New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Virginia.....

Zam-Zam

Senator
Some unhappy news for Terry McAuliffe and his supporters:

Virginia Republicans look set to hold onto their Senate majority in the Old Dominion, amid aggressive campaigning by Democrat Gov. Terry McAuliffe.


It is a big defeat for McAuliffe, a close ally for Hillary Clinton, and a big defeat for New York billionaire Mike Bloomberg, who donated heavily to Democrats in the hope of winning the Virginia electoral fights on a promise of more gun-control.


Republicans beat back two serious challengers Tuesday, holding onto seats in the suburbs of Richmond and the Hampton Roads area.


In another hotly contested race, Republican Hal Parrish holds a lead over Democrat Jerry McPike. If Parrish holds onto his lead, it would represent a Republican gain, as the two are battling to replace a retiring Democrat.


McAuliffe, with considerable help from Bloomberg, bet his political capital on Democrats winning the upper Chamber. But he seems to have fallen far short.


Republicans currently hold a 2-seat majority in the state Senate. Republicans have an overwhelming majority in the state House.


Bloomberg was hoping to capitalize on the tragic shooting of two Virginia TV reporters by a disgruntled newsman earlier this Summer. He pumped millions into the race for two critical state Senate seats. As a result, both Democrats were able to dramatically outspend their Republican rivals.


Bloomberg and his SuperPAC, Everytown for Gun Safety, hoped to show that Democrats could win on the issue of gun control. Also, Gov. McAuliffe had made enacting new restrictions on gun ownership a centerpiece of his campaigning for Democrats around the state.


McAuliffe also campaigned aggressively for expanding Medicaid through ObamaCare and implementing universal preschool. All three issues have been top priorities for McAuliffe’s tenure as governor. Barred from running for reelection, McAuliffe will now face a united Republican legislature for his final two years in office.


His policy agenda, and Bloomberg’s push for gun control, are dead in Richmond. McAuliffe’s inability to deliver the closely divided Senate for Democrats also raises questions of how effective he can be for Hillary Clinton next year. In many ways, this legislative election turned on issues central to her campaign.



http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/03/bloomberg-mcauliffe-fail-take-virginia-senate/
 
I would agree that Virginia is gonna be tougher for Hillary to win than it was for Pres. Obama. Florida is still the key though and that is why the GOP nominee will be JEB or Rubio.
 
I would agree that Virginia is gonna be tougher for Hillary to win than it was for Pres. Obama. Florida is still the key though and that is why the GOP nominee will be JEB or Rubio.

Rubio. Jeb is toast. Due to all the exceedingly DUMB things he has said in the last year or so.
 
That quote right there sums up just how sick the left has become.


Actually, I think it is generally true of many politicians who see people suffering as an opportunity to exploit their fears. I'm not convinced one side or the other has a monopoly on this.
 
Why would you think I differ? Can't both be sick?

Let me put it this way: I think the shooting itself was FAR more 'sick' than how people reacted to it. In fact, I think it is VERY predictable that after a shooting like that (because it was captured on camera and posted on social media), or after any mass shooting, you are going to hear calls for more gun control----WHETHER OR NOT those calls make any sense.
 
Let me put it this way: I think the shooting itself was FAR more 'sick' than how people reacted to it. In fact, I think it is VERY predictable that after a shooting like that (because it was captured on camera and posted on social media), or after any mass shooting, you are going to hear calls for more gun control----WHETHER OR NOT those calls make any sense.

In this case, gun control was a minor consideration. This was Bloomberg using the murders of two people to try to get his friend elected. That's sick.
 
In this case, gun control was a minor consideration. This was Bloomberg using the murders of two people to try to get his friend elected. That's sick.

Because his friends---there were TWO of them---are supporters of gun control, and their opponents are against gun control. It is hardly a secret that Bloomberg favors stricter gun control. Shrug.
 
I would agree that Virginia is gonna be tougher for Hillary to win than it was for Pres. Obama. Florida is still the key though and that is why the GOP nominee will be JEB or Rubio.

And looking at the status of the Bush campaign (somehow ventilators, defib machines and such come to mind), Rubio emerges. From a pragmatic standpoint, it makes sense. Not only the Florida thing, but as a compromise between outside and establishment. Granted he's more establishment than outside. I think he's pretty articulate and otherwise speaks well. And again, being pragmatic, I think a Rubio/Kasich ticket would be extremely tough for the Democrats to campaign against. Kasich is pretty much a tough old war horse and his high approval in Ohio makes him absolutely DANGEROUS to the Democrat cause.
 
Because his friends---there were TWO of them---are supporters of gun control, and their opponents are against gun control. It is hardly a secret that Bloomberg favors stricter gun control. Shrug.
If only his last name was "Koch".

Then you could go on a lefty tirade against people peddling their influence in elections.
 
nra-300x300.png
 
of course being a liberal you agree libs should have used the deaths for votes.....

Being a liberal, I think that there should be free and open debate about how to reduce the overall level of violence in our society.

Being a far right wing conservative, you are opposed to that.
 
If only his last name was "Koch".

Then you could go on a lefty tirade against people peddling their influence in elections.

Actually, I think people should be free to criticize either the Koch brothers or Michael Bloomberg.

I'm pretty sure we used to call it 'freedom of speech'.

But maybe yer aginst Commienist idears like that. :cool:
 
Back
Top