resident_evil
Senator
I'm not asking you to go away from the world and not even PJ but just this thread because you're so wrong here it is pitiful.Even if I go away, the facts don’t go away. Except in Trumplandia.
I'm not asking you to go away from the world and not even PJ but just this thread because you're so wrong here it is pitiful.Even if I go away, the facts don’t go away. Except in Trumplandia.
I'm not asking you to go away from the world and not even PJ but just this thread because you're so wrong here it is pitiful.
Wtf!?!Section 245(i) is not amnesty for illegal immigrants. It allows people who entered the US legally, but failed to maintain legal status to change status and file for permanent resident.
So if a student entered the US, their visa expired and they didn't reapply...rather than having to return to their home country, they could apply to have their status adjusted upon payment of a $1,000 fine.
https://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/245(I)
Nacara was not about illegal immigrants.
The Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act stated that Nicaraguans, Cubans, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, nationals of former Soviet bloc countries, and their dependents are able to become legal permanent residents of the United States provided that they were registered asylums seekers who had stayed in the United States for at least 5 years since December 1, 1995.
As of 2014 it covered 186,220 people.
HRIFA is also not about illegal immigrants. It covers people who entered the US legally and can show a visa with stamps for entry.
he following evidence should be submitted with Form I-485:
Two passport-style photos
Copy of government issued photo identification
Copy of birth certificate
Copy of passport page with nonimmigrant visa (if applicable)
Copy of passport pages with admission (entry) or parole stamps (if applicable)
Copy of Form(s) I-94, Admission/Departure Record (if applicable)
Evidence of Haitian citizenship or nationality
Evidence of your family relationship (spousal or parent-child) to the principal applicant. [This relationship must have existed at the time the principal applicant was granted adjustment of status and continue to exist up until you are granted adjustment of status.]
Evidence of continuous physical presence in the United States since December 31, 1995 (if you are an unmarried son or daughter 21 years or older of a HRIFA principal) along with a statement providing your last arrival in the U.S. before December 31, 1995, all departures and arrivals from the United States up until present, with the reason for each departure and the date, manner, and place of each return to the United States
Form I-693, Report of Medical Exam and Vaccination Record
Police clearances from each municipality where you have resided after your 14th birthday and for six months or longer since arriving in the U.S.
Certified copies of court records (if you have ever been arrested)
Applicable fees
LMAO........you guys are pathetic.
Which party supports sanctuary cities? That's your answer.
You're the problem not the solution.Of course. Although he was deported twice under Clinton, “Democrats let him stay.” And although he reentered the USA under GWB, “Democrats let him in.”
Trumplandia, where up is down.
;-)
Section 245(i) is not amnesty for illegal immigrants. It allows people who entered the US legally, but failed to maintain legal status to change status and file for permanent resident.
So if a student entered the US, their visa expired and they didn't reapply...rather than having to return to their home country, they could apply to have their status adjusted upon payment of a $1,000 fine.
https://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/245(I)
Nacara was not about illegal immigrants.
The Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act stated that Nicaraguans, Cubans, Salvadorans, Guatemalans, nationals of former Soviet bloc countries, and their dependents are able to become legal permanent residents of the United States provided that they were registered asylums seekers who had stayed in the United States for at least 5 years since December 1, 1995.
As of 2014 it covered 186,220 people.
HRIFA is also not about illegal immigrants. It covers people who entered the US legally and can show a visa with stamps for entry.
he following evidence should be submitted with Form I-485:
Two passport-style photos
Copy of government issued photo identification
Copy of birth certificate
Copy of passport page with nonimmigrant visa (if applicable)
Copy of passport pages with admission (entry) or parole stamps (if applicable)
Copy of Form(s) I-94, Admission/Departure Record (if applicable)
Evidence of Haitian citizenship or nationality
Evidence of your family relationship (spousal or parent-child) to the principal applicant. [This relationship must have existed at the time the principal applicant was granted adjustment of status and continue to exist up until you are granted adjustment of status.]
Evidence of continuous physical presence in the United States since December 31, 1995 (if you are an unmarried son or daughter 21 years or older of a HRIFA principal) along with a statement providing your last arrival in the U.S. before December 31, 1995, all departures and arrivals from the United States up until present, with the reason for each departure and the date, manner, and place of each return to the United States
Form I-693, Report of Medical Exam and Vaccination Record
Police clearances from each municipality where you have resided after your 14th birthday and for six months or longer since arriving in the U.S.
Certified copies of court records (if you have ever been arrested)
Applicable fees
You're the problem not the solution.
What do you think sanctuary city means?
Of course. Although he was deported twice under Clinton, “Democrats let him stay.” And although he reentered the USA under GWB, “Democrats let him in.”
Trumplandia, where up is down.
;-)
Just go away.Truth is not a “problem.”
Except in Trumplandia.
Which party supports sanctuary cities?
Neither. That term is too vague for rational discussion.
Democrats are basically ignorant people. They are typically uneducated and the kids who go to college, come out more f**ed up than they were before they went in. Before they attended a Liberal university, they were merely ignorant. After Liberal indoctrination they become educated idiots who are incapable of extracting urine from cowboy footwear.Why are democrats so uniformed and wrong all the time?
Are you f**ing serious? Did you really just say that?Neither. That term is too vague for rational discussion.
It's all about MAWA.....that Trump and his deplorables' antipathy towards brown people.What's a matter don't want to answer the question? You would have been better off not replying at all.
A Sanctuary city is a city that limits its cooperation with the Federal Government when it comes to enforcing immigration law.
Which party supports those cities?
Sickofleft said: ↑
Which party supports sanctuary cities?
Are you f**ing serious? Did you really just say that?
That must be the Democrat motto, Julie.It's all about MAWA.....that Trump and his deplorables' antipathy towards brown people.
It's all about MAWA.....that Trump and his deplorables' antipathy towards brown people.
That must be the Democrat motto, Julie.
Make America Weak Again.