Dino
Russian Asset
That was just as helpful as all your other posts....good job.
my gawd almighty.........I'm so tired of Martin/Zimmerman........
where's the post of thousands of black kids that MURDER black kids daily in America............
how about the gang bangers drive-by's that kill other black kids that have nothing to do with the gangs.......
where is boney Sharpton on those murders.........why do black murder blacks daily/nightly and nothing posted about those deaths........GAWD DANMMIT.......inner cities are combat zones........kids/babies dying 24/7/365..but, all the talk is now a hispanic kills a black kid........
betcha before the sun rises, more black teens will be murdered.......by blacks.........report that or STHU
where's the post of thousands of black kids that MURDER black kids daily in America............
how about the gang bangers drive-by's that kill other black kids that have nothing to do with the gangs.......
where is boney Sharpton on those murders.........why do black murder blacks daily/nightly and nothing posted about those deaths........GAWD DANMMIT.......inner cities are combat zones........kids/babies dying 24/7/365..but, all the talk is now a hispanic kills a black kid........
betcha before the sun rises, more black teens will be murdered.......by blacks.........report that or STHU
Look up the meaning of the word rebuttal and see if it matches my comment on your post. (Hint: It doesn't).
There was nothing to rebut. Your post had nothing at all to do with the top post. Every time I have responded to you where you have written a post which included no supported facts, but usually crap that either you have made up, or adopted from some other unsupported allegation from right wing media, I have included evidence to support my disagreement with you. It doesn't surprise me that either you don't remember or that you wouldn't want to remember just how many times I've shown you to be uninformed....."Crippling to my confidence"? You overestimate yourself there, skip.
You responded with a post that was out in the weeds. You think it was a gag, which shows you to have no real sense of humor on top of generally being willfully ignorant....
You're just a republican. Your focus is on criticizing Obama and you think you gain points for the republican side...but in fact you don't....here is an example of your ignorance.
And in exactly how many years did Reagan have a conservative GOP-lead House writing budgets during his presidency?
The House of Representatives doesn't write the budget.
Write it? No, they just ad what they want and vote out the stuff they don't. So you're splicing convenient words while ignoring the big picture.
1. Your initial statement was wrong. It also shows you seem to think the Senate isn't involved and Reagan had a majority in the Senate for 6 years.
2. Your response to me was an attempt to cover up your first post. Splicing convenient words? What the hell does that mean? You can't admit that you were wrong....probably because you'd be doing it so frequently. Stick to opinion and try to avoid pretending you actually have any facts at hand to support you.
Dino
Russian Asset
They absolutely do, I showed you that. This type of actual ignorance is jarring from someone with such a big mouth.
If you were right, then the President's budget would match federal annual outlays. But this is neither historically accurate nor consistent with the budget process. Why?
I told you why, the COngress draws up the budget and sets the spending levels.
Reagan's proposed spending levels were exceeded by the Congress's appropriations annually. These were budget passed by a Democratic House which created bigger debts and deficits than Reagan was requesting. No sane person can deny these facts.
If you were right, then the President's budget would match federal annual outlays. But this is neither historically accurate nor consistent with the budget process. Why?
I told you why, the COngress draws up the budget and sets the spending levels.
Reagan's proposed spending levels were exceeded by the Congress's appropriations annually. These were budget passed by a Democratic House which created bigger debts and deficits than Reagan was requesting. No sane person can deny these facts.
you contradict yourself so often that it is mind numbing.
The house and the senate receive a budget from the President. They each add or subtract what they want in the budget and then reconcile each of those two versions of the president's budget. Once reconciliation is complete they send the joint budget back to the president to sign. The president can either sign it or veto it. Did Reagan ever veto a budget? No.
Did Reagan ever submit a balanced budget? No.
The house and the senate receive a budget from the President. They each add or subtract what they want in the budget and then reconcile each of those two versions of the president's budget. Once reconciliation is complete they send the joint budget back to the president to sign. The president can either sign it or veto it. Did Reagan ever veto a budget? No.
Did Reagan ever submit a balanced budget? No.
You just keep digging the hole deeper....
Dino
Russian Asset
LOL, good answer.
We know the only one with the shovel is you because you're still trying to claim the House doesn't put the budget together for a vote. The thing is 5,000 pages long, it's the Congress, and not the president that puts it together. You're wrong, you know it, and not you're trying to get a snarky last word in.
I can't see how this trifle is so important to you. You must have absolutely nothing going on.
We know the only one with the shovel is you because you're still trying to claim the House doesn't put the budget together for a vote. The thing is 5,000 pages long, it's the Congress, and not the president that puts it together. You're wrong, you know it, and not you're trying to get a snarky last word in.
I can't see how this trifle is so important to you. You must have absolutely nothing going on.
degsme
Council Member
how many are caused by a stupid NRA driven STand Your Ground law....
oicu812
"Trust, but Verify"
do the police who are investigating this have this witnesses statement?
BRU
Mayor
after reading the law I think zimmerman will go down
776.041 Use of force by aggressor. —The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
"Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself"
So in my opinion, it's not the law that is the problem, its the Sandford PD not enforcing that law
776.041 Use of force by aggressor. —The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
"Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself"
So in my opinion, it's not the law that is the problem, its the Sandford PD not enforcing that law
