New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Well...well... Look who is next in line to replace Boehner

Spamature said:
When you consider the way TrumpZilla rose to the become leader to the GOP. Is it any surprise America now faces this prospect.

Report: Scalise’s Pitch 20 Years Ago: I’m ‘David Duke Without The Baggage’


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...tch-20-years-ago-im-david-duke-without-the-baggage/

Looks as if the rest of sane America will have a reason to cry right along with his Orangeness on his last day as Speaker.
Click to expand...

I have a feeling the next Speaker will hold the title for just 18 months or so.
Congress is already despised. Being more obstinate isn't likely to help them.
 
Craig said:
I have a feeling the next Speaker will hold the title for just 18 months or so.
Congress is already despised. Being more obstinate isn't likely to help them.
Click to expand...
I really is a crazy time in that party and you can only hope it doesn't spread to everything else. Because frankly David Duke's political agenda would fit right in with that of today's GOP.
 
Spamature said:
I really is a crazy time in that party and you can only hope it doesn't spread to everything else. Because frankly David Duke's political agenda would fit right in with that of today's GOP.
Click to expand...

David Duke is going to be Speaker? Wow.

By the way, bogus links are never a plus.
 
Craig said:
I have a feeling the next Speaker will hold the title for just 18 months or so.
Congress is already despised. Being more obstinate isn't likely to help them.
Click to expand...
Agreed. The time is ripe for a Republican President and a Democratic Congress because the American public is sick and tired of the bullshit from both sides. Their only option? Throw the bums out and vote in opposing parties.
 
Max R. said:
Agreed. The time is ripe for a Republican President and a Democratic Congress because the American public is sick and tired of the bullshit from both sides. Their only option? Throw the bums out and vote in opposing parties.
Click to expand...

I suspect Republicans will take the White House in 2016, show America they can't be trusted, then lose the House and/or the Senate to Democrats in 2018.

The fact that Democrats are still talking about candidates they want to run (i.e. Bloomberg, Schultz, Biden etc) show they're not happy with their options and probably realize their prospects aren't good. And with the weight of 8 years of Obama around their necks, they're right.
 
The Thinker said:
I suspect Republicans will take the White House in 2016, show America they can't be trusted, then lose the House and/or the Senate to Democrats in 2018.

The fact that Democrats are still talking about candidates they want to run (i.e. Bloomberg, Schultz, Biden etc) show they're not happy with their options and probably realize their prospects aren't good. And with the weight of 8 years of Obama around their necks, they're right.
Click to expand...

Take the White House with who ? Certainly you don't think any of your current front runners has a chance at that job ?

Also its the GOP who is dissatisfied with their current representation . Don't try to put right wing anger and resentment on the Dems. They voted Obama back in office when times were worse than they are now. Nor are they looking to TV celebrities to fulfill their need for a candidate for the WH.
 
Spamature said:
I really is a crazy time in that party and you can only hope it doesn't spread to everything else. Because frankly David Duke's political agenda would fit right in with that of today's GOP.
Click to expand...

David Duke the democratic Presidential candidate? How funny..he started his Klan when he was a democrat...how funny...
 
Spamature said:
Take the White House with who ? .....
Click to expand...
Why don't you start another "Trumpzilla" thread? He's the one your afraid of, right?

I think Fiorina or Carson have a decent chance, but it's still too early to tell. Give it another 5 months.
 
Spamature said:
Take the White House with who ? Certainly you don't think any of your current front runners has a chance at that job ?

Also its the GOP who is dissatisfied with their current representation . Don't try to put right wing anger and resentment on the Dems. They voted Obama back in office when times were worse than they are now. Nor are they looking to TV celebrities to fulfill their need for a candidate for the WH.
Click to expand...

Take the White House with a Republican. Duh.

Now as to the rest of your nonsense. Of course Republicans are dissatisfied with their current representation, Captain Obvious.

However, your subject change won't inoculate you from the reality I posted. Democrats aren't happy with the current candidates. Why else would they be looking to Joe Biden? Why else would Bloomberg and Schultz be mentioned if not for dissatisfaction with the current field? Oh and notice they're all old white people on the Democrat side? But let's let that slide for now.

Now as to your television celebrities meme. Trump's net worth is about $8 billion. He claims to have made about $200 million off television. Let's do the math, shall we? He made 2.5% of his vast fortune on TV. So your attempt to portray him as a "television celebrity" is specious at best, though in your specific case just plain dishonest.

But let's get back to Democrat prospects for 2016. Barack Obama's approval numbers are underwater in every category. Economic growth is tepid at best, about 2.3% so far this year. I know that you love to do all kinds of cheerleading routines trying to tell everyone how great things are, but AMERICA IS NOT FEELING YOUR JOY. Frankly, I'm glad you and your fellow drones haven't figured that out. The downside for you is you'll be shocked on election day.

Now see if you can address the facts about Democrats, dissatisfaction and the 2016 without your usual obsessing over Donald Trump.

I'm not optimistic you can do it, but will gladly keep taking you to the wood shed for a thorough pummeling with the facts.
 
Max R. said:
Why don't you start another "Trumpzilla" thread? He's the one your afraid of, right?

I think Fiorina or Carson have a decent chance, but it's still too early to tell. Give it another 5 months.
Click to expand...

No they do not have a decent chance. They have a snowball in hell's chance.
 
Spamature said:
A man who calls himself "David Duke without the baggage" is first in line to become speaker. I did not David Duke would become speaker.
Click to expand...

You have nothing but a bogus link to back up your assertion. Thanks, but I'll assume you're being dishonest (as usual) until I read a full context article. You are just too much of a liar to have your word accepted, especially when you've tried to make it with a bogus link that goes nowhere.
 
The Thinker said:
Take the White House with a Republican. Duh.

Now as to the rest of your nonsense. Of course Republicans are dissatisfied with their current representation, Captain Obvious.

However, your subject change won't inoculate you from the reality I posted. Democrats aren't happy with the current candidates. Why else would they be looking to Joe Biden? Why else would Bloomberg and Schultz be mentioned if not for dissatisfaction with the current field? Oh and notice they're all old white people on the Democrat side? But let's let that slide for now.

Now as to your television celebrities meme. Trump's net worth is about $8 billion. He claims to have made about $200 million off television. Let's do the math, shall we? He made 2.5% of his vast fortune on TV. So your attempt to portray him as a "television celebrity" is specious at best, though in your specific case just plain dishonest.

But let's get back to Democrat prospects for 2016. Barack Obama's approval numbers are underwater in every category. Economic growth is tepid at best, about 2.3% so far this year. I know that you love to do all kinds of cheerleading routines trying to tell everyone how great things are, but AMERICA IS NOT FEELING YOUR JOY. Frankly, I'm glad you and your fellow drones haven't figured that out. The downside for you is you'll be shocked on election day.

Now see if you can address the facts about Democrats, dissatisfaction and the 2016 without your usual obsessing over Donald Trump.

I'm not optimistic you can do it, but will gladly keep taking you to the wood shed for a thorough pummeling with the facts.
Click to expand...

You can blather all you want to about Obama stats. They were worse than they are now and Dems backed him to the hilt. You cons are the ones who are whining about your leaders not Dems. Biden is still a leader of the party. So at best your argument is that we are only choosing between leaders within our party. Not some celebrity outsiders like the Repubgs
 
Spamature said:
You can blather all you want to about Obama stats. They were worse than they are now and Dems backed him to the hilt. You cons are the ones who are whining about your leaders not Dems. Biden is still a leader of the party. So at best your argument is that we are only choosing between leaders within our party. Not some celebrity outsiders like the Repubgs
Click to expand...

None of that addresses the discontent Democrats have for your current 2016 options. Obviously you realize you can't present an argument that will get you anywhere.

And once again, your obsession with Donald Trump is noted.

Now do you have anything substantive to rebut with?

Didn't think so.

You're dismissed.
 
The Thinker said:
You have nothing but a bogus link to back up your assertion. Thanks, but I'll assume you're being dishonest (as usual) until I read a full context article. You are just too much of a liar to have your word accepted, especially when you've tried to make it with a bogus link that goes nowhere.
Click to expand...

Google David Duke without the baggage and you will see it is not bogus. It is the man who is 1st in line to become the GOP speaker of the house.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top