New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?
Republicans who wish to remain anonymous are telling the press that "The Impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump" ((r), all rights reserved, CNN) will be over this weekend. No witnesses.

I was hoping there WOULD be witnesses. John Bolton - please tell us what's in your book. You cant buy publicity like that. Hunter Biden - this is like THE THIRD job you've had where you were paid hundreds of thousands to do nothing. What's up with that? That's the sort of shit we expect from Hillary and Chelsea.

But most if all I want testimony from the "anonymous whistleblower". The notion that some civil service drone can topple the presidency based on accusations which are impervious to cross examination is a legal theory that would be laughed out court for any lesser charge. ("Sorry son, you're getting 99 to life for armed robbery, but all the witnesses insist on remaining anonymous")

The reason "no witnesses"is witless? Because it gives the 13 or 15 democrats still running for president unlimited talk and text to claim the trial was a sham, and Trump IS guilty. Well. At least as guilty as Biden (both of them).

The only reason a defense team excludes evidence is to obfuscate the facts.

But then again, Pelosi and Schiff opened the door to this by refusing to allow the whistleblower to testify in the House impeachment hearings. Tit for tat.

Witless. Witless. Witless.

The founding fathers are turning over in their graves for sure.
 
Republicans who wish to remain anonymous are telling the press that "The Impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump" ((r), all rights reserved, CNN) will be over this weekend. No witnesses.

I was hoping there WOULD be witnesses. John Bolton - please tell us what's in your book. You cant buy publicity like that. Hunter Biden - this is like THE THIRD job you've had where you were paid hundreds of thousands to do nothing. What's up with that? That's the sort of shit we expect from Hillary and Chelsea.

But most if all I want testimony from the "anonymous whistleblower". The notion that some civil service drone can topple the presidency based on accusations which are impervious to cross examination is a legal theory that would be laughed out court for any lesser charge. ("Sorry son, you're getting 99 to life for armed robbery, but all the witnesses insist on remaining anonymous")

The reason "no witnesses"is witless? Because it gives the 13 or 15 democrats still running for president unlimited talk and text to claim the trial was a sham, and Trump IS guilty. Well. At least as guilty as Biden (both of them).

The only reason a defense team excludes evidence is to obfuscate the facts.

But then again, Pelosi and Schiff opened the door to this by refusing to allow the whistleblower to testify in the House impeachment hearings. Tit for tat.

Witless. Witless. Witless.

The founding fathers are turning over in their graves for sure.

Correction: According to many of the reports Hunter B wasn't just making hundreds of thousands on those 3 jobs, he was making quite a few millions.
 
Correction: According to many of the reports Hunter B wasn't just making hundreds of thousands on those 3 jobs, he was making quite a few millions.
I'm probably the only person in the room who met BOTH joe biden and son hunter (and deceased son beau).

You are undoubtedly correct.

When I met hunter years ago he was collecting $250,000 a year to do nothing while on retainer to a large, influential bank.

He was later drummed out of the military reserves for cocaine use.
 
You can't seriously be that dimWITted to believe that the whistleblower's identity and public report, subsequently confirmed by Trump's own people at hearings, has any further bearing on the case?

All Hail Trump, amirite?
 
You can't seriously be that dimWITted to believe that the whistleblower's identity and public report, subsequently confirmed by Trump's own people at hearings, has any further bearing on the case?

All Hail Trump, amirite?
So to sum up:

You reject several centuries of constitutional rights that someone accused of a crime has the right to face his accuser in court?

China holding on line 2 for julie; they want you to oversee the court proceedings against democracy advocates there . . .
 
So to sum up:

You reject several centuries of constitutional rights that someone accused of a crime has the right to face his accuser in court?

China holding on line 2 for julie; they want you to oversee the court proceedings against democracy advocates there . . .
The whistleblower opened the door for John Bolton's staff and State Dept diplomats to come forward and testify. They all had first hand knowledge of Trump's extortion of Ukraine for his personal benefit, to cheat in the next election. The whistleblower did not have first hand knowledge.
 
Correction: According to many of the reports Hunter B wasn't just making hundreds of thousands on those 3 jobs, he was making quite a few millions.
84091616_1491119501045104_6562859278401536000_n.jpg

Debate THAT.
 
Back
Top