What happened?

[PhilFish]

Once again. For everybody to digest. It is roughly the same four, sometimes 5, sometimes 6 posters from both sides that are banned repeatedly, and consistently because of their behaviors not the moderators were the administrators behaviors.

Not a plot. Not a left vs right. Not a right vs left.

The same posters with the same behaviors.

That is who is ruining it for all the other posters.

Everything else is of fiction, made up by each side against the other.

Meanwhile the site continues to average between 600 and 700 posts a day, day in and day out, month-over-month, year after year.

 

[SW48]

Once again. For everybody to digest. It is roughly the same four, sometimes 5, sometimes 6 posters from both sides that are banned repeatedly, and consistently because of their behaviors not the moderators were the administrators behaviors.

Not a plot. Not a left vs right. Not a right vs left.

The same posters with the same behaviors.

That is who is ruining it for all the other posters.

Everything else is of fiction, made up by each side against the other.

Meanwhile the site continues to average between 600 and 700 posts a day, day in and day out, month-over-month, year after year.

Can you send me those 5 or 6 posters so we can tighten the screws and get this cleaned up?

 

[PhilFish]

And if your discomforted by some unseen person on a political website giving you a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down a , or some other rating, then maybe you're the one with the problem and all to have that looked at

 

[PhilFish]

Can you send me those 5 or 6 posters so we can tighten the screws and get this cleaned up?

You know who they are. It's the same list we always share

 

[PhilFish]

Can you send me those 5 or 6 posters so we can tighten the screws and get this cleaned up?

I placed it on the admin page all the same

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

The right really isn’t capable of following rules. They are too angry and miserable. So they get themselves suspended. Not all, but many. It is what it is.

leftist can follow the rules when the goal post is moved

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

I placed it on the admin page all the same

I was the first one on that list of offenders that was started I was banned for calling someone a racist.
Who did I call a racist? Who was the post made to?

 

[PhilFish]

I was the first one on that list of offenders that was started I was banned for calling someone a racist.
Who did I call a racist? Who was the post made to?

Sorry...I don't know

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Sorry...I don't know

You do know I was the first on the list of offenders correct?

 

[PhilFish]

You do know I was the first on the list of offenders correct?

I don't. At least on my list you aren't

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

I don't. At least on my list you aren't

The thread that was started of the list of offenders
I was the very first one lol

 

[PhilFish]

The thread that was started of the list of offenders
I was the very first one lol

Don't remember..

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Don't remember..

The problem was I never directly called anyone a racist I mentioned the word racist.

 

[PhilFish]

The problem was I never directly called anyone a racist I mentioned the word racist.

Honestly. Not trying to be a assh. I don't recall

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Honestly. Not trying to be a assh. I don't recall

I understand that just correcting the mistake that was directed at me and how abusive that rule has become.

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

And if your discomforted by some unseen person on a political website giving you a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down a , or some other rating, then maybe you're the one with the problem and all to have that looked at

Why don't you tell that to SW who just banned The Thinker for the second time since these new rules were implemented for ratings abuse.

Seems you two aren't on the same page.

 

[PhilFish]

I understand that just correcting the mistake that was directed at me and how abusive that rule has become.

Nothing abusive about it. Maybe in your case a one off error. Can't say. It's not as though an abusive application exists considering the number if such instances. Which are few.

 

[PhilFish]

Why don't you tell that to SW who just banned The Thinker for the second time since these new rules were implemented for ratings abuse.

Seems you two aren't on the same page.

Huh?

Yes. Thinker was banned for ratings abuse. Maybe thinker ought not abuse ratings.

?

 

[Constitutional Sheepdog]

Nothing abusive about it. Maybe in your case a one off error. Can't say. It's not as though an abusive application exists considering the number if such instances. Which are few.

My mistake I wasn't suggesting that it was an abusive rule I said it could become abusive as with my case.
I did say has become though I meant to say could become.

 

[PhilFish]

My mistake I wasn't suggesting that it was an abusive rule I said it could become abusive as with my case.

How many times have you been banned for calling someone a racist?