a former chiropractor, has just canceled a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump...
Wow.
Wow.
Last edited:
Lefty...driven SO bonkers by Trump...that he cannot make even a one sentence post without error.a former chiropractor, has just cancemed a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump...
Wow.
I was wondering what was the importance of mentioning that he was a former chiropractor?Lefty...driven SO bonkers by Trump...that he cannot make even a one sentence post without error.
You guys and Trump DESERVE one another.
One bloody sentence...a bridge too far.
Snowflake Trumpies can't handle the truth.a former chiropractor, has just canceled a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump...
Wow.
You never make an error typing on a cell phone with your thumbs? Try addressing the facts. I've corrected the mistyped word.Lefty...driven SO bonkers by Trump...that he cannot make even a one sentence post without error.
You guys and Trump DESERVE one another.
One bloody sentence...a bridge too far.
I don't post frantically. I find calm, measured reason and rationality infinitely preferable to cockeyed rambling (and the rigid, unbending one-party loyalty is rather distasteful as well).You never make an error typing on a cell phone with your thumbs? Try addressing the facts. I've corrected the mistyped word.
Former actress and chiropractor, Carla Sands canceled a NATO conference because Stanley Sloan had criticized Trump...I don't post frantically. I find calm, measured reason and rationality infinitely preferable to cockeyed rambling (and the rigid, unbending one-party loyalty is rather distasteful as well).
Ah well...you do you, MV.
As for the earth-shattering bit of news you were breaking...uhh...ok. Which affront is it this time? Trump's thin skin? A chiropractor as ambassador to Denmark? Poor management and follow-thru regarding NATO? All of the above? Ice cream scoops? What?
It's hair-on-fire all the time with you guys, so it becomes rather difficult to take you seriously. Another day...another DEFCON-1 catastrophe...
a former chiropractor, has just canceled a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump...
Wow.
measured? reasonable? not measured nor reasonable to ignore the issue in favor of an attack based on a mistyped word.I don't post frantically. I find calm, measured reason and rationality infinitely preferable to cockeyed rambling (and the rigid, unbending one-party loyalty is rather distasteful as well).
Ah well...you do you, MV.
As for the earth-shattering bit of news you were breaking...uhh...ok. Which affront is it this time? Trump's thin skin? A chiropractor as ambassador to Denmark? Poor management and follow-thru regarding NATO? All of the above? Ice cream scoops? What?
It's hair-on-fire all the time with you guys, so it becomes rather difficult to take you seriously. Another day...another DEFCON-1 catastrophe...
Fascinating. Real cloak and dagger stuff. Intrigue...romance...mystery...this scoop has it all.Former actress and chiropractor, Carla Sands canceled a NATO conference because Stanley Sloan had criticized Trump...
Calm down and try posting a bit less frantically. You may find that you achieve better results. Maybe next time...when you post about Trump's choice of breakfast cereal (that, no doubt, does not stay crispy in milk)...you will do so in flawless fashion.measured? reasonable? not measured nor reasonable to ignore the issue in favor of an attack based on a mistyped word.
You never make an error typing on a cell phone with your thumbs? Try addressing the facts. I've corrected the mistyped word.
Former actress and chiropractor, Carla Sands canceled a NATO conference because Stanley Sloan had criticized Trump...
a former chiropractor, has just canceled a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump...
Wow.
google ambassador denmark natoLink?
Her veto and censorship of an expert on the topic of NATO caused the cancellation. It is all about silencing critics and Sands knew it would result in cancellation.You chose to post here; "Trump's ambassador to Denmark...a former chiropractor, has just canceled a nato conference because one of the speakers has criticized Trump..."
That simply is not the truth. Meaning that it is, instead....What?
Perhaps you should have read the New York Times article on this matter? It actually states; "Carla Sands, the United States ambassador to Denmark, did not want Mr. Sloan to participate, and the Danish Atlantic Council “had no other option” than to revoke his invitation to speak Lars Bangert Struwe, the secretary general of the council, said in a statement.
OK, nothing odd there, supports your claim about the ambassador so far.
But it THEN also says; "On Sunday morning, Mr. Struwe canceled the NATO conference."
Wait...…….What?
"Mr. Struwe canceled the NATO conference."?????
Might that be the very same Mr. "Struwe, the secretary general of the council,", that we see referenced above? Why, yes, it is indeed.
So it was in fact, the secretary general of the council who canceled the conference and NOT the dreaded former chiropractor as this poster told us all?
Appears so...….
The same Mr. Struwe who said in an interview that, "From a Danish point of view, the decision to bar Mr. Sloan would turn the conference’s focus to internal American politics and away from the future of NATO, " but did it anyway?
Yep. That one.
Not to mention where it said Mr. Sloan had been added to the program at the last minute — without the same joint decision-making used in recruiting the other speakers. (12).
Hummmmmm……….wonder why THAT might be?
And even further into the article we read, "The event’s cancellation was “unfortunate,” the embassy said, as it would have provided speakers and attendees an opportunity to exchange views and strengthen NATO for the future.
Now why on earth would the embassy say a decision they made was "unfortunate"? What was unfortunate is the feeling that any and every event held in Europe requires having everyone involved with speaking to share a hatred for Trump and/or the US and if one gets cut the entire event has to be canceled.
In any event the truth of the matter is that your post is a bold faced untruth.
The secretary general of the council canceled the conference, NOT the ambassador as you claimed.
Her veto and censorship of an expert on the topic of NATO caused the cancellation. It is all about silencing critics and Sands knew it would result in cancellation.
Her veto and censorship of an expert on the topic of NATO caused the cancellation. It is all about silencing critics and Sands knew it would result in cancellation.
Her veto and censorship of an expert on the topic of NATO caused the cancellation. It is all about silencing critics and Sands knew it would result in cancellation.