Trump nominates EPA hater, global warming denier to run EPA

[Bugsy McGurk]

As Trump's agenda to destroy the nation, and perhaps even the world, continues to take shape....

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/index.html

 

[connieb]

As Trump's agenda to destroy the nation, and perhaps even the world, continues to take shape....

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/index.html

SUWEEEAT. Drain that swamp!

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

SUWEEEAT. Drain that swamp!

I think the goal of this swine is to kill off the swamps. Literally. So the establishment type swamp creatures can make even more money at the expense of the environment and the future well being of the planet.

 

[connieb]

I think the goal of this swine is to kill off the swamps. Literally. So the establishment type swamp creatures can make even more money at the expense of the environment and the future well being of the planet.

The EPA has been practically a rogue organization. It is time someone really hard core reigned them in.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

The EPA has been practically a rogue organization. It is time someone really hard core reigned them in.

What EPA actions do you oppose?

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

good what did you expect Trump to place a warmer as head of the EPA? liberals your days are numbered.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

good what did you expect Trump to place a warmer as head of the EPA? liberals your days are numbered.

Nope. I fully expected Trump to appoint an EPA chief who will take a wrecking ball to the environment. He has done so.

 

[connieb]

What EPA actions do you oppose?

http://reason.org/blog/show/two-examples-of-epa-overreach
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/245201-drowning-by-epa-overreach

The pond one I found particularly egregious.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/its-time-to-stop-the-epas-overreach/article/2578132

Just the tip of the iceberg.

 

[justoffal]

What EPA actions do you oppose?

The Political ones....the ones that have nothing to do with the Environment.

JO

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

http://reason.org/blog/show/two-examples-of-epa-overreach
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/245201-drowning-by-epa-overreach

The pond one I found particularly egregious.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/its-time-to-stop-the-epas-overreach/article/2578132

Just the tip of the iceberg.

Besides searching the web for something to oppose, can you tell me in your own words which EPA actions you oppose?

Easier yet, what was their worst action, in your opinion?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

The Political ones....the ones that have nothing to do with the Environment.

JO

Such as?

 

[connieb]

Besides searching the web for something to oppose, can you tell me in your own words which EPA actions you oppose?

Easier yet, what was their worst action, in your opinion?

The worst action off the top of my head was as I said in my post their rules about the water and how they attacked a person for building a pond on his own land.

It is by far easier to say, that I mostly don't agree with much of what the EPA does, than list the numerous ways its bad. I despise a bully gov't, and EPA has been nothing but a bully for rural people for decades.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

The worst action off the top of my head was as I said in my post their rules about the water and how they attacked a person for building a pond on his own land.

It is by far easier to say, that I mostly don't agree with much of what the EPA does, than list the numerous ways its bad. I despise a bully gov't, and EPA has been nothing but a bully for rural people for decades.

EPA doesn't typically ban ponds. Why did they ban the pond in question, and why did they err?

BTW, if the worst thing they did was make some pond decision, they're doing pretty good.

;-)

 

[Dawg]

As Trump's agenda to destroy the nation, and perhaps even the world, continues to take shape....

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/index.html

Election have consequence..............according to ya boy Θ

 

[Dawg]

I think the goal of this swine is to kill off the swamps. Literally. So the establishment type swamp creatures can make even more money at the expense of the environment and the future well being of the planet.

I'm aware libs are not accustom to their candidates doing what they promised while campaigning, but, the reason Trump won is because that's what WE THE PEOPLE want done..............PC is drowning

 

[Dawg]

Besides searching the web for something to oppose, can you tell me in your own words which EPA actions you oppose?

Easier yet, what was their worst action, in your opinion?

Can't collect Rain Water on your own property..........................

without Link libs cry FAKE

you just sank craig's battleship if he can't google

 

[resident_evil]

As Trump's agenda to destroy the nation, and perhaps even the world, continues to take shape....

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/index.html

So what?

BTW, CNNzuckers is not a valid source and I never ever click those fake news links.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I'm aware libs are not accustom to their candidates doing what they promised while campaigning, but, the reason Trump won is because that's what WE THE PEOPLE want done..............PC is drowning

I don't remember Trump saying he was going to hire an EPA hater to run the EPA and wreck the environment.

Can you link me?

;-)

 

[connieb]

EPA doesn't typically ban ponds. Why did they ban the pond in question, and why did they err?

BTW, if the worst thing they did was make some pond decision, they're doing pretty good.

;-)

Doesn't "typically" is not good enough.

This was just one example of a gross over reach. The articles I linked discussed many many more. I think as a matter of policy however, that the EPA should only be involved in aspects of the environment that are universal to all the states, beyond that, it should be governed by state to state rules and regulations. And, the EPA can be a mediator or tie breaker when the issue is between two states. So, no, I don't think every stream or waterway in the US should be under the EPA's purview. period.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Doesn't "typically" is not good enough.

This was just one example of a gross over reach. The articles I linked discussed many many more. I think as a matter of policy however, that the EPA should only be involved in aspects of the environment that are universal to all the states, beyond that, it should be governed by state to state rules and regulations. And, the EPA can be a mediator or tie breaker when the issue is between two states. So, no, I don't think every stream or waterway in the US should be under the EPA's purview. period.

I guess I'll always have to wonder what your problem is with the "pond" decision. Let's move on....

I note that the three pieces you link all contain the words "EPA overreach." Did you Google for articles using those words?