Why We Need A Constitutional Conservative Candidate

[Alinvegas]

The United States is at a fork in the road regarding which way we will go as a people. The 2012 election could be the most important in our lifetime, and conservative leaders have reached a consensus on how to channel the energy and concerns of the American people to realize historic change this year.
The status quo will not survive the year. Our debt and spending have reached catastrophic proportions in the context of global financial difficulties and political upheaval. Consequently, by the end of 2012, America will either have taken a decisive step toward socialistic collectivism in the name of “equality” and “social justice,” where businesses and owners are punitively taxed to “pay their fair share,” or America will take a major step in the direction of returning to our Founders’ constitutional government, restoring the rule of law, federalism, free enterprise, and individual initiative and responsibility.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/ken-blackwell/why-we-need-constitutional-conservative-candidate

 

[Yuri Zhivago]

The United States is at a fork in the road regarding which way we will go as a people. The 2012 election could be the most important in our lifetime, and conservative leaders have reached a consensus on how to channel the energy and concerns of the American people to realize historic change this year.
The status quo will not survive the year. Our debt and spending have reached catastrophic proportions in the context of global financial difficulties and political upheaval. Consequently, by the end of 2012, America will either have taken a decisive step toward socialistic collectivism in the name of “equality” and “social justice,” where businesses and owners are punitively taxed to “pay their fair share,” or America will take a major step in the direction of returning to our Founders’ constitutional government, restoring the rule of law, federalism, free enterprise, and individual initiative and responsibility.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/ken-blackwell/why-we-need-constitutional-conservative-candidate

Yeah, we do need another kind of Maoism, the GOP old fashioned one is not good enough

 

[Alinvegas]

Do yourself a favor Igor. Go look up Maoism and post it's definition here where you can read it daily to help you understand how your regime is closer to Maoism than an republican in the history of the US.

 

[Corruptbuddha]

Like who?

Who has a better chance than Romney of defeating Obama?

Huntsman? Not in a million years.

Santorum? Not while saying he wants to outlaw contraception.

Perry? He can't walk and chew gum at the same time.

Newt? I like his ideas, but most AMERICANS (moderates and indies especially) hate his guts.

Like I said, this isn't the cycle for an uber conservative.

Only Romney can win.

 

[Yuri Zhivago]

Do yourself a favor Igor. Go look up Maoism and post it's definition here where you can read it daily to help you understand how your regime is closer to Maoism than an republican in the history of the US.

what has Maoism definition has to do with GOP being the new reincarnation of the old human habits to screw fellow human beings and lust for power, using lies and propaganda?
If one in his previous life was a frog or amoeba, does that somehow is non related to his continuous life- line of stench , lies , power grab, screw your neighbor, brain malfunction and propaganda distortions ?
your simplicity in understanding the apt comparison of not the ideology but the more important and powerful comparison ((ideology is just a facade and tool for power grab and screwing human beings) is a great indicator of the pitiful condition and brain function of most GOP electorate.

 

[Figjam]

...what total nonsense...

...remember it was conservative, nation-building policies that drove us to the economic abyss narrowly averted...

 

[degsme]

The United States is at a fork in the road regarding which way we will go as a people. The 2012 election could be the most important in our lifetime, and conservative leaders have reached a consensus on how to channel the energy and concerns of the American people to realize historic change this year.
The status quo will not survive the year. Our debt and spending have reached catastrophic proportions in the context of global financial difficulties and political upheaval. Consequently, by the end of 2012, America will either have taken a decisive step toward socialistic collectivism in the name of “equality” and “social justice,” where businesses and owners are punitively taxed to “pay their fair share,” or America will take a major step in the direction of returning to our Founders’ constitutional government, restoring the rule of law, federalism, free enterprise, and individual initiative and responsibility.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/ken-blackwell/why-we-need-constitutional-conservative-candidate

RIGHT.... because having The Government regulate what we can do in our bedrooms is so much In The Constitution

And The Constitition is so explicit on immigration..... banning federal governemtn regulation of it...


But hey... ask what you want,

 

[Alinvegas]

Are you asking yourself this question. Cuz, you're the one that keeps calling republicans communists, maoists and fascists. I really don't see others here using these names for republicans.

 

[degsme]

Like who?

Who has a better chance than Romney of defeating Obama?

Huntsman? Not in a million years.

Santorum? Not while saying he wants to outlaw contraception.

Perry? He can't walk and chew gum at the same time.

Newt? I like his ideas, but most AMERICANS (moderates and indies especially) hate his guts.

Like I said, this isn't the cycle for an uber conservative.

Only Romney can win.

And Romney who was For Running Before He Was Against Running Before He Was For Running - can't win.

 

[Alinvegas]

And it is the "Where is my free cheese" gang that is destroying this country and the dems are in on the deal.

 

[degsme]

Are you asking yourself this question. Cuz, you're the one that keeps calling republicans communists, maoists and fascists. I really don't see others here using these names for republicans.

Because unlike conservatives, most Dems are civil centrists

 

[Alinvegas]

You pick on one thing. Funny, is that how you feel the republicans will vote. With their genitalia?

 

[degsme]

You pick on one thing. Funny, is that how you feel the republicans will vote. With their genitalia?

Hint, I picked on TWO things... Bedrooms and immigration.

But if you want to add more, we can go to repealling a Woman's right to enter into contracts or hold property ENFORCED BY THE GOVERNMENT

and we can add in the plank the GOP was putting into its platform about sending Blacks back to Africa

and we can add in the plank the DID put in against the teaching of Yoga in public schools


the ludicrousness goes on and one.

 

[Figjam]

...you mean the military industrial complex that gets the vast majority of our tax dollars?

 

[Yuri Zhivago]

Are you asking yourself this question. Cuz, you're the one that keeps calling republicans communists, maoists and fascists. I really don't see others here using these names for republicans.

Like talking to a wall, not even a hint or sign of intelligent life

 

[Alinvegas]

Hint, I picked on TWO things... Bedrooms and immigration.

But if you want to add more, we can go to repealling a Woman's right to enter into contracts or hold property ENFORCED BY THE GOVERNMENT

and we can add in the plank the GOP was putting into its platform about sending Blacks back to Africa

and we can add in the plank the DID put in against the teaching of Yoga in public schools


the ludicrousness goes on and one.

Can you give us links to one serious candidate that wants to accomplish these things.

 

[Alinvegas]

Oh. you mean the military industrial complex that has gone from 9% of GDP in the 60's to 6% today?

 

[degsme]

Can you give us links to one serious candidate that wants to accomplish these things.

Anyone that claims we need to go back to what Founding Father's Original Intent is ALSO saying that women should not have the right to enter into contracts or hold property - because that was what THE LAW OF THE LAND WAS back at that time and since the Equal Rights Ammendment failed, there is no Constitutional basis (according to this line of reasoning) for any change to that. After all, we cannot allow the idea of what a "legal person" is change with the times. It HAS TO BE what the Founders meant

As for Yoga, Bachmann, Perry, Santorum and even Romney all support essentially that plank. Because the plank was based on the idea of "undermining Christian values that made the nation strong".

And on the "blacks back to africa".... well the racism exhibitted by the GOP on a regular basis, be it the Corker Campaign the last time around or even the unsupported racially resonant comments about Obama, or Breitbart's and Okeefe's attempt to redefine racism so that even MLK's Freedom March counts as a racist event ... is all well in the forefront.

 

[Alinvegas]

The founders also allowed for ammendments by which the things you mention are now a part of the constitution, so again I ask, which serious candidate not only wants to do these things but can?

 

[degsme]

The founders also allowed for ammendments by which the things you mention are now a part of the constitution, so again I ask, which serious candidate not only wants to do these things but can?

Oh none of them CAN take away women's rights to own property and contract. But that has no bearing on the GOP advocating policies that result in this.