New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

When America Interfered in a Russian Election

AIL

Jet fuel that's a good one.
If you are truly a free open society there should be no corporate owned news media! The news media has to be the voice of the people and to protect the people interests above corporate agendas .. All corporate news media should force to sell its shares to the general pubic and public money should be given to the news media to support truly independent reporting so as
not be a source for PROFIT..


No out cry about America's directly interfering in Russian elections .. But still no proof of Russian interference in USA election. So shut the Furk up about Russian interference in USA elections its all bullshit!!!! What come out of the election was the true nature of Hillary Clinton that facts come out ..An in insider leaked the DNC server and Hillary emails. That was good for one reason American found out the UGLY TRUTH about the DNC and how they sabotaged Bernie.. If that was not done Bernie would have been the nominee and trump would have LOST..



When America Interfered in a Russian Election


By Margaret Kimberley

“All of the news is fake when corporate media connive with the powerful to produce their desired ends.”

March 16, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - "There is still no evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. What substitutes for proof is nothing but an endless loop of corporate media repetition. The Democratic Party has plenty of reason to whip up hysteria in an effort to divert attention from its endless electoral debacles.

What no one mentions is that the United States government has a very long history of interfering in elections around the world. Since World War II American presidents have used electoral dirty tricks, fraud and violence to upend the will of people in Italy, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam and Honduras to name but a few nations. If possible brute force and murder are used to depose elected leaders as in Haiti and Chile.

Amid all the hoopla about Russia’s supposed influence in the election or with Donald Trump directly, there is little mention of a successful American effort to intervene in that country. In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.

There is no need for conjecture in this case. The story was discussed quite openly at the time and included a Time magazine cover story with the guilty parties going on record about their role in subverting democracy.

“In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.”

Polls showed that Yeltsin was in danger of losing to the Communist Party candidate Gennadi Zhuganov. The collapse of the Soviet Union had created an economic and political catastrophe for the Russian people. Oligarchs openly stole public funds while government workers went without pay. Russians lost the safety net they had enjoyed and the disaster resulted in a precipitous decline in life expectancy and birth rates.

The United States didn’t care about the suffering of ordinary Russians. Its only concern was making sure that the once socialist country never turned in that direction again. When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.


Clinton had an even more direct involvement. Led by a team connected to his adviser Dick Morris, a group of political consultants went to work in Moscow, but kept their existence a secret. One of the conspirators put the case succinctly. "Everyone realized that if the Communists knew about this before the election, they would attack Yeltsin as an American tool.” Of course Yeltsin was an American tool, and that was precisely the desired outcome.

The Time magazine article wasn’t the only corporate media expose of the American power grab. The story was also made into a film called “Spinning Boris.” One would think that this well known and documented account would be brought to attention now, but just the opposite has happened. The tale of Clinton administration conniving has instead been disappeared down the memory hole as if it never took place.

“When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.”

The supposedly free media in this country march in lock step with presidents. After Obama and his secretary of state Hillary Clinton made Russia bashing a national pastime the media followed suit. The reason for the hostility is very simple. Russia is an enormous country spanning Europe and Asia and has huge amounts of energy resources which European countries depend on. Its gas and oil reserves make it a player and therefore a target for sanctions and war by other means.

more here http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46669.htm
 
I don't think nations endorsing an IMF loan to a nation rises to the level of "election manipulation". IMF makes loans to various nations all the time.

however, if the US had somehow undertaking unilateral action to prevent a nation from getting a loan, with the concept of destabilizing a duly elected government, you'd have more of case.

as it is, you have no case it all.
 
So you're proposing state-run media? How in the hell is that any better than privately owned media? The media has ALWAYS had a slant. Why would you trade private news sources, from which you can pick and choose, for government media from which you can't?
 
If you are truly a free open society there should be no corporate owned news media! The news media has to be the voice of the people and to protect the people interests above corporate agendas .. All corporate news media should force to sell its shares to the general pubic and public money should be given to the news media to support truly independent reporting so as
not be a source for PROFIT..


No out cry about America's directly interfering in Russian elections .. But still no proof of Russian interference in USA election. So shut the Furk up about Russian interference in USA elections its all bullshit!!!! What come out of the election was the true nature of Hillary Clinton that facts come out ..An in insider leaked the DNC server and Hillary emails. That was good for one reason American found out the UGLY TRUTH about the DNC and how they sabotaged Bernie.. If that was not done Bernie would have been the nominee and trump would have LOST..



When America Interfered in a Russian Election


By Margaret Kimberley

“All of the news is fake when corporate media connive with the powerful to produce their desired ends.”

March 16, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - "There is still no evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. What substitutes for proof is nothing but an endless loop of corporate media repetition. The Democratic Party has plenty of reason to whip up hysteria in an effort to divert attention from its endless electoral debacles.

What no one mentions is that the United States government has a very long history of interfering in elections around the world. Since World War II American presidents have used electoral dirty tricks, fraud and violence to upend the will of people in Italy, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam and Honduras to name but a few nations. If possible brute force and murder are used to depose elected leaders as in Haiti and Chile.

Amid all the hoopla about Russia’s supposed influence in the election or with Donald Trump directly, there is little mention of a successful American effort to intervene in that country. In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.

There is no need for conjecture in this case. The story was discussed quite openly at the time and included a Time magazine cover story with the guilty parties going on record about their role in subverting democracy.

“In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.”

Polls showed that Yeltsin was in danger of losing to the Communist Party candidate Gennadi Zhuganov. The collapse of the Soviet Union had created an economic and political catastrophe for the Russian people. Oligarchs openly stole public funds while government workers went without pay. Russians lost the safety net they had enjoyed and the disaster resulted in a precipitous decline in life expectancy and birth rates.

The United States didn’t care about the suffering of ordinary Russians. Its only concern was making sure that the once socialist country never turned in that direction again. When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.


Clinton had an even more direct involvement. Led by a team connected to his adviser Dick Morris, a group of political consultants went to work in Moscow, but kept their existence a secret. One of the conspirators put the case succinctly. "Everyone realized that if the Communists knew about this before the election, they would attack Yeltsin as an American tool.” Of course Yeltsin was an American tool, and that was precisely the desired outcome.

The Time magazine article wasn’t the only corporate media expose of the American power grab. The story was also made into a film called “Spinning Boris.” One would think that this well known and documented account would be brought to attention now, but just the opposite has happened. The tale of Clinton administration conniving has instead been disappeared down the memory hole as if it never took place.

“When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.”

The supposedly free media in this country march in lock step with presidents. After Obama and his secretary of state Hillary Clinton made Russia bashing a national pastime the media followed suit. The reason for the hostility is very simple. Russia is an enormous country spanning Europe and Asia and has huge amounts of energy resources which European countries depend on. Its gas and oil reserves make it a player and therefore a target for sanctions and war by other means.

more here http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46669.htm

Clinton had an even more direct involvement. Led by a team connected to his adviser Dick Morris, a group of political consultants went to work in Moscow, but kept their existence a secret. One of the conspirators put the case succinctly. "Everyone realized that if the Communists knew about this before the election, they would attack Yeltsin as an American tool.” Of course Yeltsin was an American tool, and that was precisely the desired outcome.

How does this indicate direct involvement by Clinton? Clinton fired Dick Morris in 1996 for letting a hooker listen in on their conversations....remember? Morris may well have had other consultants working for his company. They also may have been employed by Yeltsin. Where is the evidence that Clinton was involved?
 
So you're proposing state-run media? How in the hell is that any better than privately owned media? The media has ALWAYS had a slant. Why would you trade private news sources, from which you can pick and choose, for government media from which you can't?
Private news is just that in the interest of private elites not meant for the benefit of the general public ..I propose a combination of public ownership and some government support because investigative news is is expensive...

far better that the warmongering corporate owners you have had.. Look at the results most of your war were all BASED on MSM LIES.
 
Private news is just that in the interest of private elites not meant for the benefit of the general public ..I propose a combination of public ownership and some government support because investigative news is is expensive...

far better that the warmongering corporate owners you have had.. Look at the results most of your war were all BASED on MSM LIES.

What the government supports is what the government censors.
I cannot think of a single state run media that I trust.
 
Private news is just that in the interest of private elites not meant for the benefit of the general public ..I propose a combination of public ownership and some government support because investigative news is is expensive...

far better that the warmongering corporate owners you have had.. Look at the results most of your war were all BASED on MSM LIES.

Sure thing...like RT or Sputnik? Are they more to your liking?
 
In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.”
This was about the time Trump's six bankruptcies made it impossible for him to get anymore loans from Wall Street; luckily a lot of newly rich Russian gangsters needed their money laundered?

http://www.the-american-interest.co...of-donald-trumps-private-russian-connections/

"There was also an important intervention in Russian politics. In January 1996 a secret team of professional U.S. political consultants arrived in Moscow to discover that, as CNN put it back then, 'The only thing voters like less than Boris Yeltsin is the prospect of upheaval.'

"The experts’ solution was one of earliest “Our brand is crisis” campaign strategies, in which Yeltsin was 'spun' as the only alternative to 'chaos.' To support him, in March 1996 the IMF also pitched in with $10.1 billion of new loans, on top of $17.3 billion of IMF/World Bank loans that had already been made.

"With all this outside help, plus ample contributions from Russia’s new elite, Yeltsin went from just 8 percent approval in the January 1996 polls to a 54-41 percent victory over the Communist Party candidate, Gennady Zyuganov, in the second round of the July 1996 election. At the time, mainstream media like Time and the New York Times were delighted. Very few outside Russia questioned the wisdom of this blatant intervention in post-Soviet Russia’s first democratic election, or the West’s right to do it in order to protect itself."
 
This was about the time Trump's six bankruptcies made it impossible for him to get anymore loans from Wall Street; luckily a lot of newly rich Russian gangsters needed their money laundered?

http://www.the-american-interest.co...of-donald-trumps-private-russian-connections/

"There was also an important intervention in Russian politics. In January 1996 a secret team of professional U.S. political consultants arrived in Moscow to discover that, as CNN put it back then, 'The only thing voters like less than Boris Yeltsin is the prospect of upheaval.'

"The experts’ solution was one of earliest “Our brand is crisis” campaign strategies, in which Yeltsin was 'spun' as the only alternative to 'chaos.' To support him, in March 1996 the IMF also pitched in with $10.1 billion of new loans, on top of $17.3 billion of IMF/World Bank loans that had already been made.

"With all this outside help, plus ample contributions from Russia’s new elite, Yeltsin went from just 8 percent approval in the January 1996 polls to a 54-41 percent victory over the Communist Party candidate, Gennady Zyuganov, in the second round of the July 1996 election. At the time, mainstream media like Time and the New York Times were delighted. Very few outside Russia questioned the wisdom of this blatant intervention in post-Soviet Russia’s first democratic election, or the West’s right to do it in order to protect itself."

If you are truly a free open society there should be no corporate owned news media! The news media has to be the voice of the people and to protect the people interests above corporate agendas .. All corporate news media should force to sell its shares to the general pubic and public money should be given to the news media to support truly independent reporting so as
not be a source for PROFIT..


No out cry about America's directly interfering in Russian elections .. But still no proof of Russian interference in USA election. So shut the Furk up about Russian interference in USA elections its all bullshit!!!! What come out of the election was the true nature of Hillary Clinton that facts come out ..An in insider leaked the DNC server and Hillary emails. That was good for one reason American found out the UGLY TRUTH about the DNC and how they sabotaged Bernie.. If that was not done Bernie would have been the nominee and trump would have LOST..



When America Interfered in a Russian Election


By Margaret Kimberley

“All of the news is fake when corporate media connive with the powerful to produce their desired ends.”

March 16, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - "There is still no evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. What substitutes for proof is nothing but an endless loop of corporate media repetition. The Democratic Party has plenty of reason to whip up hysteria in an effort to divert attention from its endless electoral debacles.

What no one mentions is that the United States government has a very long history of interfering in elections around the world. Since World War II American presidents have used electoral dirty tricks, fraud and violence to upend the will of people in Italy, Iran, Guatemala, Vietnam and Honduras to name but a few nations. If possible brute force and murder are used to depose elected leaders as in Haiti and Chile.

Amid all the hoopla about Russia’s supposed influence in the election or with Donald Trump directly, there is little mention of a successful American effort to intervene in that country. In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.

There is no need for conjecture in this case. The story was discussed quite openly at the time and included a Time magazine cover story with the guilty parties going on record about their role in subverting democracy.

“In 1996 American political consultants and the Bill Clinton administration made certain that Boris Yeltsin remained in the Russian presidency.”

Polls showed that Yeltsin was in danger of losing to the Communist Party candidate Gennadi Zhuganov. The collapse of the Soviet Union had created an economic and political catastrophe for the Russian people. Oligarchs openly stole public funds while government workers went without pay. Russians lost the safety net they had enjoyed and the disaster resulted in a precipitous decline in life expectancy and birth rates.

The United States didn’t care about the suffering of ordinary Russians. Its only concern was making sure that the once socialist country never turned in that direction again. When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.


Clinton had an even more direct involvement. Led by a team connected to his adviser Dick Morris, a group of political consultants went to work in Moscow, but kept their existence a secret. One of the conspirators put the case succinctly. "Everyone realized that if the Communists knew about this before the election, they would attack Yeltsin as an American tool.” Of course Yeltsin was an American tool, and that was precisely the desired outcome.

The Time magazine article wasn’t the only corporate media expose of the American power grab. The story was also made into a film called “Spinning Boris.” One would think that this well known and documented account would be brought to attention now, but just the opposite has happened. The tale of Clinton administration conniving has instead been disappeared down the memory hole as if it never took place.

“When Yeltsin looked like a loser the Clinton administration pressed the International Monetary Fund to send quick cash and bolster Yeltsin’s government with a $10 billion loan.”

The supposedly free media in this country march in lock step with presidents. After Obama and his secretary of state Hillary Clinton made Russia bashing a national pastime the media followed suit. The reason for the hostility is very simple. Russia is an enormous country spanning Europe and Asia and has huge amounts of energy resources which European countries depend on. Its gas and oil reserves make it a player and therefore a target for sanctions and war by other means.

more here http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46669.htm


Looks like the real Russian puppets are Billy and Hilly.
 
Looks like the real Russian puppets are Billy and Hilly.
Bill and Hill are long gone.
Donald will always owe Dmitry.

515-County-Road-Dmitry-Rybolovlev.jpg

http://therealnews.com/t2/story:18653:Did-Russian-Oligarch-Rybolovlev-Bailout-Trump-in-2008?

"In his report, James Henry reveals that fascinating connection exists between Dmitry Rybolovlev and Donald Trump..."

"But along comes Rybolovlev in June of 2008 and plunks down $95 million – plus probably a commission – for a property that Donald Trump had paid just $41 million for back in 2004. That was really convenient for Trump, because precisely at that time all of his properties, projects, were in trouble, and one in Chicago in particular was.

"He was facing a $40 million personal loan guarantee that he had made with Deutsche Bank. And he ended up suing Deutsche Bank, charging them with responsibility for the financial crisis, and trying to get out of paying that loan in September of 2008.

"So, this $40 million profit he makes on his Florida property is just perfect timing from his standpoint.


"And it's really strange because at that time everyone else was withdrawing.

"Subsequently, the property continued to decline in value. The Palm Beach County appraised it at about $60 million in 2013. And Rybolovlev recently sold off a third of the property at a pro rata sale at a substantial discount from what he paid for it back in 2008."
 
Back
Top