New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

"We want to kill him DEAD!!!" Tsk tsk.... why are libs/dems so damn VIOLENT?

Barbella said:
Woodhouse is president of the left-leaning American Bridge, launched by Media Matters' David Brock. No surprise there...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...stie-want-to-kill-him-dead/?intcmp=latestnews
Click to expand...

Hypocrisy is something Leftists aim for. They hate warmongers, yet............ their go-to solution for anything local is violence.

You have to work hard to be that hypocritical.

I'm guessing it mostly revolves around hatred of anything other than themselves.
 
Barbella said:
Woodhouse is president of the left-leaning American Bridge, launched by Media Matters' David Brock. No surprise there...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/06/dem-strategist-on-christie-want-to-kill-him-dead/?intcmp=latestnews
Click to expand...

I thought the argument that Palin had put a bullseye on a political ad which stated they wanted to target someone and that was at the heart of the shooting that wounded Gabby Giffords, was silly.....Did you?

Isn't this the exact same thing?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...-putting-cross-hair-district-article-1.149099
 
marvin martian said:
The left wing death cult is steeped in violence...it's really the only language they know.
Click to expand...

Funny thing...the Nazis used the same kind of rhetoric against their enemies....The Jews...they only understand violence....First demonize your opponent. It really doesn't matter how silly the accusation...repeat it enough and it will work. Your citizens will easily accept any violence you want to use against them....
 
Barbella said:
Oh... Palin said she wants Giffords dead? Well, that was wrong... very wrong.
Click to expand...

They are both using political rhetoric that is non-pc for sure. Were either actually suggesting someone physically kill either Gifford or Christie? No. Is it possible some idiot might think they were....sure.
 
i thought threatening to kill an elected official was some sort of crime?

people have been arrested for tweets and facebook posts far more ambiguous than this.

as a declared presidential candidate, isn't he entitled to secret service investigation/intervention?
 
as seen on tv said:
i thought threatening to kill an elected official was some sort of crime?

people have been arrested for tweets and facebook posts far more ambiguous than this.

as a declared presidential candidate, isn't he entitled to secret service investigation/intervention?
Click to expand...

It's only a crime when a Republican does it. Democrats are different. :rolleyes:
 
middleview said:
They are both using political rhetoric that is non-pc for sure. Were either actually suggesting someone physically kill either Gifford or Christie? No. Is it possible some idiot might think they were....sure.
Click to expand...

Did Palin actually mention Giffords by name? Because, you know, that's what makes all the difference in the world, to sane people.
 
Barbella said:
Did Palin actually mention Giffords by name? Because, you know, that's what makes all the difference in the world, to sane people.
Click to expand...

1. You've seen that kind of rhetoric on both sides. Obama said something about punishing your enemies to an audience of Hispanic voters. Did he actually mean to physically assault them? No. Does that make the rhetoric acceptable? No.
2. Putting a bullseye on Gifford's district, along with other democratic districts is just as unacceptable. Do you remember the candidate who put Obama's picture on a target and his political ad had him shooting at it?

th
 
Last edited:
as seen on tv said:
i thought threatening to kill an elected official was some sort of crime?

people have been arrested for tweets and facebook posts far more ambiguous than this.

as a declared presidential candidate, isn't he entitled to secret service investigation/intervention?
Click to expand...

If the threat was made against a candidate then yes the secret service would investigate. I happen to have known two different guys who got visits from the secret service...one for a comment about Bush and one for Obama. Neither was prosecuted, but both were chastened by the experience. The guy who had threatened Obama did so in a VFW after a few beers and basically said he'd kick Obama's ass if he came to Denver for the convention in 2008....I heard he'd also claimed to have been a sniper in Nam and said he could easily pick Obama off from 500 yrds.....I wasn't around when he made the threat but I was when he sat at the bar and argued that his 1st amendment right to free speech had been violated....poor guy.
 
middleview said:
1. You've seen that kind of rhetoric on both sides. Obama said something about punishing your enemies to an audience of Hispanic voters. Did he actually mean to physically assault them? No. Does that make the rhetoric acceptable? No.
2. Putting a bullseye on Gifford's district, along with other democratic districts is just as unacceptable. Do you remember the candidate who put Obama's picture on a target and his political ad had him shooting at it?
Click to expand...

You mean like this:
IMG_2416small.JPG
saveearthkillbush.jpg

imheretokillbushsmall.jpg

You're talking about rhetoric... about unnamed 'enemies' and 'districts'. I'm talking about actually naming a person and wanting to kill him. Apples and oranges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top