New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Twitter Censors Candace Owens for Wrong-Think on Michigan's Gov.

Mr. Friscus

Governor
On Friday, conservative commentator Candace Owens was suspended from Twitter over a post slamming “dictator” Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) and encouraging Michigan protesters to go back to work even if they are deemed so-called “non-essential.”

INITIAL CENSORED TWEET: “Apparently [Whitmer] believes she is a duly elected dictator of a socialist country, The people of Michigan need to stand up to her. Open your businesses. Go to work. The police think she’s crazy too. They are not going to arrest 10,000,000 people for going to work.”​

Reporter Benny Johnson posted a screenshot of the tweet with the caption

JOHNSON TWEET: "Candace Owens has been suspended from Twitter. Candace tweeted that people in Michigan should go back to work. What rule did she break? Not even Twitter can say. Candace Owens tells people to work and gets cancelled but [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)] can tell people *not* to work and all good,”​

Owens stood for her tweet:
​
OWENS: “I unequivocally stand by every single word of my tweet, If Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can use Twitter’s platform to encourage workers to walk out and boycott — I should be allowed to encourage lawful citizens to resume work. The only person breaking any laws is governor-turned-dictator Gretchen Whitmer, who is impoverishing millions, ignoring the votes of her state legislature, and as a result, rolling over the constitutionally protected rights of Michigan citizens. Twitter was unable or unwilling to provide me with any specific rule that I violated, which is why I have appealed their decision. While I am not an expert on Twitter TOS, I cannot see how suggesting people ought to work would be a violation of anything other than socialist reverie."​


So let's iron this out:

1. You're free to disagree with Candace Owens, and even find her speech aggressive and outright "dangerous" or wrong. That's fine.​
​
2. Twitter has the right to set a standard of public demands such as this, with people recommending what the mass public should do.​

The problem becomes when Twitter allows AOC to say "Don't go back to work", but Censors Owens for saying "Go back to work". And along with the censorship, the further problem is that there's no explanation.

So while trying to represent themselves as some open platform, Twitter is clearly just another entity with a political narrative and agenda that they'll act on to promote, acting against their "enemies' while allowing their "friends' to do the exact same thing.

Double standards are all over the place on the left these days. This is just another example of a leftist organization using them. I wish the left would at least try to employ some level of consistency in their actions, even if it's just to try to get people off of their tail. That's what's crazy, it's not even much hidden.
 
Why don't they just start some right-wing version of twitter?
gab.com

The only responsibility Twitter has it to its shareholders, who definitely don't want their platform turned into some free-for-all of bullshit.
a) Twitter has an essentially monopoly position. (a monopoly position doesn't require being the sole player in a market space). Like other monopolies, it has a greater responsibility than to its shareholders exclusively. What it does when censoring legal speech is legal; it is not right.
b) Mainstream conservative views like Owens' can hardly be labelled legitimately as free-for-all bullshirt.
 
Yes, Twitter doesn't want to become Gab.com.

a) Twitter has an essentially monopoly position. (a monopoly position doesn't require being the sole player in a market space). Like other monopolies, it has a greater responsibility than to its shareholders exclusively. What it does when censoring legal speech is legal; it is not right.
Twitter doesn't have a monopoly on anything. There are any number of places you place online ads, there are any number of social media outlets. And there are precisely zero barriers to entering the social media space.
b) Mainstream conservative views like Owens' can hardly be labelled legitimately as free-for-all bullshirt.
They can, I just did.
 
You say that now... but by your logic, nobody ever has the right to say anything is unfair.
That is not my logic
Might makes right.
The only they makes her weak is her own stupidity, she should pull herself up by her bootstraps and head on down to Gab.com, where she can be as stupid as she wants to be.
Hope you've never advocated for the poor, minorities, etc. You'd be contradicting yourself.
Advocating for the poor is not the same thing as advocating for the stupid.
 
Back
Top