really what the 2016 election was all about- rassmussen was the least accurate. LIKE I SHOWED EARLIER- CLINTON BEAT TRUMP BY 4% IN THE POPULAR ELECTION RESULTS, RASSMUSSEN ADMITS THEY HAD HER WINNING BY ONLY 2%....ALMOST ALL OTHERS, IF NOT ALL OTHERS, HAD HER WINNING BY MORE THAN 2% AND WERE CLOSER.
llovejim
Current Champion
i guess the difference it makes only applies to those of us who care about the truth, not right wing robots and stooges who avoid the truth like they avoid bath water.
Nostra
Governor
Second most accurate in 2016.
The second most accurate poll according to the report was the national Rasmussen poll of likely voters. Although the end result showed that Clinton would win the race, the overall numbers are very close to the results, as long as you just count the popular vote. Clinton led Trump by 2 percentage points in the poll, nearly the same number as she led Trump in the overall popular vote.
Truth=popular vote doesn't decide POTUS election
your white Sow will never be President nor present front runner if top dem/libs have their way
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-17/again-are-establishment-democrats-plotting-sabotage-bernie
(an you cried that CS only insults) hypocrite
Trump gets no bump in his approval rating
following the Mueller report "totally exonerating him??
LOL
following the Mueller report "totally exonerating him??
LOL
Neo In The Matrix
The Matrix Is All Around You
It hasn't been out a full week yet. Once people see the charade that the leftist media pulled on them they will have more faith in their president. There was never any collusion. They was never any obstruction. Trump is EXONERATED, totally and fully. No more indictments. So when this information propagates throughout the entire electorate, people will start tuning out the lamestream media and Trump will see a 2 - 5% ratings bump. This is science, people.
