New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Where the hell is the so-called "Iraqi army"?

Bugsy McGurk

Bugsy McGurk

President
We spent hundreds of BILLIONS supposedly to train an Iraqi army to replace the one GWB disbanded, and they are nowhere to be seen as ISIS occupies much of Iraq and slaughters Iraqi civilians.

Sure looks like that money was pissed away, no?
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
We spent hundreds of BILLIONS supposedly to train an Iraqi army to replace the one GWB disbanded, and they are nowhere to be seen as ISIS occupies much of Iraq and slaughters Iraqi civilians.

Sure looks like that money was pissed away, no?
Click to expand...

You destroyed the Army - And have not delivered the weapons needed - all paid for in full.

They have no weapons to fight with America - why won't you deliver those they have bought from you?

Russia has offered them weapons now - maybe this is the proxi US vs Russian War about to kick off because ISIS/L is your proxi military -
 
Last edited:
Bugsy McGurk said:
We spent hundreds of BILLIONS supposedly to train an Iraqi army to replace the one GWB disbanded, and they are nowhere to be seen as ISIS occupies much of Iraq and slaughters Iraqi civilians.

Sure looks like that money was pissed away, no?
Click to expand...
obama order no weapons left behind,:rolleyes:
I find it hilarious that you praise obama for ending the Iraq war, when that became a failure you said it was Bush's fault, now this is also Bushes Fault? Sooner or latter you have to let your boy grown up and stop defending his mistakes by blaming Buooooooooooosh.
 
the GWB army turned its weapons over to ISIS when attacked. ISIS is (mostly) the "hard core" sunni republican guards employed by Saddam, which was disbanded after their defeat. They of course now have new, radicalized leadership. These are not some ragtag civilian mob given guns and told to go nuts - these are the same guys who were trained under and fought for saddam, and they're mad as hell at the shi'ites for sticking it to them after saddam was deposed.
 
Constitutional Sheepdog said:
obama order no weapons left behind,:rolleyes:
I find it hilarious that you praise obama for ending the Iraq war, when that became a failure you said it was Bush's fault, now this is also Bushes Fault? Sooner or latter you have to let your boy grown up and stop defending his mistakes by blaming Buooooooooooosh.
Click to expand...

No weapons were left behind?

Which GOP propaganda minister stuffed that lie into your head?
 
as seen on tv said:
the GWB army turned its weapons over to ISIS when attacked. ISIS is (mostly) the "hard core" sunni republican guards employed by Saddam, which was disbanded after their defeat. They of course now have new, radicalized leadership. These are not some ragtag civilian mob given guns and told to go nuts - these are the same guys who were trained under and fought for saddam, and they're mad as hell at the shi'ites for sticking it to them after saddam was deposed.
Click to expand...

Hundreds of billions of US dollars (all borrowed through deficit spending) flushed down the toilet.

And yet some STILL defend GWB's Iraq war.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
We spent hundreds of BILLIONS supposedly to train an Iraqi army to replace the one GWB disbanded, and they are nowhere to be seen as ISIS occupies much of Iraq and slaughters Iraqi civilians.

Sure looks like that money was pissed away, no?
Click to expand...

Invading Iraq has to be the largest foreign policy blunder this nation has ever committed.

Can you think of a worse one?
 
BitterPill said:
Invading Iraq has to be the largest foreign policy blunder this nation has ever committed.

Can you think of a worse one?
Click to expand...

You missed the point of the original invaision ... it was never about freedom or rights for oppressed people or anything of that sort. It was always a banker's war. It still is one. Obama is no different than Bush when it comes to being a servant of the Global Banking cartel. They had different skin color and different party affiliations but they had the same bosses. The invasion was a spectacular success for the Petro-dollar and did everything it was supposed to do in that regard.

The propaganda part of the War showed unfinished goals, messy politics and a lack of a withdrawal plan....none of that stuff was ever important to the central theme of that war that's why it recieved little to no real attention. Weapons missing? Who cares? The right CEO's were paid handsomely for those supplies .... It was all very, very successful. There were no failures of the original intent in that paritcular war. The only failure was the gullbility of the American people who actually thought that freedom fighiting was taking place. That was the real joke.

Time to wake up there Britsh Petroleum!
 
Last edited:
Queen Titania said:
You destroyed the Army - And have not delivered the weapons needed - all paid for in full.

They have no weapons to fight with America - why won't you deliver those they have bought from you?

Russia has offered them weapons now - maybe this is the proxi US vs Russian War about to kick off because ISIS/L is your proxi military -
Click to expand...

We gave the Iraqis plenty of weapons--too many. Now a lot of them belong to ISIS.

And about ISIS being our proxy, do you even know what a proxy is?

If we have a proxy, it would be the Kurds though there is a chance we'll eventually cooperate to some extent with Iran, though who would be the proxy in that relationship escapes me.
 
BitterPill said:
Invading Iraq has to be the largest foreign policy blunder this nation has ever committed.

Can you think of a worse one?
Click to expand...

I cannot.

I think it was the worst foreign policy blunder ever, and nothing else comes close.

That's why Pugs insanely try to blame it on Obama.

;-)
 
justoffal said:
You missed the point of the original invaision ... it was never about freedom or rights for oppressed people or anything of that sort. It was always a banker's war. It still is one. Obama is no different than Bush when it comes to being a servant of the Global Banking cartel. They had different skin color and different party affiliations but they had the same boss.

Time to wake up there Britsh Petroleum!
Click to expand...

Obama opposed the war, and GWB supported it, but they are both "the same."

Classic!

;-)
 
justoffal said:
You missed the point of the original invaision ... it was never about freedom or rights for oppressed people or anything of that sort. It was always a banker's war. It still is one. Obama is no different than Bush when it comes to being a servant of the Global Banking cartel. They had different skin color and different party affiliations but they had the same boss.

Time to wake up there Britsh Petroleum!
Click to expand...

I am well aware the war wasn't about freedom or rights for oppressed people. It wasn't about WMD's or a Saddam/9-11 connection, either. It was about oil. Naturally, where there is oil there are bankers like flies around a sewage pit, but I'd need evidence to blame the bankers instead of the oil or the flies instead of the sewage.
 
BitterPill said:
I am well aware the war wasn't about freedom or rights for oppressed people. It wasn't about WMD's or a Saddam/9-11 connection, either. It was about oil. Naturally, where there is oil there are bankers like flies around a sewage pit, but I'd need evidence to blame the bankers instead of the oil or the flies instead of the sewage.
Click to expand...

And the oilmen sure got lucky - the prez and Veep were both fellow oilmen.

Not luck really - oil money got them installed - but you know what I mean.

;-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top