New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why is Tucker Carlson still employed?

He's the highest rated show on FoxNews and over nearly every network in his time slot. He generates massive amounts of viewers and with that comes big dollars.

Why wouldn't he still be employed?

And that is the answer. He’s still employed because diehard GOP cultists love his lies. They tune in. Good ratings. Lotsa dollars. And that’s what Fox cares about. Not facts. Not truth. Money. It’s that simple.
 
He's the highest rated show on FoxNews and over nearly every network in his time slot. He generates massive amounts of viewers and with that comes big dollars.

Why wouldn't he still be employed?

He should be..but it's supposed to be a news channel
 
What happened to transparency and why isn’t the J6 committee indicted for perjury and tampering with evidence?

Obviously if there was nothing to hide the videos would be of no concern.
 
What happened to transparency and why isn’t the J6 committee indicted for perjury and tampering with evidence?

Obviously if there was nothing to hide the videos would be of no concern.

Holy shit...perjury? Just which of the members of the J6 committee lied under oath.
What evidence was tampered with?

Videos of people standing around prove nothing at all....videos of people attacking the police actually are proof.
 
What happened to transparency and why isn’t the J6 committee indicted for perjury and tampering with evidence?

Obviously if there was nothing to hide the videos would be of no concern.
The videos are of no concern.

Like this... If a murderer is caught on film killing someone in three seconds, but the video shows the murderer sitting about over 7 hours of that video...does this mean the murderer is innocent because there's 7 hours of him doing nothing?
 
What happened to transparency and why isn’t the J6 committee indicted for perjury and tampering with evidence?

Obviously if there was nothing to hide the videos would be of no concern.

I wonder if the NY Post will get banned again.

 
I wonder if the NY Post will get banned again.


Her opinions don't amount to shit to anyone but you. She says defendants have been jailed for two years. I provided a link to the handful of defendants who were kept without bail.

She argues that they have been deprived of a swift trial. She does not provide any account of delays caused by the legal team of the accused....She argues that the video of Angeli walking around the halls is somehow absolution for the accusations he was charged with....she's wrong.

She mentioned someone committing suicide, but doesn't mention a name. No way to verify her information. Great reporting.

She says there was no evidence that rioters shit in the hallways...except it was her employer that reported exactly that.

 
Tucker had 4 million viewers in the 8pm time slot. Lester Holt on NBC had 7 million.

McCarthy gave Tucker Carlson 40,000 hours of video and I have read that Carlson showed only four minutes of video that the public has not already seen. Four minutes of video revealing nothing, followed by endless hours of wingers screeching about the non-story. Trump cultism in action.
 
Her opinions don't amount to shit to anyone but you. She says defendants have been jailed for two years. I provided a link to the handful of defendants who were kept without bail.

She argues that they have been deprived of a swift trial. She does not provide any account of delays caused by the legal team of the accused....She argues that the video of Angeli walking around the halls is somehow absolution for the accusations he was charged with....she's wrong.

She mentioned someone committing suicide, but doesn't mention a name. No way to verify her information. Great reporting.

She says there was no evidence that rioters shit in the hallways...except it was her employer that reported exactly that.


You know for a narrative you defend so much you are surprisingly uninformed.

Ok Ok.... I will come clean, I lied... its not the least bit suprising.
 
You know for a narrative you defend so much you are surprisingly uninformed.

Ok Ok.... I will come clean, I lied... its not the least bit suprising.

You are informed, but by sources who have no facts and no credibility. You continue to defend the most flimsy of accusations and the most fragile of arguments about election fraud, election interference and election results...

When challenged, you run.
 
He should be..but it's supposed to be a news channel

It quit being "news", on any of those networks, when they went to broadcasting 24/7/365.

The History Channel airs very little history, MTV airs very few music videos, and FoxNews, CNN, and MSNBC air very little news.
 
And that is the answer. He’s still employed because diehard GOP cultists love his lies. They tune in. Good ratings. Lotsa dollars. And that’s what Fox cares about. Not facts. Not truth. Money. It’s that simple.

Pretty sure that's what I just said...but, you're free to repeat me if that's what trips your trigger...
 
Tucker had 4 million viewers in the 8pm time slot. Lester Holt on NBC had 7 million.

I see you still have reading comprehension problems...see, my sentence said "He's the highest rated show on FoxNews and over nearly every network in his time slot."

Lester doesn't air against Tucker.

Glad I could help clear up your misunderstanding. This may explain even more...

1678417743291.png1678417743291.png

See where it says "Nightly 6:30/5:30c"? That means it doesn't air at 8PM.
 
It quit being "news", on any of those networks, when they went to broadcasting 24/7/365.

The History Channel airs very little history, MTV airs very few music videos, and FoxNews, CNN, and MSNBC air very little news.
History channel..I dunno what that thing is anymore.. mostly weird shit, alien stuff, etc..
 
Back
Top