New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Tsk tsk, President Obama:

J

Jen

Senator
Obama has been President for 4 years and he has to run on President Clinton's economic record.

LINK

You're the president and all you can say is the last Democrat before I became president really knew how to run an economy. It's like Eisenhower seeking re-election in '56 running on the Coolidge economy. If there was an admission that Obama doesn't have anything he can run on and that they are somewhat running scared, is when you have to go back, what is it a decade and say, 'Look how he did. Ignore the four years I've been in office, pretend it's the Clinton re-election campaign.'
Click to expand...

That should round up a few votes, huh. :thumb:
 
Jen said:
Obama has been President for 4 years and he has to run on President Clinton's economic record.

LINK



That should round up a few votes, huh. :thumb:
Click to expand...


an influx of hundreds of billions of dollars out of defense into the, into social programs and the private economy. That happens once in a lifetime.


Let's make it a second time! :thumb:
 
Craig said:


an influx of hundreds of billions of dollars out of defense into the, into social programs and the private economy. That happens once in a lifetime.


Let's make it a second time! :thumb:
Click to expand...

LeRoy: No earthly reason we shouldn't. But Mitt Rmoney wants to ramp up defense spending by 20%. [We need to worry about an invasion by those barbaric Canadians...]
 
LeRoy_Was_Here said:
LeRoy: No earthly reason we shouldn't. But Mitt Rmoney wants to ramp up defense spending by 20%. [We need to worry about an invasion by those barbaric Canadians...]
Click to expand...

No reason whatsoever. We've ramped up for 10 years...and there is no danger of invasion...just as there never has been any danger of invasion. Canadians be be soothed with poutine and Labatt's...it's those crazed lunatics from the Grand Duchy of Fenwick that concern me.

MouseThatRoared03.jpg
 
Jen said:
Obama has been President for 4 years and he has to run on President Clinton's economic record.

LINK



That should round up a few votes, huh. :thumb:
Click to expand...

whadya expect him to do, run on the principals of a the Bush/Bush/Reagan economy, which brought about the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression?

Oh, wait, that's what Romney/Ryan are running on...... tsk tsk indeed!
 
Well, since he can't run on his own record for the last 4 years, I guess I do expect him to run on Clinton's record.



Judy1 said:
whadya expect him to do, run on the principals of a the Bush/Bush/Reagan economy, which brought about the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression?

Oh, wait, that's what Romney/Ryan are running on...... tsk tsk indeed!
Click to expand...
 
I would say it is a pretty good record to run on. Below you can see to upward curve during his administration. Just draw a line. Why is this ignored?jobs1.jpg
 
Jen said:
Well, since he can't run on his own record for the last 4 years, I guess I do expect him to run on Clinton's record.
Click to expand...
Well, i just watched it, and what a surprise Kraut swine lies and you fall for it.
Clinton said that we should continue on Obama path. I guess the path, the record, the achievements the direction , whatever other synonyms, but they do apply to Obama Presidency, what Clinton said
 
Jen said:
Well, since he can't run on his own record for the last 4 years, I guess I do expect him to run on Clinton's record.
Click to expand...

No, what he is doing is giving Clinton the credit he has always deserved. Something cons can't bring themselves to do.
It's called THE TRUTH...something cons aren't familiar with.
 
How benevolent of Obama to give Clinton credit..........during the Obama 2012 campaign......:rofl:

NinaS said:
No, what he is doing is giving Clinton the credit he has always deserved. Something cons can't bring themselves to do.
It's called THE TRUTH...something cons aren't familiar with.
Click to expand...
 
Remember when the surplus turned to the headline "worst crisis since 30's, no end yet in sight" ??

That wasn't GW Bush's fault, it was Clinton's!! According to some.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top