Mytzlplk
Governor
while I'm extremely disappointed in the lack of aggressiveness from BHO, most of it stems from the lack of truthfullness from Mutt. How do you deal with someone who runs on this and that, and then denies it? With a LIAR!LIAR!
I think I'd be issuing an ad soon comparing and contrasting what he said in the debate with what has been on the public record for some time, and take it outta the media's hands. It appears to me in the analysis of many talking heads, integrity is taking a back seat to a lack of bloodletting. Take your pick http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2...ss-liveblog-of-the-first-presidential-debate/ It would be rather sad if they allowed his deceptions to be rewarded, wouldn't it? Perhaps they've forgotten their role in educating the electorate, much as Mutt has with his intended plans to undermine public education in this country. Oh that's right, that assumes a dedicated, in-the-tank-for-BHO, "liberal" media is what we're talking about here, as opposed to a corporate media that feeds the horses in this case, and needs a reason not to bury one of them already. I had also predicted BHO would take it outta their hands, but sadly he didn't, at least so far. But hey, tomorrow is another day.
Who knows, that coulda been BHO's plan all along -- a "give him the rope" effort -- since from the Obama's team pov, the only thing that was predictable was the likelihood of Mutt lying in fact and by omission. I feel the same pain from the lack of humiliation he shoulda recieved for such, but at least the rightwinger racists were deprived of any "angry black guy" moments. Planting that seed coulda well been the reason for that criminally stupid effort so many assisted with by spreading the drudge sludge yesterday.
SO while it wasn't the kinda ass kicking I predicted and would have preferred, it was certainly adequate in establishing the important diffs between the two, and the continued vagueness of Mutt's plans, which really shouldn't be characterized as such, since they obviously change in pres debates like they do on the road.
"c" y'all
I think I'd be issuing an ad soon comparing and contrasting what he said in the debate with what has been on the public record for some time, and take it outta the media's hands. It appears to me in the analysis of many talking heads, integrity is taking a back seat to a lack of bloodletting. Take your pick http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2...ss-liveblog-of-the-first-presidential-debate/ It would be rather sad if they allowed his deceptions to be rewarded, wouldn't it? Perhaps they've forgotten their role in educating the electorate, much as Mutt has with his intended plans to undermine public education in this country. Oh that's right, that assumes a dedicated, in-the-tank-for-BHO, "liberal" media is what we're talking about here, as opposed to a corporate media that feeds the horses in this case, and needs a reason not to bury one of them already. I had also predicted BHO would take it outta their hands, but sadly he didn't, at least so far. But hey, tomorrow is another day.
Who knows, that coulda been BHO's plan all along -- a "give him the rope" effort -- since from the Obama's team pov, the only thing that was predictable was the likelihood of Mutt lying in fact and by omission. I feel the same pain from the lack of humiliation he shoulda recieved for such, but at least the rightwinger racists were deprived of any "angry black guy" moments. Planting that seed coulda well been the reason for that criminally stupid effort so many assisted with by spreading the drudge sludge yesterday.
SO while it wasn't the kinda ass kicking I predicted and would have preferred, it was certainly adequate in establishing the important diffs between the two, and the continued vagueness of Mutt's plans, which really shouldn't be characterized as such, since they obviously change in pres debates like they do on the road.
"c" y'all
