New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

why is it

Judy1

Judy1

Mayor
that conservatives claiming to be for small government, ie less taxes, less regulation and less spending are the same ones who are all for the government getting involved in ones personal business? How do they reconcile this?
 
Do you mean preserving the lives of innocent intentionally-created babies that many liberals feel is there right to dispose of up until the day of their birth?

Are unborn humans that which you refer to as "ones personal business"?
 
They are?
What personal business are these cons wanting the government to be in control of?

It certainly isn't the business the government stepping into the bedroom to hand out a free condom. So I'm confused.
 
If the fetus is not viable outside the uterus, it isn't a crime, check Roe v. Wade. Rightwingnut cons want to change that, thru whatever means they can muster. The driving force behind it is the religious right, who feel they must interject religion into politics. But why do you, a man, assume to know that all women seeking abortion are getting rid of an "intentional" pregnancy?further, If it was an intentional pregnancy, why would a woman need an abortion?
 
See how you've blown it?

You're trying to pretend abortion is a "personal business" issue. That's just about as heartless a position as there can be.

Think about it. Pro-life cons want to protect innocent unborn humans. Big-hearted tolerant libs tolerate abortions of babies, but wish to preserve the lives of convicted death row murderers. See how your priorities and morals are sorely lacking?
 
they can unsuccessfully try

as we know, and could no doubt produce, a long list of "big gov" things they support
 
More to the point, why do you, a man, think you have any right to interfer with a health decision facing a woman?
 
What are you talking about??

Are you trying to pretend that liberals only desire abortions to be legal only for fetuses not viable outside the uterus??

That's the biggest lie ever told here if that's the bullshit impression you just tried to push here.

And the baby is forming as a result of an unprotected sexual act in 90+% of cases. That is the intentional completion of the act that creates a baby.
 
It's not a "health decision". It's an unborn human.

This is a sympton of your particular brand of mental illness.
 
When those that are seeking government office tell a woman that she shouldn't have access to birth control as part of her insurance plan, and they tell her that even if she is raped, she must go thru a resulting pregnancy, or if continuing a pregnancy would result in a womans death she must go thru with it, and the tell a gay couple that they can't marry and have the same legal protections that married hetero couples have, it is getting into peoples personal business. can you point me to any policy where the current government is forcing condoms on people?
 
actually it can be a health issue if a woman has an existing medical condition that would become worse if she were to get pregnant, and she unintentionally became pregnant.
 
If you are talking about late term abortion, my opinion is that it ought to legal if the life of the mother is in danger. You act as if all women seeking abortion do so without any thought to what they are doing. You are wrong, but then you are man and can't possibly understand how a mother might feel about this kind of decision.
 
Judy1 said:
that conservatives claiming to be for small government, ie less taxes, less regulation and less spending are the same ones who are all for the government getting involved in ones personal business? How do they reconcile this?
Click to expand...

Silly question. Conservatives don't attempt to reconcile anything. They simply believe what they are told to believe -- or at least, they pretend to believe it. It is a mistake to attribute normal thought processes to these folks. Faith has no respect for facts.
 
Judy1 said:
If you are talking about late term abortion, my opinion is that it ought to legal if the life of the mother is in danger. You act as if all women seeking abortion do so without any thought to what they are doing. You are wrong, but then you are man and can't possibly understand how a mother might feel about this kind of decision.
Click to expand...

Excuse me. Gender has nothing to do with his lack of empathy.
 
I dunno. Why do liberals keep trying to end freedom of religion in this nation? Why do birds fly -- excepting penguins and ostriches? Why do bees bumble? Some things just are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top