You said Pence is a hack...wasn't that a point you were trying to make?Don't know, don't care - not relevant to any point I made.
You said Pence is a hack...wasn't that a point you were trying to make?Don't know, don't care - not relevant to any point I made.
Ah, so it was "the left" that called a mob to DC and told the mob to go to the capitol and fight like hell?More like a leftist, set-up political theater show. Kind of as real as these >>
- white mobs alleged to attack blacks at Columbia University- 1987
- Laurie Hecht - 1988
- Sabrina Collins, Emory University- 1990
- the "Shoe Polish Attack" Hoax - 1992
- Gilbert Moore, Jr, - Williams College - 1993
- Alicia Hardin - Trinity Intl University - 2005
- sometimes even Presidents of the US create black victim stories (ex. Bill Clinton's non-existent Arkansas church burnings)
- Madonna Constantine- 2007
- Duke lacrosse players hoax
- Tawana Brawley hoax
Cuz republicans own up to their own crimes and corruption?If Democrats would own up to what they do, and be honest, there wouldnt need to be any more investigations than one. Democrats have a habit of throwing everything but the kitchen sink, into what ought to be a fairly cut & dry subject, the idea being to avoid it by complicating it. This generates more investigations to deal with, and keep up with, the complications.
Came from the left. I suspect Pelosi, mainly.Ah, so it was "the left" that called a mob to DC and told the mob to go to the capitol and fight like hell?
You've been misled to think that; Of course it is about gender, as well as race, police, etc. I suppose you're going to tell us it's just a bunch of History lessons, huh ? We know your indoctrination. Just like you said CRT is only in law schools. Oh brother!CRT is not about gender....
Wow....your first link claims the curriculum is divisive...You didn't even stop for a millisecond to think that they are actually complaining about classes that are not yet in the classroom...It is the district goal. How can they claim it is divisive when they don't even have it on paper yet?You've been misled to think that; Of course it is about gender, as well as race, police, etc. I suppose you're going to tell us it's just a bunch of History lessons, huh ? We know your indoctrination. Just like you said CRT is only in law schools. Oh brother!
Calif. parents slam 'divisive' ethnic studies curriculum: 'Teaching them to be hateful towards people' (msn.com)
http://www.foxnews.com/
Story by Joshua Nelson • 15h ago
The Carlsbad Unified School District (CUSD) is in the process of implementing its first course centered on ethnic studies, causing a debate among community members.
The high school-level class titled "Film Academy Ethnic Studies" outlines the district's goal to teach students about "the histories, cultures, struggles and contributions" of "historically marginalized peoples" with an emphasis on Hollywood and the film industry.
No, I was making the point that he is a hack.You said Pence is a hack...wasn't that a point you were trying to make?
In response to his statement about Trump and Jan 6...No, I was making the point that he is a hack.
And what would you like to say about his statement that Trump owns the riot?No, I was making the point that he is a hack.
So your evidence is some guy’s tweet and an offhand description of one poorly designed review which could best be said to show that advising mask wearing was sometimes ineffective (largely due to lack of compliance), but that did not actually contradict the many robust studies demonstrating that mask mandates work.No, I actually paid attention to the evidence:
As unlisted study author Carl Heneghan - who directs the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford noted on Twitter: "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks."
Massive Peer-Reviewed Mask Study Shows 'Little To No Difference' In Preventing COVID, Flu Infection | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
View attachment 74364
YOU are the one who is "disregarding the evidence" because the evidence only showed that masks make no statistical difference!
And somehow all these leftist Pelosi allies were given calls to action by Trump and his lawyer, and had close contact with Trump surrogates in the hours leading up to the attack, and somehow a large number of well-known pro-Trump activists joined them?Came from the left. I suspect Pelosi, mainly.
Cuz "the left" wanted to protest that Biden won.And somehow all these leftist Pelosi allies were given calls to action by Trump and his lawyer, and had close contact with Trump surrogates in the hours leading up to the attack, and somehow a large number of well-known pro-Trump activists joined them?
You jumped at the first chance, didn't ya?It is obvious that you are suffering from a severe case of pathogenic liberalitis. You exhibit an abundance of scam mentality, consistent with the Russian collusion hoax, the Ukraine babblings, the gold star Muslim father, the McCain ruse, and other such leftist failures, and the 2020 election fraud, which resulted in the further increase of Trump popularity. I shall now prescribe your cure and rehabilitation methodology.
You are to go to the city of the name of a conservative (Republican preferably) US president, and your purification will take place there. I will suggest, Lincoln, Nebraska, or Monroe, New York. Upon your arrival, you will approach the first lake you see, and drink some of the water. Then, you must jump in the lake, with all your liberal clothes on, and swim for one minute. Don't worry, they don't have alligators there.
You then will come out and walk around in the sunshine to dry off, and you must pick a conservative apple from a conservative apple tree, and eat it. This will purify your internal organs and extinguish any liberalism festering there. A conservative apple a day keeps the leftist contamination away.
Upon encountering a roadside stand selling Trump relection paraphenalia, you must buy everything they are selling. You will wear a MAGA hat, a Trump/Pence 2020 banner diagonally across your chest, and at least 50 Trump relection campaign buttons.
You then will spend a week going house to house, hunting down illegal aliens, and reporting them to ICE, for which you will receive a gold medal, which you will sell to a pawn shop, and then buy more Trump paraphenalia. You will then find a wooden soapbox, stand on it, and make speeches to whomever will listen, proclaiming your support for nationwide bans on Islam, sanctuary cities, gun-free zones, homosexuality, and 3rd world immigration.
You will furthermore sing the national anthem, while holding a large American flag in one hand, and holding your hand over your heart with the other. After this, your purification from the disease of liberalism will be complete in its first stage. You will them come back and report to me for further doctor's orders. View attachment 74352
LOL! They are the "gold standard" of medical review. They didn't "review" the studies showing mask mandates "worked" because they preposterously presume the mandate worked for a bit and then ignore that the cases exploded soon after despite the mandate being, you know, still in effect.So your evidence is some guy’s tweet and an offhand description of one poorly designed review which could best be said to show that advising mask wearing was sometimes ineffective (largely due to lack of compliance), but that did not actually contradict the many robust studies demonstrating that mask mandates work.
![]()
Yes, masks reduce the risk of spreading COVID, despite a review saying they don’t
An updated Cochrane Review suggests face masks don’t reduce the spread of COVID in the community. But there are several reasons why this conclusion is misleading.www.gavi.org
I thought I made that clear when I said he "obviously" had something to gain from burying Trump.And what would you like to say about his statement that Trump owns the riot?
Not “presume.” The word you are looking for is “demonstrate.”LOL! They are the "gold standard" of medical review. They didn't "review" the studies showing mask mandates "worked" because they preposterously presume the mandate worked for a bit and then ignore that the cases exploded soon after despite the mandate being, you know, still in effect.
And there is no evidence that they do any of that.Not “presume.” The word you are looking for is “demonstrate.”
Again. The purpose of mandates is not to prevent a spike in cases. It is to delay that spike, lower the total number of cases reached, and make the rise more gradual.