So then, what someone else says is ok. Got it.....
That was probably the most athletic leap to a conclusion I've seen you make.
So then, what someone else says is ok. Got it.....
So then why didn't you just agree that what was said was racist? We all know the names that were given to Obama. No need to bring them up.That was probably the most athletic leap to a conclusion I've seen you make.
Do a little research, Marvin. It was a petition asking for an independent investigation.
You are putting words in my mouth.
Thankfully we aren't having the kind of violence exhibited by Leftists in the mid-1960's and early 1970's.
those mayors who allow civil disobedience and violence in cities.
And, oh by the way......... Please be truthful, @Arkady. Republicans welcome immigrants to this country.
You're quite welcome. I try hard to never insinuate lies.It is better for discussion if you don't insinuate lies into your post. So thanks for not doing that.
I told you what that meant. All you have to do is read it and comprehend.Actually, I was quoting your directly. You did, in fact, speak to your issue with "those who oppose America in general." Now I'm just trying to figure out what you mean by that.
Trying to equate all religious "terrorists".........Muslims = Christians? Is that it?Yes. Overall, most political violence has faded from the left. These days when you find home-grown terrorists, they're generally religious conservatives, or anti-government conservatives. Right-wing political violence isn't a new thing, of course -- the KKK is age-old. But the balancing violence on the left seems to be fading.
I guess you've conveniently forgotten Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings Blake who said this:I'm not aware of mayors who allow violence
Trump said that rapists and criminals were coming here from Mexico and they are. Trump NEVER said that ALL coming through Mexico were criminals. The Left made that addendum and it looks like you bought into that.Some do. Some don't. For example, Trump said that those Mexico was sending here were rapists, and he didn't specify just those without documentation. Trump even has a problem with the kids of immigrants, in some cases -- as with the federal judge he suggested was incompetent to do his job due to ethnic ancestry. Trump also famously called for a big reduction of legal immigration. That, of course, would be expected to BOOST illegal immigration (since the job postings that would have been filled by legal immigrants would be more likely to attract undocumented workers across the border).
You're quite welcome. I try hard to never insinuate lies.
I guess you've conveniently forgotten Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings Blake who said this:
Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake:
“While we tried to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on. We also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well. And we work very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to deescalate, and that’s what you saw.”
Democrats believe in total affirmative action. The numbers must be right. It doesn't matter whether or not people are qualified for a job as long as those numbers are right. We had a lot of affirmative action used in putting the Obama administration into place. Heck, Obama was the first affirmative action president. That's a legacy that won't be taken away.And that's what I'm talking about when I said Democrats tend to elect candidates based on race, gender, and sexual orientation, rather than qualifications for the job. I refuse to believe her opponents in her last election were dumber than she is.
Democrats believe in total affirmative action. The numbers must be right. It doesn't matter whether or not people are qualified for a job as long as those numbers are right. We had a lot of affirmative action used in putting the Obama administration into place. Heck, Obama was the first affirmative action president. That's a legacy that won't be taken away.
So then why didn't you just agree that what was said was racist? We all know the names that were given to Obama. No need to bring them up.
Democrats believe in total affirmative action. The numbers must be right. It doesn't matter whether or not people are qualified for a job as long as those numbers are right. We had a lot of affirmative action used in putting the Obama administration into place. Heck, Obama was the first affirmative action president. That's a legacy that won't be taken away.
No need? I don't know about the quote you are talking about. Who made it and what was the context?
I did a search on the shoeshine boy quote and am asking you if it was racist.
YOU are the one that added "because he is black".Of course you realize that you are being a racist in just that comment....the implication being that a man who is teaching constitutional law, has been a legislator in both the state legislature and the Senate could not be capable of the job...because he is black, and must be voted in because of some affirmative action program.
YOU are the one that added "because he is black".
That is what Leftists do.
They categorize people by skin color.
THAT is what is racist.[/QUOTE]
BINGO!
YOU are the one that added "because he is black".
That is what Leftists do.
They categorize people by skin color.
THAT is what is racist.
I did.Sorry....who brought "Affirmative action" into the equation?
You don't know about the quote....yet you replied to @Leilani's response TO that quote??? Really? So you replied without knowing what she was even talking about? LMAO!! But you'll still argue you were right! Oh my......